Would you rather...
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
-
dthomas=ddixon
- Moderator

- Posts: 8779
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
- Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Re: Would you rather...
Yeah next years Dline should be better simpley because our depth will be much better. Kelly has raved about Hart & Anderson on the scout team & I would expect them to be a big part of the rotation. Add in the size of Iupati, Killikipi, & Touiasospo and thats some good depth not even counting the guys we're bringing in with this class. I would expect Terrell Turner to take Tukuafu's spot. He was the guy right behing Tu this year & played really good when he got in. He actually had more sacks than Tukuafu.

- shear_j
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:42 pm
- Location: Astoria/Klamath Falls OR
Re: Would you rather...
I was actually a little dissapointed (probably a little too strong of a word) with Tukuafu this year. I know that defenses were keying on him more with Reed, Linahan, and Harris but I really thought he would take that next step and replace Nick Reed as that dominant pass rusher.dthomas=ddixon wrote:Yeah next years Dline should be better simpley because our depth will be much better. Kelly has raved about Hart & Anderson on the scout team & I would expect them to be a big part of the rotation. Add in the size of Iupati, Killikipi, & Touiasospo and thats some good depth not even counting the guys we're bringing in with this class. I would expect Terrell Turner to take Tukuafu's spot. He was the guy right behing Tu this year & played really good when he got in. He actually had more sacks than Tukuafu.
- briarduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3183
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
- Location: Milwaukie OR
Re: Would you rather...
He did well and he was IMO the reason Rowe had such a great year!
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
-
bigfootlebowski
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:10 am
Re: Would you rather...
I agree, if we miss on the big time recruits, take as many jcs lineman that we think can help, someone may emerge from the group as a force. We have playmakers at every other position, another rb wont fix the DL.chicagoduck wrote:No one is answering your question! I will take a stab at it. I'd plug the holes with JC lineman, using our allocated spots for DLs, rather than shift those spots to other positions. We already have another RB spot, so we are covered there. Don't need another QB. Have plenty of OLs. Too many tight ends! Lots of LBs and DBs. Maybe a receiver spot, but we don't seem to be in on any one there except Lowe, and I think we have a spot for him already. So, I say we use the DL spots for DLs, and if that means JC, so be it.