Dante eligible?

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Merganzer
Senior
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:42 am

Re: Dante eligible?

Post by Merganzer »

Tray Dub wrote:The oregonlive article has Altman saying even if he was approved by Michigan he still wouldn't play because he won't have practiced.
14: @ Michigan
18: Montana
21: the rematch with Texas Southern
29: Alabama State
Jan. 2 @ Colorado, It will be great to have the big guy in this one!
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39346
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Dante eligible?

Post by greenyellow »

Sounds like the earliest he'll play is Montana but maybe for only a few minutes, which means the Texas Southern or Alabama State games will be his first real extended action.
Image
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12825
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Dante eligible?

Post by woundedknees »

"We'll probably take him on the trip," said Altman. "He got in yesterday but he won't probably play [at Michigan]."

https://247sports.com/college/oregon/Ar ... 140371829/
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
Autzenoise
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:43 pm
Location: Pendleton

Re: Dante eligible?

Post by Autzenoise »

So what you're saying is there's a chance..... lol
"Canzano is to sports, what Jerry Springer is to news…"
User avatar
Quietduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:43 pm

Dante

Post by Quietduck »

I'm not going to put all my eggs in the Dante basket N'Faley basket, but if this kid can come in and give us slightly better than average rebounding and blocks without being an offensive liability this team is going to be very good. If he comes in and becomes a star I don't know where this team limit is. How do you guys view what will happen when he gets to starts playing?
User avatar
EncinitasDuck
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:45 pm
Location: Grants Pass Oregon

Re: Dante

Post by EncinitasDuck »

Well we certainly could use some inside threat on offense. PP can't keep delivering 40 minutes a game and being our only inside threat around the basket. So anything will help in my view even if its just an inside out to an open shooter. Between the Bahamas and now we have left so many shots on the rim its mind boggling. We need some kind of inside presence.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40687
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Dante

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Quietduck wrote:I'm not going to put all my eggs in the Dante basket N'Faley basket, but if this kid can come in and give us slightly better than average rebounding and blocks without being an offensive liability this team is going to be very good. If he comes in and becomes a star I don't know where this team limit is. How do you guys view what will happen when he gets to starts playing?
#14 recruit in the nation and #4 center in the nation. I think he'll be a solid contributor. May take him a few games, but I'm excited.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
GrantDuck
Senior
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:05 pm

Re: Dante

Post by GrantDuck »

Quietduck wrote:I'm not going to put all my eggs in the Dante basket N'Faley basket, but if this kid can come in and give us slightly better than average rebounding and blocks without being an offensive liability this team is going to be very good. If he comes in and becomes a star I don't know where this team limit is. How do you guys view what will happen when he gets to starts playing?
I think patience is the right approach, but his offensive game is not bad at all and he is potentially an elite level rebounder. He's not going to block shots like Bell/Wooten, but his presence will help defensively. He'll probably get called for about 15000 charges by Pac-12 refs for doing basic post moves where guys flop against him, because there's nothing else they can do. Like most freshman, turnovers, foul trouble, FT shooting will all probably be issues early.

Him against UW's big men coming up shortly is going to be a treat.
ICamel
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 195
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:16 am

Re: Dante

Post by ICamel »

GrantDuck wrote:He'll probably get called for about 15000 charges by Pac-12 refs for doing basic post moves where guys flop against him, because there's nothing else they can do.
Flopping is now a warning for the first offense and a "Class B" Technical foul for subsequent flops. With that written, the "flop" is always in the eyes of the official(s).
duckfan22
Senior
Posts: 2698
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: Dante

Post by duckfan22 »

ICamel wrote:
GrantDuck wrote:He'll probably get called for about 15000 charges by Pac-12 refs for doing basic post moves where guys flop against him, because there's nothing else they can do.
Flopping is now a warning for the first offense and a "Class B" Technical foul for subsequent flops. With that written, the "flop" is always in the eyes of the official(s).


"flop" is always in the eyes of the official(s) and no way will pac-12 officials get it right.
Post Reply