Ducks #6 in RPI

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40703
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Ducks #6 in RPI

Post by UOducksTK1 »


Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Ducks #6 in RPI

Post by Duck07 »

That won't temper anybody's expectations :lol:
Image
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40703
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Ducks #6 in RPI

Post by UOducksTK1 »

321.
UTEP
1 - 3 0.3311 308 0 - 1 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 - 0 1 - 1

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
oregontrack
All Pac-12
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: Ducks #6 in RPI

Post by oregontrack »

this is why the nebraska game was so big. play a road game, the computers reward you. win a road game and you're golden. it doesn't matter how good nebraska may or may not be, as long as they don't crash and dive in big 10 play that was a game that will put us over the top if we find ourselves on the bubble.

we were only five games over .500 in '08 (18-13) but got a #8 seed (or was it #9? eh, who cares) because of road wins at kansas state and arizona. the committee eats that stuff up.
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40703
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Ducks #6 in RPI

Post by UOducksTK1 »

oregontrack wrote:this is why the nebraska game was so big. play a road game, the computers reward you. win a road game and you're golden. it doesn't matter how good nebraska may or may not be, as long as they don't crash and dive in big 10 play that was a game that will put us over the top if we find ourselves on the bubble.

we were only five games over .500 in '08 (18-13) but got a #8 seed (or was it #9? eh, who cares) because of road wins at kansas state and arizona. the committee eats that stuff up.
True but the Pac-12 sucks so bad this year..

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
oregontrack
All Pac-12
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: Ducks #6 in RPI

Post by oregontrack »

agreed, but we'll still get at least three in. i guess the goal should be to try to finish in the top 1/4 of the pac.

win @ byu and we'll set ourselves up nicely as long as we're over .500 in the pac-12, no matter how bad the conference is.
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
frogsnouts
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:41 pm

Re: Ducks #6 in RPI

Post by frogsnouts »

UOducksTK1 wrote:321.
UTEP
1 - 3 0.3311 308 0 - 1 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 - 0 1 - 1
UTEP may be one of the worst teams we play all year, and we play some bad ones. :lol:

Hopefully we can pull off the win @BYU. Those guys don't look super impressive this year, so I certainly think we have a chance.
duck55
Senior
Posts: 2157
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:37 am
Location: Keizer OR

Re: Ducks #6 in RPI

Post by duck55 »

Had me going on who #6 is/was with the RPI bit.
USUaggieDuck
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 12:37 am

Re: Ducks #6 in RPI

Post by USUaggieDuck »

we are forecasted to end up around 60.

http://www.rpiforecast.com/teams/Oregon.html

we have an 8% chance of ending up in the top 25.
we have about an 11% chance of ending up worse than 98.
Post Reply