Jerrard Randall

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

RanDux
Senior
Posts: 2840
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
Location: Happy Valley, OR

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by RanDux »

duckfan96 wrote:While we can all think he would have thrived in CK's offense, we will never know. CK and the coaching staff saw something that threw up a red flag. While it sucks...Oregon is looking good at qb right now. DT for 2 years..BB and then Mariota(sp). They will get a qb next year and all will be well.
Oregon is "looking good" with only 3 QBs? Has it been that long since we were down to our 5th string QB? We need more than 3 QBs on our roster.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5816
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by Boom »

RanDux wrote:
duckfan96 wrote:While we can all think he would have thrived in CK's offense, we will never know. CK and the coaching staff saw something that threw up a red flag. While it sucks...Oregon is looking good at qb right now. DT for 2 years..BB and then Mariota(sp). They will get a qb next year and all will be well.
Oregon is "looking good" with only 3 QBs? Has it been that long since we were down to our 5th string QB? We need more than 3 QBs on our roster.
We have 5

Darron Thomas
Bryan Bennett
Daryle Hawkins
Marcus Mariotta
Dustin Hanes (walk on, but I would take him over Chris Harper any day)
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39361
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by greenyellow »

Boom wrote:
RanDux wrote:
duckfan96 wrote:While we can all think he would have thrived in CK's offense, we will never know. CK and the coaching staff saw something that threw up a red flag. While it sucks...Oregon is looking good at qb right now. DT for 2 years..BB and then Mariota(sp). They will get a qb next year and all will be well.
Oregon is "looking good" with only 3 QBs? Has it been that long since we were down to our 5th string QB? We need more than 3 QBs on our roster.
We have 5

Darron Thomas
Bryan Bennett
Daryle Hawkins
Marcus Mariotta
Dustin Hanes (walk on, but I would take him over Chris Harper any day)
I sure as h*ll wouldn't want Haines in there with the game on the line. Plus, I doubt Hawkins will be anything more than an emergency back-up since Chip seems to want to use his athletic ability elsewhere.
Image
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5816
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by Boom »

greenyellow wrote:
Boom wrote:
RanDux wrote:
duckfan96 wrote:While we can all think he would have thrived in CK's offense, we will never know. CK and the coaching staff saw something that threw up a red flag. While it sucks...Oregon is looking good at qb right now. DT for 2 years..BB and then Mariota(sp). They will get a qb next year and all will be well.
Oregon is "looking good" with only 3 QBs? Has it been that long since we were down to our 5th string QB? We need more than 3 QBs on our roster.
We have 5

Darron Thomas
Bryan Bennett
Daryle Hawkins
Marcus Mariotta
Dustin Hanes (walk on, but I would take him over Chris Harper any day)
I sure as h*ll wouldn't want Haines in there with the game on the line. Plus, I doubt Hawkins will be anything more than an emergency back-up since Chip seems to want to use his athletic ability elsewhere.
I agree, but how many schools have a 4th & 5th sting QB that's going to win them games? If you get that far down on the depth chart your SOL regardless



btw I highly doubt Randall could step in as a true freshman and outperform Hawkins.
User avatar
TheMaehlMan
Junior
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 4:21 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by TheMaehlMan »

If we have to worry about our 5th string quarterback next season then we have a lot of problems. When that happened a few years in a row, that was incredibly unlucky.
Image

Going to miss the Maehl Man
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11017
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by buckmarkduck »

Sounds like Marshal is offering him the starting job if he goes there. If I where him I would take that in a heartbeat, he is one kid that needs to get out of Miami for school.
Last edited by buckmarkduck on Sat Mar 12, 2011 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39361
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by greenyellow »

buckmarkduck wrote:Sounds like Marshal is offering him the starting job if he goes their. If I where him I would take that in a heartbeat, he is one kid that needs to get out of Miami for school.
Marshall is usually a bowl-eligible team every year so it would be a good opportunity for him.
Image
GrandpaDuck
Senior
Posts: 3312
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:48 pm

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by GrandpaDuck »

In general if you lose your 2 deep for the season you are screwed. Having a Masoli at #5 was just an incredible piece of luck.

If you have to go to your #3 for just a short time, like #1 and #2 get dinged or concussed in a game and you need to go to an emergency QB to finish up and maybe play the next game your best emergency QBs will be ones that are strong option runners. It''s much easier and safer, when you throw in a kid who doesn't have any meaningful reps, to have him run option and zone read than passing the ball.

Hawkins would be a great emergency QB in that he can throw a little and run a lot. Josh Huff and Devon Blackmon could both be prepped in short order to run a zone read/option run package if you needed a backup to Hawkins for the next game.

If faced with a clean-up game I would hope they would put in a runner rather than burn Mariotti's redshirt to play a quarter or two.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11017
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by buckmarkduck »

I remember in '93 just going to our backup we where screwed, I think UO finished 3-8 that year. Having 3 QB's who are capable is a luxury not the norm.
User avatar
L Perry
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 572
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:02 pm

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by L Perry »

GrandpaDuck wrote:In general if you lose your 2 deep for the season you are screwed. Having a Masoli at #5 was just an incredible piece of luck.

If you have to go to your #3 for just a short time, like #1 and #2 get dinged or concussed in a game and you need to go to an emergency QB to finish up and maybe play the next game your best emergency QBs will be ones that are strong option runners. It''s much easier and safer, when you throw in a kid who doesn't have any meaningful reps, to have him run option and zone read than passing the ball.

Hawkins would be a great emergency QB in that he can throw a little and run a lot. Josh Huff and Devon Blackmon could both be prepped in short order to run a zone read/option run package if you needed a backup to Hawkins for the next game.

If faced with a clean-up game I would hope they would put in a runner rather than burn Mariotti's redshirt to play a quarter or two.

Yep. :)
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39361
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by greenyellow »

GrandpaDuck wrote:In general if you lose your 2 deep for the season you are screwed. Having a Masoli at #5 was just an incredible piece of luck.

If you have to go to your #3 for just a short time, like #1 and #2 get dinged or concussed in a game and you need to go to an emergency QB to finish up and maybe play the next game your best emergency QBs will be ones that are strong option runners. It''s much easier and safer, when you throw in a kid who doesn't have any meaningful reps, to have him run option and zone read than passing the ball.

Hawkins would be a great emergency QB in that he can throw a little and run a lot. Josh Huff and Devon Blackmon could both be prepped in short order to run a zone read/option run package if you needed a backup to Hawkins for the next game.

If faced with a clean-up game I would hope they would put in a runner rather than burn Mariotti's redshirt to play a quarter or two.
Oregon has some incredible athletes who could play a little QB if the situation ever called for them to do it. Let's hope we never use those two at QB unless they are running some Wildcat-type formation.
Image
Handsome Dan
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 3:04 am

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by Handsome Dan »

I'm kind of confused. Are you trying to suggest that Oregon has great athletes other than Huff and Blackmon who could play as quarterback?
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39361
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by greenyellow »

Handsome Dan wrote:I'm kind of confused. Are you trying to suggest that Oregon has great athletes other than Huff and Blackmon who could play as quarterback?
I was including those two as among those that could play QB if Oregon was in dire straits due to injury or Chip wanted to run some sort of specially-designed Wildcat package.
Image
Handsome Dan
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 3:04 am

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by Handsome Dan »

Got it. That's what I thought, but the tone kept jumping out to me as you saying they'd be like the 8th or 9th option rather than 5th or 6th.
JustisM
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:45 am

Re: Jerrard Randall

Post by JustisM »

So I guess he is going to LSU?
Even though local Miami looked into him as well as GT
Image
Post Reply