1983 Draft Discussion

All Draft related information will be here

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15301
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

1983 Draft Discussion

Post by Oregon Ownage »

Use this thread to discuss the pick selections so the actual picks dont get lost in the shuffle
Image
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by chipper »

Woooo draft time!!! Curious who goes #2 and beyond.
Pacers GM.
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by chipper »

Also it says 3 hours during work week- is it untimed on weekend?
Pacers GM.
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15301
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by Oregon Ownage »

chipper wrote:Also it says 3 hours during work week- is it untimed on weekend?
Updated

It’s 2 hours
Image
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by lukeyrid13 »

So is Ralph Sampson truly the next Moses?
User avatar
the goat
Freshman
Posts: 1442
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:40 pm
GM: Los Angeles Lakers

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by the goat »

I'm really curious about who the Wiz take at 3
Lakers GM
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by chipper »

LOL I LOVE THAT MY PICK IN FBB WON THE LOTTO :lol: go f'n figure :lol:
Pacers GM.
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by chipper »

I am VERY curious who the Cavs pick here. Could go a number of directions honestly.
Pacers GM.
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by chipper »

Good pick and damn was hoping that wouldn't happen lol. Really was hoping he'd magically fall to 4 lol.
Pacers GM.
Briezy
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1013
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 4:04 pm
GM: Cleveland Cavaliers GM

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by Briezy »

Went Harper. Should pair well with Tucker.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Notes on Harper were solid. A 20ppg PG with good defense can be a game changer In FBB
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by chipper »

Yeah you can make an argument of sorts that,d epending on team need, he COULD have gone ahead of Sampson if a team was stacked at the big- because his notes are incredible.
Pacers GM.
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by jibbajabba614 »

chipper wrote:Yeah you can make an argument of sorts that,d epending on team need, he COULD have gone ahead of Sampson if a team was stacked at the big- because his notes are incredible.
Moses Malone was put in there for a reason. Made sure he would be the top pick. Harper is good, just not MVP good. Having a scoring PG does really help the league transition into more outside shooting teams.
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by chipper »

jibbajabba614 wrote:
chipper wrote:Yeah you can make an argument of sorts that,d epending on team need, he COULD have gone ahead of Sampson if a team was stacked at the big- because his notes are incredible.
Moses Malone was put in there for a reason. Made sure he would be the top pick. Harper is good, just not MVP good. Having a scoring PG does really help the league transition into more outside shooting teams.
Yeah and the PG position in FBB is so broken- it's why there are limits as to who can play it. PG is such an advantage in this game it's crazy.
Pacers GM.
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 1983 Draft Discussion

Post by jibbajabba614 »

chipper wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:
chipper wrote:Yeah you can make an argument of sorts that,d epending on team need, he COULD have gone ahead of Sampson if a team was stacked at the big- because his notes are incredible.
Moses Malone was put in there for a reason. Made sure he would be the top pick. Harper is good, just not MVP good. Having a scoring PG does really help the league transition into more outside shooting teams.
Yeah and the PG position in FBB is so broken- it's why there are limits as to who can play it. PG is such an advantage in this game it's crazy.
Zyme was the one who figured out the glitch in the game. Point guards with 70+ handles break the game. Reason why we try to keep them at a 30-40 range in the draft.
Post Reply