Pacers/Grizzlies

Post Completed Trades Here

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by chipper »

Pacers trade:
93 first
94 first (lotto protected forever)

Grizzlies trade:
Dominique Wilkins

Bah. It's an overpay for a guy that's expiring and who had lower numbers as a non-option, but I'm a Hawks fan and I finally get 'Nique. Hopefully the picks will be really, really low.

(process my free cut in draft contracts first so I have JUST enough cap space for 'Nique lol)

D-Rob/Vaught/'Nique/Macon/Jackson should work well for me. Still have my MLE too to fill out the depth.
Pacers GM.
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by offtheheezy »

Accept

Didn't necessarily want to move him but will have gotten into hard cap troubles soon. Opens up a bit of flexibility for me this season and had a run without him so still confident I’ll be a strong team
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15301
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by Oregon Ownage »

Not a deal I would do but we know Chipper is in love with Nique and as a fellow GM, I can appreciate an overpay b/c it helps set the market for other deals :)

Added the '94 pick to the futures thread

Done
Image
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by jibbajabba614 »

Sorry but you could have had a max deal and still traded Micheaux for Nique. Should have waited after free agency..
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40708
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by UOducksTK1 »

jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry but you could have had a max deal and still traded Micheaux for Nique. Should have waited after free agency..
100%. Bad for chipper

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by chipper »

jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry but you could have had a max deal and still traded Micheaux for Nique. Should have waited after free agency..
I had my max targets and didn’t get them. After Day 1 I saw no one else as worthy of a max. No reason to wait for me to get going on my roster building.
Pacers GM.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40708
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by UOducksTK1 »

chipper wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry but you could have had a max deal and still traded Micheaux for Nique. Should have waited after free agency..
I had my max targets and didn’t get them. After Day 1 I saw no one else as worthy of a max. No reason to wait for me to get going on my roster building.
You could have had Alaire or Buck for less money and for free. Makes no sense to give up those picks for something you could have signed.

Then you could have had Alaire AND Wilkins. Not well thought out this time bro.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by chipper »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
chipper wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry but you could have had a max deal and still traded Micheaux for Nique. Should have waited after free agency..
I had my max targets and didn’t get them. After Day 1 I saw no one else as worthy of a max. No reason to wait for me to get going on my roster building.
You could have had Alaire or Buck for less money and for free. Makes no sense to give up those picks for something you could have signed.

Then you could have had Alaire AND Wilkins. Not well thought out this time bro.
I wouldn't have offered Alaire or Buck what it took to get them on that day so that's a moot point.
Pacers GM.
User avatar
The Bean Regime
Senior
Posts: 2644
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by The Bean Regime »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
chipper wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry but you could have had a max deal and still traded Micheaux for Nique. Should have waited after free agency..
I had my max targets and didn’t get them. After Day 1 I saw no one else as worthy of a max. No reason to wait for me to get going on my roster building.
You could have had Alaire or Buck for less money and for free. Makes no sense to give up those picks for something you could have signed.

Then you could have had Alaire AND Wilkins. Not well thought out this time bro.
I mean, I agree, but you name those guys? Alarie got the max 2 year, and Buck got 17M. Where's the less money? I mean, I guess you could do Alarie for like 10.5M 3 yr and it'd still be less technically but that's beside the point. :P
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by chipper »

The Bean Regime wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:
chipper wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry but you could have had a max deal and still traded Micheaux for Nique. Should have waited after free agency..
I had my max targets and didn’t get them. After Day 1 I saw no one else as worthy of a max. No reason to wait for me to get going on my roster building.
You could have had Alaire or Buck for less money and for free. Makes no sense to give up those picks for something you could have signed.

Then you could have had Alaire AND Wilkins. Not well thought out this time bro.
I mean, I agree, but you name those guys? Alarie got the max 2 year, and Buck got 17M. Where's the less money? I mean, I guess you could do Alarie for like 10.5M 3 yr and it'd still be less technically but that's beside the point. :P
Right- exactly.
Pacers GM.
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by jibbajabba614 »

I think what me and TK both meant is you had 12 million to play with to get depth even if they were on 1 year deals. U mentioned your MLE. So you technically had 3 MLE to play with but instead you ended up with 1 if you waited a couple more days to process trade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
chipper
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by chipper »

jibbajabba614 wrote:I think what me and TK both meant is you had 12 million to play with to get depth even if they were on 1 year deals. U mentioned your MLE. So you technically had 3 MLE to play with but instead you ended up with 1 if you waited a couple more days to process trade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ok I can understand that- that’s a fair statement. I could have waited until after today for sure.
Pacers GM.
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by offtheheezy »

chipper wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:I think what me and TK both meant is you had 12 million to play with to get depth even if they were on 1 year deals. U mentioned your MLE. So you technically had 3 MLE to play with but instead you ended up with 1 if you waited a couple more days to process trade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ok I can understand that- that’s a fair statement. I could have waited until after today for sure.
I appreciate the fact that I wouldn't need Larry Micheaux on a 1 year $12M deal. These haters
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40708
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by UOducksTK1 »

The Bean Regime wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:
chipper wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry but you could have had a max deal and still traded Micheaux for Nique. Should have waited after free agency..
I had my max targets and didn’t get them. After Day 1 I saw no one else as worthy of a max. No reason to wait for me to get going on my roster building.
You could have had Alaire or Buck for less money and for free. Makes no sense to give up those picks for something you could have signed.

Then you could have had Alaire AND Wilkins. Not well thought out this time bro.
I mean, I agree, but you name those guys? Alarie got the max 2 year, and Buck got 17M. Where's the less money? I mean, I guess you could do Alarie for like 10.5M 3 yr and it'd still be less technically but that's beside the point. :P
I thought Buck got 12 mil, not 17. And if Alarie got offered 11 mil, first year salary almost always trumps years/increases. So right now Chipper could have easily had Alarie and Dom right now for those two firsts.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40708
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Pacers/Grizzlies

Post by UOducksTK1 »

jibbajabba614 wrote:I think what me and TK both meant is you had 12 million to play with to get depth even if they were on 1 year deals. U mentioned your MLE. So you technically had 3 MLE to play with but instead you ended up with 1 if you waited a couple more days to process trade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
THIS^ My examples weren't the best, but the principle is still true.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
Post Reply