Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12826
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by woundedknees »

Even should Randall qualify, there should be heavy emphasis on taking full advantage of the Jacqua Center, and a probable RS to get him a solid footing in the classroom.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11017
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by buckmarkduck »

From what I've hears Randall did worse on his SAT than Bigalow, and really I didn't think you could do worse than what he did.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by lukeyrid13 »

buckmarkduck wrote:From what I've hears Randall did worse on his SAT than Bigalow, and really I didn't think you could do worse than what he did.
Did Bigelow not qualify either?
User avatar
ncduck
Senior
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by ncduck »

I heard he took the ACT and not the SAT. Maybe it's lower because he didn't take it.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11017
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by buckmarkduck »

I know in Dec Bigs had a SAT score of 580, but I'm sure he will re-take it.
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12826
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by woundedknees »

Bigelow sports a 3.3 GPA... If he fails to get a qualifying SAT or ACT, it's ridiculous.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11017
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by buckmarkduck »

In HS if you show up and turn in your homework you get a 3.0 It's not that hard.
User avatar
ducklovinlady
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:02 pm

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by ducklovinlady »

buckmarkduck wrote:In HS if you show up and turn in your homework you get a 3.0 It's not that hard.
My husband told me that several of his teachers only required the students to show up, which I thought was awful. He didn't go to a very good high school- obviously.

What is a qualifying SAT score? Thank goodness I'm past this point in my life. I'm not sure my brain could handle a 4 hour test anymore!
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12826
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by woundedknees »

Back when I took the SAT, I was disappointed in myself for only scoring 1100 (I somehow got the exact same score on both portions of the exam), out of a possible 1400 (Max at the time). That was considered above the 90th percentile of scores.

I can't imagine what I would have had to do to score below 800 back then, let alone now.

FYI. according to the NCAA Eligibility center, assuming Bigelow has a legit Core GPA of 3.3, he would only need to score 500 to qualify.

https://web1.ncaa.org/eligibilitycenter ... ndards.pdf

"NCAA Division I requires 16 core courses as of August 1, 2008. This rule applies to any student first
entering any Division I college or university on or after August 1, 2008. See the chart below for the breakdown
of this 16 core-course requirement"

"Division I has a sliding scale for test score and grade-point average."

GPA SAT ACT
Verbal and Math ONLY
3.550 & above 400 37
3.525 410 38
3.500 420 39
3.475 430 40
3.450 440 41
3.425 450 41
3.400 460 42
3.375 470 42
3.350 480 43
3.325 490 44
3.300 500 44
3.275 510 45
3.250 520 46
3.225 530 46
3.200 540 47
3.175 550 47
3.150 560 48
3.125 570 49
3.100 580 49
3.075 590 50
3.050 600 50
3.025 610 51
3.000 620 52
2.975 630 52
2.950 640 53
2.925 650 53
2.900 660 54
2.875 670 55
2.850 680 56
2.825 690 56
2.800 700 57
2.775 710 58
2.750 720 59
2.725 730 59
2.700 730 60
2.675 740-750 61
2.650 760 62
2.625 770 63
2.600 780 64
2.575 790 65
2.550 800 66
2.525 810 67
2.500 820 68
2.475 830 69
2.450 840-850 70
2.425 860 70
2.400 860 71
2.375 870 72
2.350 880 73
2.325 890 74
2.300 900 75

http://florida.scout.com/a.z?s=168&p=8&c=1&nid=4606600

Randall plans on majoring in business management and reports a 2.7 core GPA and and a 19 ACT, which he plans on retaking.
Last edited by woundedknees on Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39361
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by greenyellow »

On that scale, I could have easily just marked "C" on the whole test and been eligible for the college.
Image
uostudent
Senior
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:03 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by uostudent »

buckmarkduck wrote:From what I've hears Randall did worse on his SAT than Bigalow, and really I didn't think you could do worse than what he did.
I doubt that. Randall scored a 19 on the ACT his first time (which is equivalent to a 920-950 on the SAT). The problem is that Randall's grades really plummeted after he transferred to a more rigorous high school. I've heard that his grades are anywhere between a 2.1-2.3. If he had a 2.5+, he would have qualified.

To be safe, I think Randall is going to need to score a 21 on the ACT to qualify (1000-1030 on the SAT). That definitely seems doable if he studies.
“If everybody in this room just want to be real with themselves, this game could have went either way,” he said. “We turned the ball over a lot. We beat ourself. Just be real with yourself right now. We beat ourself.”
-Jameis Winston after Oregon's decisive 59-20 victory over Florida State in the Rose Bowl
goducks75
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Tigard/Eugene

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by goducks75 »

uostudent wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:From what I've hears Randall did worse on his SAT than Bigalow, and really I didn't think you could do worse than what he did.
I doubt that. Randall scored a 19 on the ACT his first time (which is equivalent to a 920-950 on the SAT). The problem is that Randall's grades really plummeted after he transferred to a more rigorous high school. I've heard that his grades are anywhere between a 2.1-2.3. If he had a 2.5+, he would have qualified.

To be safe, I think Randall is going to need to score a 21 on the ACT to qualify (1000-1030 on the SAT). That definitely seems doable if he studies.
Sounds a lot like Myles Wade. He transferred to CC from Benson our senior year and his grades dipped. I mean I love that he decided to come back and that I had the opportunity to play on the same team as him again since he's one of my best friends but if he had stayed put at Benson he probably would have been a Duck right now. It's too bad too considering he still wishes his situation didn't go as it did the second time around but both parties have obviously moved on.
User avatar
ducklovinlady
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:02 pm

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by ducklovinlady »

Thanks Wounded. I can't even remember what I got on my SATs. I know I qualified and graduated from college so I must have been ok. lol

It's kinda scary for me to think how students that struggle in high school will do in college, especially playing a sport. I graduated from high school with a 3.8 gpa and played softball in college (only 2 years). My first term I barely had a 2.0 because I did so poorly balancing my social life, fall practice schedule and academics- mostly just had a little too much fun. It was embarrassing and I had to have a gut check about what I needed to adjust to survive. Thankfully, I was able to work really hard and graduate from college with a 3.5. My parents nearly murdered me that first report card though.

No doubts they will have a good support system to help keep them eligible, but it's quite an adjustment. For those that were never really good students or had good study habits, I imagine it's even more difficult.
User avatar
Phalanx
All Pac-12
Posts: 5285
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by Phalanx »

I'm not sure how old Wounded is, but the max was 1600 when I took it in the early 90's. I'm not sure how it works now, but 580 sounds like a score one could achieve by filling in bubbles randomly.
goducks75
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Tigard/Eugene

Re: Sounds like Randall won't be a Duck

Post by goducks75 »

Phalanx wrote:I'm not sure how old Wounded is, but the max was 1600 when I took it in the early 90's. I'm not sure how it works now, but 580 sounds like a score one could achieve by filling in bubbles randomly.
Now it's a 2400 max (they added a writing section) but that grade scale the NCAA clearinghouse uses reflects just the math and reading sections (so pretty much out of the old 1600 scale). But yeah you could probably get a 580 just by filling in C the whole way. I got a 1600 on the new scale and a 1220 on the old scale with me being ill prepared and an awful test taker.
Post Reply