Scouts 2010 top list 5* and 4*

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

OregonMAX
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:06 am
Location: Bellevue, WA

Re: Scouts 2010 top list 5* and 4*

Post by OregonMAX »

I went to Bellevue High School and we used to play Skyline every year until they jumped up to 4A and we would usually beat them. Last time we played them we had a very down year and still should've beat them if it wasn't for bad clock management. But for some reason, in the past couple years they've become ridiculously overrated. I really don't think that Jake Heaps is that incredible and I think most of the Skyline players will end up being good, but not as great as they're supposed to be.
"Huard's gonna go back to throw the ball. Sets up, looks, throws towards the corner of the endzone. It is... INTERCEPTED! INTERCEPTED! THE DUCKS HAVE THE BALL! Down to the 35! The 40! KENNY WHEATON'S GONNA SCORE!!! KENNY WHEATON'S GONNA SCORE!!! 20! THE 10! TOUCHDOWN!!! KENNY WHEATON, AN INTERCEPTION!!! THE MOST IMPROBABLE FINISH TO A FOOTBALL GAME!!!"
User avatar
ncduck
Senior
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Re: Scouts 2010 top list 5* and 4*

Post by ncduck »

http://rivals100.rivals.com/viewrank.as ... a_key=2369

Curtis White is #72 on the top 100 Rivals list that was just updated. Gotta love that!

Ted Meline is #83, Ivan Mcartney is #85, and Malcolm Jones is #11.

Oh, and OO is now #50 on the list.

There are some other names I've seen bantered on this board as well on the list.
duckgrad99
All Pac-12
Posts: 6086
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Scouts 2010 top list 5* and 4*

Post by duckgrad99 »

ncduck wrote:http://rivals100.rivals.com/viewrank.as ... a_key=2369

Curtis White is #72 on the top 100 Rivals list that was just updated. Gotta love that!

Ted Meline is #83, Ivan Mcartney is #85, and Malcolm Jones is #11.

Oh, and OO is now #50 on the list.

There are some other names I've seen bantered on this board as well on the list.


Thanks for the list. Barr at #19. I'll take a 6'4, 230 pound running back to go along with James.
Image
User avatar
ncduck
Senior
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Re: Scouts 2010 top list 5* and 4*

Post by ncduck »

We're in it for so many more of these guys this year. Of course we'll swing and miss on our fair share like all other programs, but it's really cool that we have a shot at so many more than normal. Oregon is truly a program on the rise!
hermistonduck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 212
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:21 pm

Re: Scouts 2010 top list 5* and 4*

Post by hermistonduck »

I wonder if Barr would be a running back in Oregons system though.. Malichi lewis was a RB in high school I believe.. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind seeing that kid plow through the line of scrimmage but I see him adding a quick 20 lbs of muscle and if he's 6'4'' 240-250lbs I don't know if he will stick at RB... Mops, whats your idea on Barr?
Image
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8615
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Scouts 2010 top list 5* and 4*

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

hermistonduck wrote:I wonder if Barr would be a running back in Oregons system though.. Malichi lewis was a RB in high school I believe.. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind seeing that kid plow through the line of scrimmage but I see him adding a quick 20 lbs of muscle and if he's 6'4'' 240-250lbs I don't know if he will stick at RB... Mops, whats your idea on Barr?
It all depends on his ability. Lewis didn't have the necasary foot speed for RB so they moved him to TE.
Image
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12821
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Scouts 2010 top list 5* and 4*

Post by woundedknees »

WR/TE hybrid?
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9914
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Scouts 2010 top list 5* and 4*

Post by Phenom »

Barr has more than enough footspeed. Think Blount only faster and more agile.
Post Reply