What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Williams?

OregonFan4Life · Post by **OregonFan4Life** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

That would be three RB's, I highly doubt they land Trey Williams, but if someone could surprisingly land a RB like him, it'd be Gary Campbell. Would Oregon cut Foster or Marshall? Will Oregon not make much of an effort for Williams if Foster commits soon? Chip finds a way to get player on the field, but even if these guys redshirt, no way he can find ways to get DeAnthony, Carson, Byron Marshall, DJ Foster, and Trey Williams on the field at RB during the 2013 season can he?

Duck07 · Post by **Duck07** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:16 pm

OregonFan4Life wrote:That would be three RB's, I highly doubt they land Trey Williams, but if someone could surprisingly land a RB like him, it'd be Gary Campbell. Would Oregon cut Foster or Marshall? Will Oregon not make much of an effort for Williams if Foster commits soon? Chip finds a way to get player on the field, but even if these guys redshirt, no way he can find ways to get DeAnthony, Carson, Byron Marshall, DJ Foster, and Trey Williams on the field at RB during the 2013 season can he?

somebody would eventually transfer.

Duffman57 · Post by **Duffman57** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:44 pm

Then wed turn into USC where we have 6 of the top backs on our team. That'd be an interesting combo though, Carson, DAT, Foster, Barner, Williams all runnin the ball with Tyner comin in to replace Barner next year, ha....ha...

karlhungis · Post by **karlhungis** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:49 pm

Something tells me this is one of those "what happens if" scenarios that we don't really need to worry about.

vagusnerve · Post by **vagusnerve** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:15 pm

Yeah I'd be super stoked with any two of the three

woundedknees · Post by **woundedknees** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:47 pm

Once again, it would become a "pick your poison" situation fo opposing DCs.

hines · Post by **hines** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:05 pm

What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Williams?

we won't because we'd pull a scholie when the 2nd one committed.

this is filed under: for the love of god please think about this a bit harder so you don't waste anyone's time. thanks.

vagusnerve · Post by **vagusnerve** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:50 pm

Hines, I saw you posted on this thread and I was hoping I was gonna see something like:

"Nah. Gonna. Happen."

OregonFan4Life · Post by **OregonFan4Life** » Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:43 am

hines wrote:
What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Williams?
we won't because we'd pull a scholie when the 2nd one committed.

this is filed under: for the love of god please think about this a bit harder so you don't waste anyone's time. thanks.

Right I understand they'd pull a scholie, just wondering if it'd be for one of the RB's or for a different position.

Oregonian · Post by **Oregonian** » Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:28 am

Our running back sequencing has been a little bit odd as of late, as long as these guys egos aren't sky high and they don't mind redshirting and paying their dues, the way we have it setup right now they'd have 2 years of starting carries available once Carson and Thomas are gone (possibly on the field earlier if Thomas is able to make to put on some pounds and make the NFL leap with his speed as a Junior).

What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Williams?

What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Williams?

Re: What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Willi

Re: What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Willi

Re: What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Willi

Re: What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Willi

Re: What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Willi

Re: What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Willi

Re: What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Willi

Re: What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Willi

Re: What happens if Oregon lands Marshall, Foster, and Willi