Team Rankings

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
RanDux
Senior
Posts: 2840
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
Location: Happy Valley, OR

Team Rankings

Post by RanDux »

Whelp, we finished #3 in the Pac-12 this year at #25 overall. Stanford was #1, at #17 overall, and surprising Arizona finished just ahead of us at #24. Jonathan Smith led the resurgent Beavers to the 6th best finish at #55.Even with all their fire power, USC finished a dismal 10th in the Pac-12 at #65 overall, finishing ahead of only UW and that train wreck of a program, ASU. Herman is going to be squirming next year! Speaking of UW, the mighty Fuskies finished 11th in the league with a woeful 93rd overall, finishing just ahead of the likes of #94 Central Michigan, #95 Kent State, #96 Ball State, and #97 power house New Mexico, leading the Husky faithful to much weeping and gnashing of teeth!

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Last edited by RanDux on Wed Feb 02, 2022 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pdxduck2013
Freshman
Posts: 1431
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 5:20 pm

Re: Team Rankings

Post by pdxduck2013 »

RanDux wrote:Whelp, we finished #2 in the Pac-12 this year at #25 overall. Stanford was #1, at #17 overall. Jonathan Smith led the resurgent Beavers to the

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Which site's ratings are you using? On 247, they have Arizona right ahead of us at #24.
RanDux
Senior
Posts: 2840
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
Location: Happy Valley, OR

Re: Team Rankings

Post by RanDux »

RanDux wrote:Whelp, we finished #3 in the Pac-12 this year at #25 overall. Stanford was #1, at #17 overall, and surprising Arizona finished just ahead of us at #24. Jonathan Smith led the resurgent Beavers to the 6th best finish at #55.Even with all their fire power, USC finished a dismal 10th in the Pac-12 at #65 overall, finishing ahead of only UW and that train wreck of a program, ASU. Herman is going to be squirming next year! Speaking of UW, the mighty Fuskies finished 11th in the league with a woeful 93rd overall, finishing just ahead of the likes of #94 Central Michigan, #95 Kent State, #96 Ball State, and #97 power house New Mexico, leading the Husky faithful to much weeping and gnashing of teeth!

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
And in a final note, Cristobal's Canes did finish ahead of all Pac-12 schools at #15.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
RanDux
Senior
Posts: 2840
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
Location: Happy Valley, OR

Re: Team Rankings

Post by RanDux »

pdxduck2013 wrote:
RanDux wrote:Whelp, we finished #2 in the Pac-12 this year at #25 overall. Stanford was #1, at #17 overall. Jonathan Smith led the resurgent Beavers to the

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Which site's ratings are you using? On 247, they have Arizona right ahead of us at #24.
Yup, I fixed it. Thanks.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
User avatar
DmoneyDuck
Sophomore
Posts: 1587
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Team Rankings

Post by DmoneyDuck »

Still a chance to add Conerly in March, too
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Team Rankings

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Where do we fall with average player ranking? cause we only took 15 players this year
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40543
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Team Rankings

Post by UOducksTK1 »

lukeyrid13 wrote:Where do we fall with average player ranking? cause we only took 15 players this year
15th

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
ducks5ever
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 936
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:15 pm

Re: Team Rankings

Post by ducks5ever »

RanDux wrote:Even with all their fire power, USC finished a dismal 10th in the Pac-12 at #65 overall, finishing ahead of only UW and that train wreck of a program, ASU.

While that is what 247 says, I don't think it accurately portrays what's going on. USC signed 8 guys but took 13 transfers. There's no way a 21 person class of that caliber is #65.
alxtw
Freshman
Posts: 1262
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:46 pm

Re: Team Rankings

Post by alxtw »

ducks5ever wrote:
RanDux wrote:Even with all their fire power, USC finished a dismal 10th in the Pac-12 at #65 overall, finishing ahead of only UW and that train wreck of a program, ASU.

While that is what 247 says, I don't think it accurately portrays what's going on. USC signed 8 guys but took 13 transfers. There's no way a 21 person class of that caliber is #65.
Transfers arent included in the rankings?
User avatar
GoDucksTroll
Sophomore
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:34 am

Re: Team Rankings

Post by GoDucksTroll »

In the unlikely event Oregon adds Conerly then they jump up to #12. But with Harbaugh sticking with Michigan it’s even less likely.

Fun fact: for all the talk about how much easier it is to recruit at Miami we’ve out recruited them on average over the last dozen years, and haven’t had classes as bad as theirs even during the Helf downturn.

Impressive class for Arizona given their circumstances. They got a handful of recruits I would prefer were Ducks. Whomp whomp for Washington and Arizona State.
User avatar
Zyme
All Pac-12
Posts: 5579
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
GM: New York Knicks GM

Re: Team Rankings

Post by Zyme »

alxtw wrote:
ducks5ever wrote:
RanDux wrote:Even with all their fire power, USC finished a dismal 10th in the Pac-12 at #65 overall, finishing ahead of only UW and that train wreck of a program, ASU.

While that is what 247 says, I don't think it accurately portrays what's going on. USC signed 8 guys but took 13 transfers. There's no way a 21 person class of that caliber is #65.
Transfers arent included in the rankings?
Correct
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94

K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
Post Reply