#9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Network)
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- QuackininBama
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5728
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:55 am
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
Guys.........I've been watching this team a long, long time. Is this not one of the most fundamentally sound teams we've ever seen at Oregon?
This might be one of the best teams Oregon has ever fielded.
This might be one of the best teams Oregon has ever fielded.
- JIDuck97
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:42 am
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
While I want to say yes I'm a Duck fan so best answer is we'll wait and see at the very end of the season.QuackininBama wrote:Guys.........I've been watching this team a long, long time. Is this not one of the most fundamentally sound teams we've ever seen at Oregon?
This might be one of the best teams Oregon has ever fielded.
- brich75
- Senior
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:27 pm
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
It’s hard not to feel this way. Other teams would have continued to struggle and imploded. The only Oregon team I was positive would never lose was Dennis Dixon before the injury.QuackininBama wrote:Guys.........I've been watching this team a long, long time. Is this not one of the most fundamentally sound teams we've ever seen at Oregon?
This might be one of the best teams Oregon has ever fielded.
- OregonFan4Life
- All-American
- Posts: 15385
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
Fun game, kinda funny that with a slow start and Stanford doing everything they can they only jump up 6-0 with two field goals including a 53 yard field goal. But ducks can’t start that slow the next 3 games.
Easy win, almost fully healthy, hoping Jackson’s injuries were minor and Addison and Jacobs are healthy for the Huskies.
Easy win, almost fully healthy, hoping Jackson’s injuries were minor and Addison and Jacobs are healthy for the Huskies.

-
bdkipe
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 4:09 pm
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
I’m concerned Popo only got one series and then left the game. That dude is a difference making disruption. Gonna need him to keep Penix, Williams, etc running for their lives and uncomfortable. Losing Khyree and Popo before UW? Thank you 6lb 8oz Baby Geez for bye weeks.
-
bellsduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3851
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
- GM: Utah Jazz
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
I expect Oregon to pass USC tomorrow in the rankings.
- EncinitasDuck
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:45 pm
- Location: Grants Pass Oregon
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
Couldn't agree more! When's the last time you saw a head coach head to the stands to thank the fans, shake hands and sign autographs! He was there before the players. Class Act!ducks5ever wrote:Love to see Lanning build his progrum by personally greeting the fans who traveled
- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
Hopefully Lanning learned a lesson. When we win the toss take the damn ball and get the mo going. Stanford showed everybody how to slow us down. Chip never deferred much...OregonFan4Life wrote:Fun game, kinda funny that with a slow start and Stanford doing everything they can they only jump up 6-0 with two field goals including a 53 yard field goal. But ducks can’t start that slow the next 3 games.
Easy win, almost fully healthy, hoping Jackson’s injuries were minor and Addison and Jacobs are healthy for the Huskies.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40687
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
Same. Oregon has played one team with a winning record (Colorado 3-2).JIDuck97 wrote:While I want to say yes I'm a Duck fan so best answer is we'll wait and see at the very end of the season.QuackininBama wrote:Guys.........I've been watching this team a long, long time. Is this not one of the most fundamentally sound teams we've ever seen at Oregon?
This might be one of the best teams Oregon has ever fielded.
Also we have yet to play a top 5 team in the PAC-12 yet (Washington, USC, Oregon State, Utah, Wazzu). So once we play two of those teams, I’ll feel more comfortable saying this is the most complete Oregon Team.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
We allowed 6 points.ducks5ever wrote:Q1 over. 0-3 Stanford.
Oregon ran just 3 plays. Can't wait to see what how the "Oregon defense is amazing" squad spin this one. I do expect the defense to figure it out and play better though.
Defense played 27 snaps, ILB's have only 3 tackles (all by Boettcher)..... same old, same old

-
73duck
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:20 am
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
I was critical of the coaching staff after the TT game, but am thoroughly impressed now. The way they set up the FG try at the end of the half was an excellent combination of coaching and execution. Even with Jackson down, the DBs allowed no separation and avoid PIs with proper technique. I'm not spotting any weaknesses on either side of the ball.
-
buckmarkduck
- All-American
- Posts: 11017
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
bdkipe wrote:I’m concerned Popo only got one series and then left the game. That dude is a difference making disruption. Gonna need him to keep Penix, Williams, etc running for their lives and uncomfortable. Losing Khyree and Popo before UW? Thank you 6lb 8oz Baby Geez for bye weeks.
He didn’t play at all.
-
buckmarkduck
- All-American
- Posts: 11017
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
Duck07 wrote:We allowed 6 points.ducks5ever wrote:Q1 over. 0-3 Stanford.
Oregon ran just 3 plays. Can't wait to see what how the "Oregon defense is amazing" squad spin this one. I do expect the defense to figure it out and play better though.
Defense played 27 snaps, ILB's have only 3 tackles (all by Boettcher)..... same old, same old
Lots of fans who jumped on with Chip and can’t give credit to any other Duck teams.
-
dthomas=ddixon
- Moderator

- Posts: 8798
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
- Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
And they forget that even Chip’s teams had plenty of frustrations and weaknesses. They were also playing in a very weak Pac-10. Some of the season were straight up boring because the rest of the conference was so bad.buckmarkduck wrote:Duck07 wrote:We allowed 6 points.ducks5ever wrote:Q1 over. 0-3 Stanford.
Oregon ran just 3 plays. Can't wait to see what how the "Oregon defense is amazing" squad spin this one. I do expect the defense to figure it out and play better though.
Defense played 27 snaps, ILB's have only 3 tackles (all by Boettcher)..... same old, same old
Lots of fans who jumped on with Chip and can’t give credit to any other Duck teams.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

-
dthomas=ddixon
- Moderator

- Posts: 8798
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
- Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Re: #9 Oregon @ Stanford (Sept 30, Sat 3:30 PM Pac-12 Networ
As far as the slow start goes, I think a lot of people forget that there’s an opposing team and staff that throws everything they have at the Ducks when they come to town.
TTU was so set on keeping their new playbook under wraps for their game against us that they were willing to lose to Wyoming. Furd came out yesterday with a new defensive plan. Obviously we couldn’t have anticipated something we’d never seen them do before and it took a few drives to adjust. That’s football; it’s what desperate teams do to try to make the game somewhere competitive for as long as they can, not a sign of some previously undiscovered weakness.
TTU did the same thing with their QB power offense. You really think UW will come out and run Penix with QB power to catch us off guard? I’m sure they’ll have some wrinkles but they’re going to run their offense because they aren’t a bottom feeder needing tricks to compete with us.
TTU was so set on keeping their new playbook under wraps for their game against us that they were willing to lose to Wyoming. Furd came out yesterday with a new defensive plan. Obviously we couldn’t have anticipated something we’d never seen them do before and it took a few drives to adjust. That’s football; it’s what desperate teams do to try to make the game somewhere competitive for as long as they can, not a sign of some previously undiscovered weakness.
TTU did the same thing with their QB power offense. You really think UW will come out and run Penix with QB power to catch us off guard? I’m sure they’ll have some wrinkles but they’re going to run their offense because they aren’t a bottom feeder needing tricks to compete with us.

