Ducks picked to finish 5th

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:30 pm

http://ducksattack.com/?p=1311

Why did we add Utah and Colorado again? They don't seem to make a substantial contribution to football or basketball except a high number in the W column for most other teams.

Duck07 · Post by **Duck07** » Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:25 pm

UOducksTK1 wrote:http://ducksattack.com/?p=1311

Why did we add Utah and Colorado again? They don't seem to make a substantial contribution to football or basketball except a high number in the W column for most other teams.

Because it allows us to make a lot of money from a P12 Championship game and both schools will become competitive before you know it.

TheMaehlMan · Post by **TheMaehlMan** » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:36 pm

Pretty high praise. It will be a bit bumpy at times in non-conference, but by the time conference play rolls around I think we will be ready to fulfill our high expectations.

I'm very excited for this season, and it has been awhile since that has been the case.

Go Ducks!

oregontrack · Post by **oregontrack** » Fri Oct 28, 2011 6:17 pm

There are $20 million annual reasons why we added Utah and CU.

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:05 am

Duck07 wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:http://ducksattack.com/?p=1311

Why did we add Utah and Colorado again? They don't seem to make a substantial contribution to football or basketball except a high number in the W column for most other teams.
Because it allows us to make a lot of money from a P12 Championship game and both schools will become competitive before you know it.

Sports = Business, and Business = Money.

Transitivity and it all clicks.

Ducks picked to finish 5th

Ducks picked to finish 5th

Re: Ducks picked to finish 5th

Re: Ducks picked to finish 5th

Re: Ducks picked to finish 5th

Re: Ducks picked to finish 5th