Week 7 CFB Discussion

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by greenyellow »

After tonight, at least least 4 of the 15 undefeated teams will have lost today.
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by greenyellow »

Stanford is up 10-0 on Notre Dame in the 3rd. ND is just garbage without a decent QB.
Image
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11017
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by buckmarkduck »

DuckzRule wrote:USC is beating Utah by 14, I'm now scared of potentially meeting them in the Conference Champiosnhip.

I guess if you believe Utah is all that good. They lost to a middle of the pack Florida team, and got dominated by UCLA.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by greenyellow »

Stanford gets their first FBS win in over a year by beating ND in South Bend.
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by greenyellow »

USC/Utah may come down to whoever has the ball last.
Image
User avatar
OregonFan4Life
All-American
Posts: 15385
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by OregonFan4Life »

I thought Utah’s defense was supposed to be good.
Image
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by Duck07 »

OregonFan4Life wrote:I thought Utah’s defense was supposed to be good.
Well can they keep SC out of FG range is all the good they have to be now.
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by greenyellow »

Once again, USC's defense got exposed by a semi-competent offense.
Image
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by Duck07 »

Utah 43-42 over the P12 and USC.

I still cannot fathom that this league continues to try and give USC the benefit of the doubt with officiating in games (to say nothing of a few absolute horse-pucky calls/decisions in the OSU game, this one like granting USC a timeout during a Utah INT return on a DPI) knowing that they're leaving and tried to kill the conference.
Image
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by StevensTechU »

Man, I picked a good day to be a couch potato and watch football all day long. USC -Utah and Alabama-Tennessee were great. Wish I would've caught TCU-Okie State.

Ducks will move up in the polls but not sure how far. I'm guessing UCLA is #9 and Oregon is #10, with USC, Penn State and OKST dropping but TCU jumping us.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40701
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Why did 5 seconds get added to give USC 13 seconds after the pass interference call? I was so confused.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by StevensTechU »

UOducksTK1 wrote:Why did 5 seconds get added to give USC 13 seconds after the pass interference call? I was so confused.
I don't know, but according to social media USC fans, the refs are the only reason they lost.
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 6442
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by pezsez1 »

Why did 5 seconds get added to give USC 13 seconds after the pass interference call? I was so confused.
And also, why was the USC player not flagged at the end of the play for slamming down the Utah player after they were like 10 feet out of bounds? The ref was right there. No flag.

Yeah, seeing the Pac-12 simping for USC under these circumstances is painful.

I don't even care that USC losing might hurt our playoff potential. I was thrilled to watch them lose (they should have lost to OSU, too) and I hope they lose again.

Great day of football! Excited for next weekend. Now THAT will be a game.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8800
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

StevensTechU wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:Why did 5 seconds get added to give USC 13 seconds after the pass interference call? I was so confused.
I don't know, but according to social media USC fans, the refs are the only reason they lost.
From what I’ve been seeing on Twitter, they allowed SC to retroactively use a timeout mid-play, at the moment of the interception. They were all over the place the entire game.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Image
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4517
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: Week 7 CFB Discussion

Post by nogerO »

squintsdd wrote:
nogerO wrote:Could be a matchup of top ten teams and gameday at Autzen. 3 top 10 teams lost already.
Oregon likely won't move in the polls
We'll see...

https://www.espn.com/college-football/rankings
Last edited by nogerO on Sun Oct 16, 2022 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
Post Reply