#17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

Post by Duck07 »

dd10snoop28 wrote:
duckpoint wrote:I agree with The Dude, his left elbow was down prior to the ball crossing the plane. Stanford put their chance of winning on the backs of their OL. It was not even close without an extraordinary effort by Taylor.
Impossible to see. The guy in front of him is blocking the camera's view. Should have been ruled a TD.
Exactly why you cannot overturn the call, even if there is an obscure rule that would allow the refs to ignore the fact that they had blown the play dead prior to the ball crossing the line.
Image
User avatar
dd10snoop28
All Pac-12
Posts: 5042
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

Post by dd10snoop28 »

Duck07 wrote:
dd10snoop28 wrote:
duckpoint wrote:I agree with The Dude, his left elbow was down prior to the ball crossing the plane. Stanford put their chance of winning on the backs of their OL. It was not even close without an extraordinary effort by Taylor.
Impossible to see. The guy in front of him is blocking the camera's view. Should have been ruled a TD.
Exactly why you cannot overturn the call, even if there is an obscure rule that would allow the refs to ignore the fact that they had blown the play dead prior to the ball crossing the line.
But the call on the field wasn't him being down at the 1-inch line.... the call was that they had blown the play dead too early. I'm confident that the refs would have still ruled it a touchdown if they had the chance. In the replay you see the ball crossing the goal-line and no body part that makes you "down" touching the ground. Sure the ND guy has his leg in the way, but refs usually rule by what they see, not the lack thereof.
Image
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

Post by Duck07 »

dd10snoop28 wrote: But the call on the field wasn't him being down at the 1-inch line.... the call was that they had blown the play dead too early. I'm confident that the refs would have still ruled it a touchdown if they had the chance. In the replay you see the ball crossing the goal-line and no body part that makes you "down" touching the ground. Sure the ND guy has his leg in the way, but refs usually rule by what they see, not the lack thereof.
Either way you look at it, you cannot end up with a ND td. If you call the play dead prior to the end zone, you can't give him forward progress after the whistle so ND wins. If you say that the ruling on the field was that the runner was down prior to crossing, then upon review there was not conclusive evidence that his elbow did NOT touch the ground.
Image
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

Post by squintsdd »

Looked like he crossed the goal line on second down anyway, should've never gotten to 4th down. IMO Stanford deserves credit for 2 touchdowns
vagusnerve
Freshman
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

Post by vagusnerve »

The whole things just crazy. Hard to believe that Notre Dame is relevant again, and then for them to get all this advantage from the refs, wow, just makes my blood boil. If I were Shaw, I would go to the top with this one. It's an absolute travesty.
karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7990
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

Post by karlhungis »

vagusnerve wrote:The whole things just crazy. Hard to believe that Notre Dame is relevant again, and then for them to get all this advantage from the refs, wow, just makes my blood boil. If I were Shaw, I would go to the top with this one. It's an absolute travesty.
It was a borderline call that could have gone either way. I hate Notre Dame as much as the next guy and it looked like forward progress was stopped to me.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
Duck24
Senior
Posts: 4744
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:36 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

Post by Duck24 »

It shouldn't have even come to putting the game on the refs. That was horrendous play calling by David Shaw. I understand that they are a smash mouth team and are trying to play to their strength but the EXACT SAME CALL twice in a row from the half inch line? Call a QB sneak or run away from the Center-Guard gap, where Notre Dame is putting literally 7 guys. I think the refs blew the call on the field but it was one of those calls where whatever was called on the field was going to be upheld. Now we can just hope that Oklahoma and USC knock Notre Dame off because I think that they are a lock for the Natty if they end the season undefeated.
ducksrock
Senior
Posts: 2729
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:08 am

Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

Post by ducksrock »

Duck24 wrote:It shouldn't have even come to putting the game on the refs. That was horrendous play calling by David Shaw. I understand that they are a smash mouth team and are trying to play to their strength but the EXACT SAME CALL twice in a row from the half inch line? Call a QB sneak or run away from the Center-Guard gap, where Notre Dame is putting literally 7 guys. I think the refs blew the call on the field but it was one of those calls where whatever was called on the field was going to be upheld. Now we can just hope that Oklahoma and USC knock Notre Dame off because I think that they are a lock for the Natty if they end the season undefeated.
Yeah, if the Domers run the table, I would agree they are in the Natty....Still alot of serious football for them to play though....
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40569
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: #17 Stanford @ #7 Notre Dame

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Looked like a touchdown from me, but what do I know after watching the Packers/Seahawks game.

Packers are still 4-2 in my books.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
Post Reply