College football's big spenders

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4516
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

College football's big spenders

Post by nogerO »

Not sure if this has been posted but here goes anyway...

http://db.desmoinesregister.com/college ... recruiting

Average cost per win is interesting, looks like the Ducks are doing it right!
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
gogreen55
Senior
Posts: 2369
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:39 pm

Re: College football's big spenders

Post by gogreen55 »

According to that database, here is how the Pac-12 teams rank in terms of dollars spent on recruiting per victory. This is for 2009 through 2013.

Arizona State:: $43,666.00
Utah: $48,165.00
Oregon: $52,287.00
UCLA: $54,541.00
Oregon State: $55,222.00
Arizona: $56,812.00
Washington: $62,081.00
Washington State: $66,057.00
California: $78,824.00
Colorado: $162,784.00
RebelDuck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:54 am

Re: College football's big spenders

Post by RebelDuck »

Surprised to see Colorado at #19. Obviously, it didn’t work.
rockthief
Senior
Posts: 4780
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:52 am
Location: Stand By Me

Re: College football's big spenders

Post by rockthief »

Tennessee has a problem.
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4516
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: College football's big spenders

Post by nogerO »

rockthief wrote:Tennessee has a problem.
Their bagmen are paying the wrong people?
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
RanDux
Senior
Posts: 2840
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
Location: Happy Valley, OR

Re: College football's big spenders

Post by RanDux »

Surprised to see Ohio State at #35 and Wisconsin at #60. Those 2 schools are getting a lot of bang for their buck. Not surprised that 5 of the top 7 are SEC schools, broken up only by Oregon and 1 other school. I bet USC would be up there if their spending was made public.
Post Reply