Grizzlies / Hawks

Post Completed Trades Here

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by offtheheezy »

Grizzlies Send:
Detlef Schrempf
World B. Free
Mirza Delibasic
Rickey Green
Spurs 86 1st

Hawks Send:
Otis Birdsong
Lorenzo Romar
Rick Carlisle

Birdsong was the best player I could get while keeping both the Pacers/Wolves 1st which I hope will be higher this year. Thanks to everyone who submitted offers, appreciate the time!

Lister and Birdsong reunited and both expire at the same time as Stockton. I'll be in a bit of a tricky situation cap wise for the next couple of years but not having bird rights on World B. Free or Rickey Green makes it hard for me to keep either player moving forward as well, along with already not having enough cap space for an impact player in FA this upcoming year.

Hawks need 1 cut for the trade.
User avatar
vincent1469
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
GM: Seattle Supersonics

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by vincent1469 »

I’m both confused and intrigued by the Grizzlies lol
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Grizzlies are looking solid now.

If Schrempf blows up it's a fine haul for the Hawks. Otherwise it's just a collection of minor assets.
User avatar
the goat
Freshman
Posts: 1442
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:40 pm
GM: Los Angeles Lakers

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by the goat »

Pretty cheap for the Grizzlies, who seem to have gotten good overnight.
Lakers GM
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by offtheheezy »

vincent1469 wrote:I’m both confused and intrigued by the Grizzlies lol
What’s confusing? :lol:
User avatar
vincent1469
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
GM: Seattle Supersonics

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by vincent1469 »

offtheheezy wrote:
vincent1469 wrote:I’m both confused and intrigued by the Grizzlies lol
What’s confusing? :lol:
Haha ig I didnt expect in one day for you to flip your youth into a contending team lmao
Marzeial
Freshman
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:19 pm
GM: Atlanta Hawks

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by Marzeial »

lukeyrid13 wrote:Grizzlies are looking solid now.

If Schrempf blows up it's a fine haul for the Hawks. Otherwise it's just a collection of minor assets.
Accepted. Cut Wright

Banking on Schrempf being good. Since he has a ton of upside and is in his first year. I think he's going to be a good one.

I liked him plus the Spurs 1st better than the two firsts I was offered by a couple teams since they would have been later choices. Way more value to me. I know I wasn't going to be able to pry out that Pacers pick but I'm hoping for some misfortune for the Spurs :shock:

Plus I'm OK with committing to my young guys and figuring out what I have in this logjam of youth at the 3.
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by offtheheezy »

Marzeial wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:Grizzlies are looking solid now.

If Schrempf blows up it's a fine haul for the Hawks. Otherwise it's just a collection of minor assets.
Accepted. Cut Wright

Banking on Schrempf being good. Since he has a ton of upside and is in his first year. I think he's going to be a good one.

I liked him plus the Spurs 1st better than the two firsts I was offered by a couple teams since they would have been later choices. Way more value to me. I know I wasn't going to be able to pry out that Pacers pick but I'm hoping for some misfortune for the Spurs :shock:

Plus I'm OK with committing to my young guys and figuring out what I have in this logjam of youth at the 3.
Yeah, I still like Schrempf - the way I see it is basically by the time he turns out to be good I’ll be so tight on cap space that I wouldn’t be able to improve my team. Giving myself a 3 year window :lol:
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40694
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Like it for Grizz.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
dd10snoop28
All Pac-12
Posts: 5046
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by dd10snoop28 »

A bust and mid-first for Birdsong.

The rebuilding teams are doing a bad job in getting value for their all-league players.
Image
User avatar
Cellar-door
Senior
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
GM: Charlotte Hornets

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by Cellar-door »

dd10snoop28 wrote:A bust and mid-first for Birdsong.

The rebuilding teams are doing a bad job in getting value for their all-league players.
Not 100% that Schrempf is a bust, but even then, I think he needed to hold out for Pacers 1st, or at the very least a future pick or two because Schrempf has a low floor.
Hornets GM
Marzeial
Freshman
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:19 pm
GM: Atlanta Hawks

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by Marzeial »

Cellar-door wrote:
dd10snoop28 wrote:A bust and mid-first for Birdsong.

The rebuilding teams are doing a bad job in getting value for their all-league players.
Not 100% that Schrempf is a bust, but even then, I think he needed to hold out for Pacers 1st, or at the very least a future pick or two because Schrempf has a low floor.
So we're labeling a rookie that was drafted #3 a bust already? I actually think his upside is better than what either of you two are giving him credit for but what do I know?

I've had these trade conversations for Birdsong the past few years and I feel as though I understand the value of my players.

Would I rather bet on the upside of Schrempf and a 15ish pick with upside, or take a late first next year, and a late first the following year from the teams towards the top of the food chain? To me that's a no brainer. I wouldn't have been able to pry the Pacers pick out of him and none of the other teams that would be picking higher had any interest in making a move for Birdsong.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by lukeyrid13 »

There’s no rush to trade him quite yet though. 80 more days til the deadline

Schrempf had a -1 first TC

He could still be good, but not a sure thing
User avatar
dd10snoop28
All Pac-12
Posts: 5046
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by dd10snoop28 »

Marzeial wrote:
Cellar-door wrote:
dd10snoop28 wrote:A bust and mid-first for Birdsong.

The rebuilding teams are doing a bad job in getting value for their all-league players.
Not 100% that Schrempf is a bust, but even then, I think he needed to hold out for Pacers 1st, or at the very least a future pick or two because Schrempf has a low floor.
So we're labeling a rookie that was drafted #3 a bust already? I actually think his upside is better than what either of you two are giving him credit for but what do I know?

I've had these trade conversations for Birdsong the past few years and I feel as though I understand the value of my players.

Would I rather bet on the upside of Schrempf and a 15ish pick with upside, or take a late first next year, and a late first the following year from the teams towards the top of the food chain? To me that's a no brainer. I wouldn't have been able to pry the Pacers pick out of him and none of the other teams that would be picking higher had any interest in making a move for Birdsong.
Not for sure, but -1 first TC is definitely a sign that he is a bust.

I would have suggested to go the future pick route. Competing teams are willing to trade picks in the future for ability to win now..
Image
User avatar
Cellar-door
Senior
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
GM: Charlotte Hornets

Re: Grizzlies / Hawks

Post by Cellar-door »

Marzeial wrote:
Cellar-door wrote:
dd10snoop28 wrote:A bust and mid-first for Birdsong.

The rebuilding teams are doing a bad job in getting value for their all-league players.
Not 100% that Schrempf is a bust, but even then, I think he needed to hold out for Pacers 1st, or at the very least a future pick or two because Schrempf has a low floor.
So we're labeling a rookie that was drafted #3 a bust already? I actually think his upside is better than what either of you two are giving him credit for but what do I know?

I've had these trade conversations for Birdsong the past few years and I feel as though I understand the value of my players.

Would I rather bet on the upside of Schrempf and a 15ish pick with upside, or take a late first next year, and a late first the following year from the teams towards the top of the food chain? To me that's a no brainer. I wouldn't have been able to pry the Pacers pick out of him and none of the other teams that would be picking higher had any interest in making a move for Birdsong.
I get the thought, though I think if not Pacers you should have gotten multiple picks. We're 3 sims in, you had time to move Birdsong.

For Schrempf, I don't think he's a bust, but part of the reason he went #3 (probably a mini-reach) was the idea that he had quick potential. He didn't develop his first year, a bad sign, and his notes were that he might have limitations on his physical stats (quickness/strength). I think he's got a chance to be good, but at the same time think you could have held out for more value.
Hornets GM
Post Reply