Eh, perhaps I could have done it that way, but it's Dominique so normal procedure goes out the window when he's involved.UOducksTK1 wrote:THIS^ My examples weren't the best, but the principle is still true.jibbajabba614 wrote:I think what me and TK both meant is you had 12 million to play with to get depth even if they were on 1 year deals. U mentioned your MLE. So you technically had 3 MLE to play with but instead you ended up with 1 if you waited a couple more days to process trade.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pacers/Grizzlies
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
-
chipper
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- GM: Indiana Pacers
Re: Pacers/Grizzlies
Pacers GM.
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: Pacers/Grizzlies
ILLEGAL ONE YEAR MAX! Guys stop trying to pseudo-retroactively make me take MICHEAUXUOducksTK1 wrote:I thought Buck got 12 mil, not 17. And if Alarie got offered 11 mil, first year salary almost always trumps years/increases. So right now Chipper could have easily had Alarie and Dom right now for those two firsts.The Bean Regime wrote:I mean, I agree, but you name those guys? Alarie got the max 2 year, and Buck got 17M. Where's the less money? I mean, I guess you could do Alarie for like 10.5M 3 yr and it'd still be less technically but that's beside the point.UOducksTK1 wrote:You could have had Alaire or Buck for less money and for free. Makes no sense to give up those picks for something you could have signed.chipper wrote:I had my max targets and didn’t get them. After Day 1 I saw no one else as worthy of a max. No reason to wait for me to get going on my roster building.jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry but you could have had a max deal and still traded Micheaux for Nique. Should have waited after free agency..
Then you could have had Alaire AND Wilkins. Not well thought out this time bro.