wheaton4prez wrote:If identical trees were on some random farm that nobody knew about, I doubt someone who poisoned them would receive any jail time at all. Fine and probation most likely. The guy deserved a penalty. But, it does seem wrong that it would be a heightened penalty due to football fan anger.
I've had a hard time finding details explaining how they knew for certain that the trees needed to be removed. Anyone have a link?
I found this: "As John Zenor of the Associated Press points out, the school is in the preparation stages of a seven-figure plan to keep the area a hot spot for the Auburn faithful after it was poisoned by an arch-rival Alabama Crimson Tide fan."
Sounds a little fishy to me.
The fact that they were dead was probably a big clue that they needed to be removed. From what I understand they are going to try to replace them, which is a very costly processes. The trees themselves would be 6 figures apiece, then you have to dig them, move them, plant them, and spend a fortune to nurture them until they are stable. A buddy of mine did something similar on his property but with a cheaper version of a live oak, ran about 250,000 from what he told me.
If it was on someone’s personal property, he would have to compensate the property owner for the value of the trees and would still get the minimum of 6 months from what I understand. Like I said earlier, you have to take in consideration that this was a venerated object, hence my statue analogy.