Castro wavering?

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

User avatar
Tray Dub
Senior
Posts: 4994
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: Castro wavering?

Post by Tray Dub »

NCDucks09 wrote:If a girl commits to an 'exclusive' relationship with you and then says, well, I still owe this other guy a trip to visit him because I told him I would before we became official, would you still be interested in that girl?

If his commitment to Oregon was solid, he wouldn't be visiting other schools.
Are the relationships the same? Like, at all? Castro probably bonded with coaches up there and would feel bad not even taking a trip up there. Let's stop the oversensitive whining and let the kid enjoy the process.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39361
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Castro wavering?

Post by greenyellow »

Tray Dub wrote:
NCDucks09 wrote:If a girl commits to an 'exclusive' relationship with you and then says, well, I still owe this other guy a trip to visit him because I told him I would before we became official, would you still be interested in that girl?

If his commitment to Oregon was solid, he wouldn't be visiting other schools.
Are the relationships the same? Like, at all? Castro probably bonded with coaches up there and would feel bad not even taking a trip up there. Let's stop the oversensitive whining and let the kid enjoy the process.
+1
Image
uodux1212
Senior
Posts: 3965
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:44 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Castro wavering?

Post by uodux1212 »

Tray Dub wrote:
NCDucks09 wrote:If a girl commits to an 'exclusive' relationship with you and then says, well, I still owe this other guy a trip to visit him because I told him I would before we became official, would you still be interested in that girl?

If his commitment to Oregon was solid, he wouldn't be visiting other schools.
Are the relationships the same? Like, at all? Castro probably bonded with coaches up there and would feel bad not even taking a trip up there. Let's stop the oversensitive whining and let the kid enjoy the process.
For real.
Image

"How do we go from nine to one?" - Chip Kelly

“Our expectations are to win every game we play." - CK
Jduck
One Star Recruit
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Castro wavering?

Post by Jduck »

Castro checks out Washington
November, 28, 2011
NOV 28
2:09 PM ET

By Greg Biggins
After mulling over whether to officially visit Washington or not, Oregon commit Jeremy Castro (Murrieta, Calif./Vista Murrieta) did decided to head to Seattle over the weekend.

Castro originally committed to Washington back in the summer but flipped to Oregon after officially visiting Eugene earlier in the season. He set a visit to UW a month ago, but then canceled it saying he was solid with Oregon and didn’t see a need to take any more visits.

“I talked with my family and we decided it worth taking one more look at Washington,” Castro said. “It was a great trip and I’m definitely glad I took it. I loved everything about it but probably the fan support and overall game atmosphere was my favorite part. They have a great fan base, not as loud as Oregon, but pretty close.

“Coach [Demetrice] Martin is the coach who has been recruiting me for a while and we have a real good relationship. I could tell the staff was still a little hurt that I committed there and then de-committed but they were still real cool with me. Although I loved the visit, I’m sticking with Oregon. I’m solid in my commitment and I plan to be a Duck and will be signing with them in February.”

Despite his solid commitment, Castro said he’ll still have schools in for home visits in the next few weeks.

“I don’t have any dates yet but Oregon, UCLA and Washington will all be coming in,” Castro said. “I’m not sure what’s going to happen with UCLA but it sounds like Coach [Rick] Neuheisel may not be around much longer. The Pac-12 is crazy right now, ASU is letting Dennis Erickson go and my brother, C.J. Dozier, committed there. I know Coach [Chip] Kelly isn’t going anywhere so that’s a relief.”
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Castro wavering?

Post by Duck07 »

OH NO! HE'S ALLOWING THEM TO DO IN-HOME VISITS!

YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!
Image
User avatar
Tray Dub
Senior
Posts: 4994
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: Castro wavering?

Post by Tray Dub »

Duck07 wrote:OH NO! HE'S ALLOWING THEM TO DO IN-HOME VISITS!

YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!
Hey! You're right! I WOULDN'T LET MY GIRLFRIEND DO THAT!!!





(just poking a little fun, NC.)
jimmy12
Senior
Posts: 2823
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:38 am

Re: Castro wavering?

Post by jimmy12 »

Yawn
Pontius
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 257
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:45 am

Re: Castro wavering?

Post by Pontius »

Tray Dub wrote:
Duck07 wrote:OH NO! HE'S ALLOWING THEM TO DO IN-HOME VISITS!

YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!
Hey! You're right! I WOULDN'T LET MY GIRLFRIEND DO THAT!!!





(just poking a little fun, NC.)

His analogy is probably the most accurate of any to describe a situation where the integrity of the word 'commitment' is compromised. I think that was the issue. And so the argument is whether or not to consider such a recruit a commitment, if he so chooses to act in contrary to the integrity of the word. He's either committed and wasting other people's time, or he's not really committed;unsure. Either way, he's not seeing beyond himself.
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Castro wavering?

Post by Duck07 »

Pontius wrote:
Tray Dub wrote:
Duck07 wrote:OH NO! HE'S ALLOWING THEM TO DO IN-HOME VISITS!

YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!
Hey! You're right! I WOULDN'T LET MY GIRLFRIEND DO THAT!!!





(just poking a little fun, NC.)

His analogy is probably the most accurate of any to describe a situation where the integrity of the word 'commitment' is compromised. I think that was the issue. And so the argument is whether or not to consider such a recruit a commitment, if he so chooses to act in contrary to the integrity of the word. He's either committed and wasting other people's time, or he's not really committed;unsure. Either way, he's not seeing beyond himself.
Clearly we're all men, because in that scenario, the gf is supposed to be Ok with the bf checking out other chicks :lol:
Image
Post Reply