New commit (not silent)

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39304
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by greenyellow »

wheaton4prez wrote:
mdm0302 wrote:is it bad that im not super excited about this guy...??? i mean with limited schollies this year and a huge win over usc i was hoping for gabe king, owa, and blue chippers.. maybe im just to into the rating systems
Look at this rating, know who selected the player, and be excited. :)

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/r ... yett-67890
He's turning out just fine. Oregon's coaches know how to recruit and find those underrated players early in the process.
Image
Pontius
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 257
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:45 am

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by Pontius »

Boyett was a 4 star on scout and Rivals sucks at rating the West Coast. Also, he was an early commit so that tends to trend down the rankings of sleepers.
damascusduck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by damascusduck »

Pontius wrote:Boyett was a 4 star on scout and Rivals sucks at rating the West Coast. Also, he was an early commit so that tends to trend down the rankings of sleepers.
Boyett was not a sleeper. He was California H.S. player of the year his senior year. Texas made a big push at the end to turn him, but he stuck to his early commit. He will be one of the best at Oregon before he's done.
User avatar
VinnyKnuckles
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 770
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: Oregon
Contact:

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by VinnyKnuckles »

Here is the free commitment story...

http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/in ... Recruiting
Image
User avatar
EncinitasDuck
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:45 pm
Location: Grants Pass Oregon

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by EncinitasDuck »

Love getting this kid, but he may need to change his name. :D
HugeInTheEug
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:31 pm

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by HugeInTheEug »

EncinitasDuck wrote:Love getting this kid, but he may need to change his name. :D
Tony Oregon > Tony Washington
User avatar
ncduck
Senior
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by ncduck »

I love it that not even Washington wants to be in Washington.
Pontius
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 257
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:45 am

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by Pontius »

Pontius wrote:Boyett was a 4 star on scout and Rivals sucks at rating the West Coast. Also, he was an early commit so that tends to trend down the rankings of sleepers.

He was a sleeper going into the season. Did you miss the part where I said he was a 4 star on scout? But they only added a 4th star towards the very end of the recruiting season. At the time of his commitment he didn't have any other Pac-10 offers I believe. Anyway, he was what I would consider a sleeper at the time of his commitment.
damascusduck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by damascusduck »

The definition of a sleeper is usually a low rated, late commit. Someone that shows up close to, or at LOI day. An under the radar type. Daryle Hawkins or Nick Cole were/are sleepers. Everyone knew about Boyett. He was the Ducks first or second commit and had a lot of offers. Scout doesn't do a very good job sometimes of showing that......Lavasier Tuinei was another that the Ducks were trying to hide out last year, but someone spilled the beans. Like Masoli, a JC kid that was a full qualifier at of HS.
HugeInTheEug
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:31 pm

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by HugeInTheEug »

damascusduck wrote:The definition of a sleeper is usually a low rated, late commit. Someone that shows up close to, or at LOI day. An under the radar type. Daryle Hawkins or Nick Cole were/are sleepers. Everyone knew about Boyett. He was the Ducks first or second commit and had a lot of offers. Scout doesn't do a very good job sometimes of showing that......Lavasier Tuinei was another that the Ducks were trying to hide out last year, but someone spilled the beans. Like Masoli, a JC kid that was a full qualifier at of HS.
Of our safeties, Javes Lewis would be considered more a sleeper. He was a real late commit.
Pontius
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 257
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:45 am

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by Pontius »

damascusduck wrote:The definition of a sleeper is usually a low rated, late commit. Someone that shows up close to, or at LOI day. An under the radar type. Daryle Hawkins or Nick Cole were/are sleepers. Everyone knew about Boyett. He was the Ducks first or second commit and had a lot of offers. Scout doesn't do a very good job sometimes of showing that......Lavasier Tuinei was another that the Ducks were trying to hide out last year, but someone spilled the beans. Like Masoli, a JC kid that was a full qualifier at of HS.

I'm sorry, I just disagree. Boyett did not have a lot of offers when the Ducks offered him. I was following recruiting pretty heavily at that point on scout and on rivals and it's what I recall. At the time he was often compared to the verbal of Maehl, another sleeper. Later on in the season after much hounding from educk, they gave him his 4th star.

Point aside, he was obviously a stud recruit and I'm glad the Duck coaches thought so highly of him to offer at such a point in time.
BisonDucks
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 283
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: New commit (not silent)

Post by BisonDucks »

We are getting some long athletic kids at DE/OLB...see Anderson, Arden, McCain, & Washington. Apparently Arden has quite the wingspan and speed to boot. We are definitely getting that hybrid OLB/DE in spades.
Post Reply