Oregon offers UCLA OL commit Jaxson Kirkland

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11016
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Oregon offers UCLA OL commit Jaxson Kirkland

Post by buckmarkduck »

One absolute fact that can't be argued, HS OL are the hardest to project and evaluate of any position. Most of these kids aren't facing guys their strength or size, day in and day out. If we are going to reach for a kid, OL is the place to do it, and I'll trust Marios evaluation over most people's.
Handsome Dan
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 3:04 am

Re: Oregon offers UCLA OL commit Jaxson Kirkland

Post by Handsome Dan »

All the problems that have been identified are fixable...
uostudent
Senior
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:03 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Oregon offers UCLA OL commit Jaxson Kirkland

Post by uostudent »

buckmarkduck wrote:One absolute fact that can't be argued, HS OL are the hardest to project and evaluate of any position. Most of these kids aren't facing guys their strength or size, day in and day out. If we are going to reach for a kid, OL is the place to do it, and I'll trust Marios evaluation over most people's.
Definitely agree with this. It appears that Taggart is going to take at least 25 kids in this class and I'd prefer a project OL over a so-so 5'8 slot receiver. I also agree with most here that Kirkland's film isn't very impressive.
“If everybody in this room just want to be real with themselves, this game could have went either way,” he said. “We turned the ball over a lot. We beat ourself. Just be real with yourself right now. We beat ourself.”
-Jameis Winston after Oregon's decisive 59-20 victory over Florida State in the Rose Bowl
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4517
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: Oregon offers UCLA OL commit Jaxson Kirkland

Post by nogerO »

uostudent wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:One absolute fact that can't be argued, HS OL are the hardest to project and evaluate of any position. Most of these kids aren't facing guys their strength or size, day in and day out. If we are going to reach for a kid, OL is the place to do it, and I'll trust Marios evaluation over most people's.
Definitely agree with this. It appears that Taggart is going to take at least 25 kids in this class and I'd prefer a project OL over a so-so 5'8 slot receiver. I also agree with most here that Kirkland's film isn't very impressive.
I have to be patient and think that Mario must have seen something in the kid. Good enough for me.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
srsmiley007
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:26 am

Re: Oregon offers UCLA OL commit Jaxson Kirkland

Post by srsmiley007 »

nogerO wrote:
uostudent wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:One absolute fact that can't be argued, HS OL are the hardest to project and evaluate of any position. Most of these kids aren't facing guys their strength or size, day in and day out. If we are going to reach for a kid, OL is the place to do it, and I'll trust Marios evaluation over most people's.
Definitely agree with this. It appears that Taggart is going to take at least 25 kids in this class and I'd prefer a project OL over a so-so 5'8 slot receiver. I also agree with most here that Kirkland's film isn't very impressive.
I have to be patient and think that Mario must have seen something in the kid. Good enough for me.
What Mario saw is a project. You can't teach big. He also knows about his Dad which is a genetics play.

Jaxson is by no means physically developed and the leap between his JR film and SR. film is significant. He is not a natural athlete,,..yet! He has good upper body strength but terrible core, lower body development and flexibility. He appears to be a late bloomer and they are betting on that. If he doesn't bloom in 2-3 years than adios. However, he's a 5 year kid and could be good but again a pure project. They need the JUCO tackle (visiting this weekend) who is significantly better than anyone targeted to-date. However, Bechton could be tremendous in 2 years so let's hold hope for him. That said, Jaxson won't see the field unless it's a massive blowout for 2-3 years. He would get crushed against a legit DE. He is however, 6'7 and 300+. His dad wasn't a late bloomer, only 6'3 but did play in the NFL so lets hope for the genetics to kick in.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Oregon offers UCLA OL commit Jaxson Kirkland

Post by StevensTechU »

damascusduck wrote:Who do you trust? Taggart, MC and the rest of the staff. Or internet recruiting experts. I know where I stand with that question.
I guess we should all just pipe down and not have opinions! Case closed - Thanks Damacus!

But more seriously, your opinion and logic is totally fine. I'm not sure why you take issue with dissenting opinions, though.
damascusduck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: Oregon offers UCLA OL commit Jaxson Kirkland

Post by damascusduck »

My opinion is just that, mine. Isn't that what a message board is for? Reading some of the posts above, you'd think he's lucky to get a Pac 12 offer, when in fact he has a decent offer list. I guess I trust the coaches opinion more than mostly anonymous internet evaluators.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Oregon offers UCLA OL commit Jaxson Kirkland

Post by StevensTechU »

damascusduck wrote:I guess I trust the coaches opinion more than mostly anonymous internet evaluators.
Right, you said that. My question is about why you have an issue with people who use the web as a platform to discuss what they see on film or in person.
damascusduck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: Oregon offers UCLA OL commit Jaxson Kirkland

Post by damascusduck »

Where did I say that? I said I trust the coaches evaluation more. That is all.
Post Reply