Rose Bowl
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
-
rockthief
- Senior
- Posts: 4781
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:52 am
- Location: Stand By Me
Re: Rose Bowl
okay, good. Now Ducks pls kick some butt.
-
QuackininBama
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5664
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:55 am
Re: Rose Bowl
Stanford is for real. They are not going away.
-
Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Rose Bowl
They lose a bunch of players.QuackininBama wrote:Stanford is for real. They are not going away.
-
UofO8
- Senior
- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:41 pm
-
Bud Lee
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5541
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:03 am
- Location: Da Boot
Re: Rose Bowl
Good win for Stanford, can't help but to think after watching this game that they got lucky Ohio State and Penn were ineligible
-
MFRDuckFan
- Senior
- Posts: 4829
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Medford
Re: Rose Bowl
Stanford has 32 Seniors graduating this year. Oregon has 17.
It's going to be interesting next year.
It's going to be interesting next year.
-
Bud Lee
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5541
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:03 am
- Location: Da Boot
Re: Rose Bowl
32! How many of those are starters?MFRDuckFan wrote:Stanford has 32 Seniors graduating this year. Oregon has 17.
It's going to be interesting next year.
-
Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Rose Bowl
Penn St. wasn't all that good. If OSU was eligible they would be playing for the NCG not the Rose. Next.Bud Lee wrote:Good win for Stanford, can't help but to think after watching this game that they got lucky Ohio State and Penn were ineligible
-
MFRDuckFan
- Senior
- Posts: 4829
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Medford
Re: Rose Bowl
I'm not sure. http://www.gostanford.com/sports/m-foot ... l-mtt.htmlBud Lee wrote:32! How many of those are starters?MFRDuckFan wrote:Stanford has 32 Seniors graduating this year. Oregon has 17.
It's going to be interesting next year.
-
greenyellow
- Moderator
- Posts: 39213
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Rose Bowl
The problem with Stanford's listed roster is that they list their players by their academic year and they don't typically indicate if a player has taken their redshirt year.
-
OreDucks01284
- Senior
- Posts: 3635
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:29 pm
- Location: Salem, Oregon
Re: Rose Bowl
Honestly it was little big boring game, not as exciting it was last rose gowl game.
Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk HD
Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk HD
-
gofightingducks
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:08 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Rose Bowl
Stanford is losing some talented starters but so is Oregon, Stanford will be good again next season and it will probably come down to Stanford and Oregon to win the conference again maybe even for a chance at the national championship. Stanford didn't have many blowout wins like Oregon but they got it done and won a Rose bowl and beat Oregon.
-
UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 40568
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Rose Bowl
Pretty rough. That's what happens when your best teams get in trouble.UofO8 wrote:Losing 3 Rose Bowls in a row LOL
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
-
dthomas=ddixon
- Moderator
- Posts: 8648
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
- Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Re: Rose Bowl
The scary thing about Furd is their recruiting has really improved. Their Oline for example is only going to get better with the talent they pulled in, so that running game will be just as strong.
-
Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Rose Bowl
Their DLine has been good for a while. They're hurting for WRs thoughBiggus Duckus wrote:Recruiting OL and QB to an academic school is easy. Not so much for the other positions, especially the DL.