Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterbacks

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:12 pm

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... caaf-wp982

Post by **greenyellow** » Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:40 pm

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Tue Apr 26, 2011 3:32 pm

greenyellow wrote:

i completely agree with everything you just said.

karlhungis · Post by **karlhungis** » Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:04 pm

"Sarkisian's been on his own as a head coach for two full, mostly successful seasons now at Washington"

Mostly successful?

Post by **greenyellow** » Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:15 pm

karlhungis wrote:"Sarkisian's been on his own as a head coach for two full, mostly successful seasons now at Washington"

Mostly successful?

1 winning season out of two I guess counts as being "mostly successful" to a lot of people.

UofO8 · Post by **UofO8** » Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:39 pm

greenyellow wrote:
karlhungis wrote:"Sarkisian's been on his own as a head coach for two full, mostly successful seasons now at Washington"

Mostly successful?
1 winning season out of two I guess counts as being "mostly successful" to a lot of people.

And the winning season was still mediocre in itself.

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:44 pm

greenyellow wrote:
karlhungis wrote:"Sarkisian's been on his own as a head coach for two full, mostly successful seasons now at Washington"

Mostly successful?
1 winning season out of two I guess counts as being "mostly successful" to a lot of people.

Technically not even a winning regular season.

goducks75 · Post by **goducks75** » Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:48 pm

greenyellow wrote:
karlhungis wrote:"Sarkisian's been on his own as a head coach for two full, mostly successful seasons now at Washington"

Mostly successful?
1 winning season out of two I guess counts as being "mostly successful" to a lot of people.

It does in Seattle. Even Corvallis has higher standards than that.....

Destroyer77 · Post by **Destroyer77** » Wed Apr 27, 2011 11:57 pm

UW might win some games now that they got rid of Locker.

karlhungis · Post by **karlhungis** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:03 am

Destroyer77 wrote:UW might win some games now that they got rid of Locker.

Let's hope not.

uodux1212 · Post by **uodux1212** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:21 am

Destroyer77 wrote:UW might win some games now that they got rid of Locker.

I love how you say "got rid of Locker" like they traded him or something

wlduck · Post by **wlduck** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:57 pm

UOducksTK1 wrote:
greenyellow wrote:
karlhungis wrote:"Sarkisian's been on his own as a head coach for two full, mostly successful seasons now at Washington"

Mostly successful?
1 winning season out of two I guess counts as being "mostly successful" to a lot of people.
Technically not even a winning regular season.

To be fair, they were improvements over the seasons in front of them. You could even say big improvements. But it is easy to go from 0-2 wins to 5-7 wins. Climbing above that is the hard part.

Elduderino · Post by **Elduderino** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:49 pm

wlduck wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:
greenyellow wrote:
karlhungis wrote:"Sarkisian's been on his own as a head coach for two full, mostly successful seasons now at Washington"

Mostly successful?
1 winning season out of two I guess counts as being "mostly successful" to a lot of people.
Technically not even a winning regular season.
To be fair, they were improvements over the seasons in front of them. You could even say big improvements. But it is easy to go from 0-2 wins to 5-7 wins. Climbing above that is the hard part.

Agreed, I think most of us looking at UW objectively would agree that Sarkisian's teams are superior to his predecessors. I too think UW will actually be better off sans Jake Locker.

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:46 pm

I am pretty neutral on UW. I didn't know they were Oregon's rival until I applied to law school here, even, and I have always followed college football pretty closely. I think he has done a good job as coach. I think he has not done a great job, but he did well for the players he had. I don't see them getting to a 10-11 win season any time soon. They have good players at certain positions, but they aren't deep. They aren't good across the board, either.

Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterbacks

Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterbacks

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba

Re: Funny: How Pete Carroll/UW pick their starting quarterba