Exactly why you cannot overturn the call, even if there is an obscure rule that would allow the refs to ignore the fact that they had blown the play dead prior to the ball crossing the line.dd10snoop28 wrote:Impossible to see. The guy in front of him is blocking the camera's view. Should have been ruled a TD.duckpoint wrote:I agree with The Dude, his left elbow was down prior to the ball crossing the plane. Stanford put their chance of winning on the backs of their OL. It was not even close without an extraordinary effort by Taylor.
#17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

- dd10snoop28
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame
But the call on the field wasn't him being down at the 1-inch line.... the call was that they had blown the play dead too early. I'm confident that the refs would have still ruled it a touchdown if they had the chance. In the replay you see the ball crossing the goal-line and no body part that makes you "down" touching the ground. Sure the ND guy has his leg in the way, but refs usually rule by what they see, not the lack thereof.Duck07 wrote:Exactly why you cannot overturn the call, even if there is an obscure rule that would allow the refs to ignore the fact that they had blown the play dead prior to the ball crossing the line.dd10snoop28 wrote:Impossible to see. The guy in front of him is blocking the camera's view. Should have been ruled a TD.duckpoint wrote:I agree with The Dude, his left elbow was down prior to the ball crossing the plane. Stanford put their chance of winning on the backs of their OL. It was not even close without an extraordinary effort by Taylor.

- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame
Either way you look at it, you cannot end up with a ND td. If you call the play dead prior to the end zone, you can't give him forward progress after the whistle so ND wins. If you say that the ruling on the field was that the runner was down prior to crossing, then upon review there was not conclusive evidence that his elbow did NOT touch the ground.dd10snoop28 wrote: But the call on the field wasn't him being down at the 1-inch line.... the call was that they had blown the play dead too early. I'm confident that the refs would have still ruled it a touchdown if they had the chance. In the replay you see the ball crossing the goal-line and no body part that makes you "down" touching the ground. Sure the ND guy has his leg in the way, but refs usually rule by what they see, not the lack thereof.

-
squintsdd
- Senior
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am
Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame
Looked like he crossed the goal line on second down anyway, should've never gotten to 4th down. IMO Stanford deserves credit for 2 touchdowns
-
vagusnerve
- Freshman
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:56 pm
Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame
The whole things just crazy. Hard to believe that Notre Dame is relevant again, and then for them to get all this advantage from the refs, wow, just makes my blood boil. If I were Shaw, I would go to the top with this one. It's an absolute travesty.
-
karlhungis
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7990
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am
Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame
It was a borderline call that could have gone either way. I hate Notre Dame as much as the next guy and it looked like forward progress was stopped to me.vagusnerve wrote:The whole things just crazy. Hard to believe that Notre Dame is relevant again, and then for them to get all this advantage from the refs, wow, just makes my blood boil. If I were Shaw, I would go to the top with this one. It's an absolute travesty.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
-
Duck24
- Senior
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:36 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame
It shouldn't have even come to putting the game on the refs. That was horrendous play calling by David Shaw. I understand that they are a smash mouth team and are trying to play to their strength but the EXACT SAME CALL twice in a row from the half inch line? Call a QB sneak or run away from the Center-Guard gap, where Notre Dame is putting literally 7 guys. I think the refs blew the call on the field but it was one of those calls where whatever was called on the field was going to be upheld. Now we can just hope that Oklahoma and USC knock Notre Dame off because I think that they are a lock for the Natty if they end the season undefeated.
-
ducksrock
- Senior
- Posts: 2729
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:08 am
Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame
Yeah, if the Domers run the table, I would agree they are in the Natty....Still alot of serious football for them to play though....Duck24 wrote:It shouldn't have even come to putting the game on the refs. That was horrendous play calling by David Shaw. I understand that they are a smash mouth team and are trying to play to their strength but the EXACT SAME CALL twice in a row from the half inch line? Call a QB sneak or run away from the Center-Guard gap, where Notre Dame is putting literally 7 guys. I think the refs blew the call on the field but it was one of those calls where whatever was called on the field was going to be upheld. Now we can just hope that Oklahoma and USC knock Notre Dame off because I think that they are a lock for the Natty if they end the season undefeated.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40569
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame
Looked like a touchdown from me, but what do I know after watching the Packers/Seahawks game.
Packers are still 4-2 in my books.
Packers are still 4-2 in my books.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13