Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

damascusduck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by damascusduck »

Phalanx wrote:Usually the rankings are as much based on how many recruits as how good they are. So Oregon will likely be a tad overrated, having the 20 slot receiver/running backs from Florida that signed.
But some of those "20" will end up on special teams and add depth which this class needed badly. Probably a couple moving to D.
User avatar
EncinitasDuck
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:45 pm
Location: Grants Pass Oregon

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by EncinitasDuck »

Thank god. I think this board would have melted at this point had he gone elsewhere. Go Ducks!!!
ducksrock
Senior
Posts: 2738
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:08 am

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by ducksrock »

duck541 wrote:
ducksrock wrote:
duck541 wrote:
ducksrock wrote:
duck541 wrote:Lenoir is up... only a few minutes away now.
Where? On tv?

Fox Sports News
And?
Really dragging this out....
Did he go on a mission? Lol
Duck24
Senior
Posts: 4744
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:36 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by Duck24 »

User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39331
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by greenyellow »

The Portland Oregon Club dinner will be filled with former Ducks, based on this photo that Akili posted.
Image
ducksrock
Senior
Posts: 2738
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:08 am

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by ducksrock »

Duck24 wrote:
Finally... Geez...I think I aged a year since this morning....lol
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8779
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

With the add of Lenoir this is a really good class. A TE, Falo especially, would have made it amazing.
Image
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9914
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by Phenom »

Lol Kellen. You can take the boy out of Eastern Oregon but you can't take the Eastern Oregon out of the boy.
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8779
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

Phenom wrote:Lol Kellen. You can take the boy out of Eastern Oregon but you can't take the Eastern Oregon out of the boy.
No doubt! Love it. :lol:
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39331
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by greenyellow »

Video of Lenoir committing.
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39331
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by greenyellow »

dthomas=ddixon wrote:With the add of Lenoir this is a really good class. A TE, Falo especially, would have made it amazing.
This class was basically a TE and a DE/OLB edge rusher away from being great.
Image
Cedar Tree
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 9:15 pm

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by Cedar Tree »

uostudent wrote:
Cedar Tree wrote:Not too worried about not getting Falo. We'll be fine. He seems kind of small for a TE anyway- 215 lbs?? I mean he could very well bulk up, but if he doesn't, there are a lot of D1 defenders who are gonna be licking their chops...
:lol: WDWHA

He's closer to the 235 that ESPN has him listed at - will likely end up playing at 250+. Great player who should flourish when given an opportunity.
Never said I/we didn't want him. Just saying it's not the end of the world...

Rivals has him at 216, but maybe it's off? Who knows. He sure doesn't look 235 in his commitment video though, and the camera is supposed to add 10 pounds :)
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9914
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by Phenom »

greenyellow wrote:
dthomas=ddixon wrote:With the add of Lenoir this is a really good class. A TE, Falo especially, would have made it amazing.
This class was basically a TE and a DE/OLB edge rusher away from being great.
Falo and Artis. :(
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39331
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by greenyellow »

Phenom wrote:
greenyellow wrote:
dthomas=ddixon wrote:With the add of Lenoir this is a really good class. A TE, Falo especially, would have made it amazing.
This class was basically a TE and a DE/OLB edge rusher away from being great.
Falo and Artis. :(
Getting those guys would have put Oregon near the top-15 so it was so close to being a great class, by Oregon standards.
Image
User avatar
QuackininBama
All Pac-12
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:55 am

Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)

Post by QuackininBama »

Eugene isn't exactly a favored destination, coach T is gonna have to prove this team is worth coming to by wins on the field.
Post Reply