yesterday. today he is a 3 star. Rivals.
what?
what? Daniels was a 4 star
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
-
sx1080
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:56 am
-
ducksrock
- Senior
- Posts: 2738
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:08 am
Re: what? Daniels was a 4 star
Probly would have been promoted to a 5 star, had he committed to Arkansas......sx1080 wrote:yesterday. today he is a 3 star. Rivals.
what?
-
briarduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3183
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
- Location: Milwaukie OR
Re: what? Daniels was a 4 star
I heard from another site that is was just bad timing. Rivals did a re-evaluation and Daniels fell from 5.9(4*) to 5.8(3*), luckily he's still the same player...sorry I just read thru four pages of complains over this.
The kids a stud and I happy to have him and I can't wait to see what he can do as a Duck!
The kids a stud and I happy to have him and I can't wait to see what he can do as a Duck!
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
-
roleplay3r1
- One Star Recruit
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:50 pm
Re: what? Daniels was a 4 star
they had updated the top 100 on I think Sunday night. At the time, the new 250 hadn't been revealed yet. My guess is they finished the re-ranking of all the rest of the 250 a day or two later. Definitely bad timing.
-
RebelDuck
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:54 am
Re: what? Daniels was a 4 star
Just ignore the star ratings. They are and always be a little biased. The offer list is what really matters.
-
nehalem
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:15 pm
Re: what? Daniels was a 4 star
Your "GD" right!RebelDuck wrote:Just ignore the star ratings. They are and always be a little biased. The offer list is what really matters.