http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TO4mZU36_84
these highlights are pretty good
bumi, is there senior youtube footage on DaT?
Better highlights, Seastrunk, Mamba or Blackmon? (poll)
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
-
vagusnerve
- Freshman
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:56 pm
- briarduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3183
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
- Location: Milwaukie OR
Re: Better highlights, Seastrunk, Mamba or Blackmon? (poll)
This is my order but I would put Mathis in there before Huff and Lowe in at 10th...these guys better all run track, I love the speed on this team!NCDucks09 wrote:Seastrunk is the fastest dude on the team. Second is LaMike. Black Mamba is probably faster than LaMike, but Seastrunk is insanely fast. Only guy who may replace Lache as fastest dude on the team is Tacoi Sumler.
Fastest Ducks:
1. Seastrunk
2. Sumler
3. Black Mamba
4. LaMike
5. Huff
6. Barner
7. Patterson
8. Pleasant
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
- briarduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3183
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
- Location: Milwaukie OR
Re: Better highlights, Seastrunk, Mamba or Blackmon? (poll)
Great stats...sprinting and the "the who's the fastest" is always a fun debate but I'd like to see all of them run a 40 yard race at Austen to really see who's fastest! It would be fun for us fans and these guys should run track for off-season conditioning and to get faster!GrandpaDuck wrote:Based on the 2010 track season. Fastest 100m verifiable F.A.T. times.
LaMichael(10.52w, 10.72), LaThomba (10.59 legal)
....
Barner (10.76) , Lowe (10.78)
....
Seastrunk (10.81) , Huff (10.86), Sumler (10.80)
-----------------------------
Wildcards, No verifiable 2010 times found, but guys who have reportedly broken 11.00 100m
Mathis, Blackmon, French and Malone
Mathis is more of 60m specialist though he has a sub 11.0 PR in the 100m
Blackmon, Patterson, Kelley and Cole are Hurdlers.
Seastrunk had a 10.59 as a Sophomore. Good luck trying to find a 10.33 for Seastrunk, it has been debated in Texas recruiting boards since the claim first appeared and no one I have seen has ever come up with a meet, date, or timing method. It appears to be just recruiting lore similar to Darron Thomas' 40 inch vertical on his Scout profile.
Shuttle and 40 speeds are more relevant for football than 100 meter but 100 meter track times are more apple to apple until Coach Radcliffe does his thing with them.
As far as FB speed, we will see soon enough who uses their speed to the best benefit during the games and to top it off all these guys are ours and they as a group should scare the crap out of who ever we face in the future!
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Better highlights, Seastrunk, Mamba or Blackmon? (poll)
FWIW, Cliff said the fastest player on the team was LaMike. They asked who the fastest player on the team was and he said everyone knew it was LMJ. He also said Seastrunk and Barner were faster than him (Mr. Lock s*** Down).
- NCDucks09
- Senior
- Posts: 2265
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:37 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Better highlights, Seastrunk, Mamba or Blackmon? (poll)
He also said that it'd be "reeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaallllllllllllllll close" between LaMike and Seastrunk.Phenom wrote:FWIW, Cliff said the fastest player on the team was LaMike. They asked who the fastest player on the team was and he said everyone knew it was LMJ. He also said Seastrunk and Barner were faster than him (Mr. Lock s*** Down).
2012 Rose Bowl Champions
2013 Fiesta Bowl Champions
Still Dedicated to the Ducks Winning the Natty!
2013 Fiesta Bowl Champions
Still Dedicated to the Ducks Winning the Natty!
- Hoagduck
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Better highlights, Seastrunk, Mamba or Blackmon? (poll)
There's always a difference between "track speed" and "football speed". The ability to accelerate from standing position while wearing pads is fundamentally different than the stance you take before running, say, the 100m dash.
I'd love to see two RBs go for over 1000 yards again.
I'd love to see two RBs go for over 1000 yards again.