Stanford @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 1, Sat 8 PM FS1)

[spacefrog13x]

I think Butterfield is similar to Ashford but a much better arm.

Similar? You would be hard pressed to come up with an example of two quarterbacks that are more different.

Here is the thing I get that they have a reputation of being completely different. However, Ashford is a better thrower than people think, and Butterfield is a much better runner than people think so they are actually pretty similar in a lot of ways.

Totally the same except one runs a 4.6 40 and the other runs a 5.0 40

[buckmarkduck]

I think Butterfield is similar to Ashford but a much better arm.

Similar? You would be hard pressed to come up with an example of two quarterbacks that are more different.

Here is the thing I get that they have a reputation of being completely different. However, Ashford is a better thrower than people think, and Butterfield is a much better runner than people think so they are actually pretty similar in a lot of ways.

Ashford isn’t very good. I don’t understand what you have seen to think you would be happy with him as starting QB?

[StevensTechU]

Ashford isn’t very good. I don’t understand what you have seen to think you would be happy with him as starting QB?

If you only watch highlights, I could see how one might think we made mistake letting him go. If you watch the games, woof. He's 50/50 on hitting the broad side of a barn still.

[buckmarkduck]

Ashford isn’t very good. I don’t understand what you have seen to think you would be happy with him as starting QB?

If you only watch highlights, I could see how one might think we made mistake letting him go. If you watch the games, woof. He's 50/50 on hitting the broad side of a barn still.

I’ve watched two of his games, and neither have made me long for him to be back at UO. I’ve got no hate for him and he landed at maybe the only power 5 school he could get playing time for. He would have been awesome in a Nebraska uni circa 1995.

[chapelhillduck]

Ashford isn’t very good. I don’t understand what you have seen to think you would be happy with him as starting QB?

If you only watch highlights, I could see how one might think we made mistake letting him go. If you watch the games, woof. He's 50/50 on hitting the broad side of a barn still.

I’ve watched two of his games, and neither have made me long for him to be back at UO. I’ve got no hate for him and he landed at maybe the only power 5 school he could get playing time for. He would have been awesome in a Nebraska uni circa 1995.

He’d be great at Ga Tech


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[droop10]

Ashford isn’t very good. I don’t understand what you have seen to think you would be happy with him as starting QB?

If you only watch highlights, I could see how one might think we made mistake letting him go. If you watch the games, woof. He's 50/50 on hitting the broad side of a barn still.

I’ve watched two of his games, and neither have made me long for him to be back at UO. I’ve got no hate for him and he landed at maybe the only power 5 school he could get playing time for. He would have been awesome in a Nebraska uni circa 1995.

He’d be great at Ga Tech


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They haven't run the triple option in 5 years.

[chapelhillduck]

Ashford isn’t very good. I don’t understand what you have seen to think you would be happy with him as starting QB?

If you only watch highlights, I could see how one might think we made mistake letting him go. If you watch the games, woof. He's 50/50 on hitting the broad side of a barn still.

I’ve watched two of his games, and neither have made me long for him to be back at UO. I’ve got no hate for him and he landed at maybe the only power 5 school he could get playing time for. He would have been awesome in a Nebraska uni circa 1995.

He’d be great at Ga Tech


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They haven't run the triple option in 5 years.

Shows how much ga tech football I’ve watched lately:)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk