Biased logic discounting Oregon
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
-
Merganzer
- Senior
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:42 am
Biased logic discounting Oregon
The first part is the idea that beating a good team twice is hard, so following that, Ohio State wins the Rose Bowl. But, if Oregon had lost the Oct.12 game, I don't think they'd be favored in the Rose Bowl. Another instance that's bit faulty was found in a article I came across with "why each team can't win the championship."
less
The other teams were cited for less than stellar talent in the trenches, suspect QB play, etc., etc. For Oregon: "They've just won too many games, bound for a loss" I've never heard that about an undefeated team going for the Natty before.
less
The other teams were cited for less than stellar talent in the trenches, suspect QB play, etc., etc. For Oregon: "They've just won too many games, bound for a loss" I've never heard that about an undefeated team going for the Natty before.
- DuckMastaFunk
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:07 pm
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
Yeah, the beating a good team twice is impossible argument is essentially saying that we’d have a better shot if we lost the last game. Makes zero sense.
- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
I find it interesting that all the playoff championship bowl games are on eSECpn. Really hoping Texas and Georgia lose.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
- duckpoint
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:42 am
- Location: Idaho
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
ESPN has exclusive media deals with both the CFP & SEC, thus the controversial (conflict of interest) narratives being pushed by the ESPN talking heads...nogerO wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2024 2:35 pm I find it interesting that all the playoff championship bowl games are on eSECpn. Really hoping Texas and Georgia lose.
https://collegefootballplayoff.com/news ... -2032.aspx
https://www.secsports.com/news/2020/12/ ... -agreementESPN Retains Exclusive Worldwide Rights to All Rounds of the Expanded College Football Playoff, the Second Largest Annual Sporting Event in the U.S.
Starting in 2026-27, the College Football Playoff National Championship Will Be Broadcast on ABC in Addition to ESPN's Signature MegaCast Presentation
Extension Includes Broad College Football Playoff Distribution Rights for Walt Disney Company Linear and Direct-to-Consumer Platforms and Offerings, Expanded Sales and Sponsorship Program for Disney Advertising
BIRMINGHAM, Alabama (December 10, 2020) - The Southeastern Conference and ESPN have finalized a milestone 10-year agreement that grants ABC and ESPN exclusive broadcast rights to premier SEC football and basketball events beginning in 2024-25 and continuing through 2033-34, as announced today by Greg Sankey, SEC Commissioner, and Jimmy Pitaro, Chairman, ESPN and Sports Content.
The landmark deal, which represents a significant expansion of the conference's current partnership with ESPN, will establish ABC as the new broadcast network home for Saturday afternoon SEC football games, as well as selected Saturday primetime football games and the annual SEC Football Championship Game, which has grown into one of the most popular sporting events of the year. In addition, approximately eight incremental marquee men's basketball games will be featured across ABC or ESPN.
- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
10 more years of this s***. I think strength of schedule should definitely be figured in. Also if the SEC insists on playing an 8-game conference schedule, the other major conferences should do the same. AND schedule the Mercer, Charleston Southerns, Central Arkansas, Austin Peay and Ball States of the world. SEC bias is alive and well and needs to be taken apart. IF they get control of the college football playoff committee it's only going to get worse. Not to say it hasn't already on some things.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
There's some stat showing in the post-season its 16-7 in favor of the losing team in the rematch which is where some of that comes from.DuckMastaFunk wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2024 2:08 pm Yeah, the beating a good team twice is impossible argument is essentially saying that we’d have a better shot if we lost the last game. Makes zero sense.
We can lose this game, but it isn't because of some inane reason like we won the first one FFS. All that stat shows is that over the course of a season teams can change and that really good teams are capable of beating one another - that's not exactly a grand revelation to cling to.

-
SuperDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Contact:
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
I heard there's only one more year of this format and then they'll likely increase the field to 14 yeams.nogerO wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2024 3:13 pm 10 more years of this s***. I think strength of schedule should definitely be figured in. Also if the SEC insists on playing an 8-game conference schedule, the other major conferences should do the same. AND schedule the Mercer, Charleston Southerns, Central Arkansas, Austin Peay and Ball States of the world. SEC bias is alive and well and needs to be taken apart. IF they get control of the college football playoff committee it's only going to get worse. Not to say it hasn't already on some things.
It's almost a certainty that they'll change the seeding process so conference champs don't get automatic first round bye's as well as seeding with the best teams at the top.
John 3:36
- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
AND, make sure 2 more SEC teams make the field. Take it to the bank.SuperDuck wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2024 3:22 pmI heard there's only one more year of this format and then they'll likely increase the field to 14 yeams.nogerO wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2024 3:13 pm 10 more years of this s***. I think strength of schedule should definitely be figured in. Also if the SEC insists on playing an 8-game conference schedule, the other major conferences should do the same. AND schedule the Mercer, Charleston Southerns, Central Arkansas, Austin Peay and Ball States of the world. SEC bias is alive and well and needs to be taken apart. IF they get control of the college football playoff committee it's only going to get worse. Not to say it hasn't already on some things.
It's almost a certainty that they'll change the seeding process so conference champs don't get automatic first round bye's as well as seeding with the best teams at the top.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
-
73duck
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:20 am
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
I once had a friend who played college ball tell me years ago that the winner of the first game has the advantage; self-confidence vs. self-doubt.
-
buckmarkduck
- All-American
- Posts: 11017
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
If we pounce on them early, like we did to Pennn st. They won’t battle back imo.
- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
I'll start by saying I think all college podcasts save for 2 ("The Solid Verbal" and "Ari and Andy", with the former being the best by a wide margin) are garbage. Like commentators, it's clear how many don't do any homework at all and just shoot from the hip. That said, since a lot of them are taking the week off for the holidays, I'm listening to CBS-affiliated "Until Saturday" and after they wax poetic about Ohio State, one guy asks "Has Oregon even played a marquee game since the last time these teams met? *dismissively* I guess the Big Ten championship game."
Moving to the Big Ten hasn't fixed our media bias problem.
Moving to the Big Ten hasn't fixed our media bias problem.
-
squintsdd
- Senior
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
Plus another win at Michigan.StevensTechU wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2024 1:33 pm I'll start by saying I think all college podcasts save for 2 ("The Solid Verbal" and "Ari and Andy", with the former being the best by a wide margin) are garbage. Like commentators, it's clear how many don't do any homework at all and just shoot from the hip. That said, since a lot of them are taking the week off for the holidays, I'm listening to CBS-affiliated "Until Saturday" and after they wax poetic about Ohio State, one guy asks "Has Oregon even played a marquee game since the last time these teams met? *dismissively* I guess the Big Ten championship game."
Moving to the Big Ten hasn't fixed our media bias problem.
Oregon likely won't be taken seriously for a while. They're not a traditional blue blood, and come from the Pac12, which was viewed as a week conference. Anyone not named USC from that conference is immediately dismissed.
-
rsbgduck
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Roseburg, OR
- Contact:
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
I don’t mind being the underdog. As for all the ESPN asshats… screw them. I hope the Ducks come out like this is a business trip. To many teams have come out overhyped up and have been out of position, over pursued which resulted in miss tackles, personal fouls, unnecessary roughness penalties extending drives or killing them.
As for bias goes from announcers the CO and BYU game put it on full display.
Officiating has been atrocious this bowl season when it comes to being consistent with calls particularly with defensive PI.
As for bias goes from announcers the CO and BYU game put it on full display.
Officiating has been atrocious this bowl season when it comes to being consistent with calls particularly with defensive PI.
-
5$
- Freshman
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 pm
- Location: Eugene
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
The ohio st fans are disrespectful af, and they're dumb as hell so there's a lot of bad logic and cherry-picked points being made. Just more tacklin' fuel


-
droop10
- Freshman
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Biased logic discounting Oregon
I know you guys will hate to hear this, but outside of Ohio St. and Penn St., the B1G really wasn't that good. There's a reason that an average Indiana team was able to go 11-1. It's a very top heavy conference, as it has been for years. There just aren't many playmakers in the conference, so if a team can get a multi-score lead, the game is basically over. Over the next couple of years, Michigan will definitely join the upper echelon again as hard as they're going with NIL now, and USC may at least be decent. But, it's going to be a lot of blowouts for the Ducks, as it was this year, mixed in with a couple of close games. There's a reason that Ohio St. and Michigan were rarely challenged in the past 5-6 years.
That's not discounting how good the Ducks are, just stating that they really haven't been challenged much in conference, outside of a couple of games. I was at the Wisconsin game, so I know all about the struggles there, but under normal circumstances, that should have been a blow out too. I think that was just a byproduct of night game on the road with 8 consecutive games with some critical injuries mixed in, and a decent amount of recent travel. Wisconsin was not a particularly good team.
That's not discounting how good the Ducks are, just stating that they really haven't been challenged much in conference, outside of a couple of games. I was at the Wisconsin game, so I know all about the struggles there, but under normal circumstances, that should have been a blow out too. I think that was just a byproduct of night game on the road with 8 consecutive games with some critical injuries mixed in, and a decent amount of recent travel. Wisconsin was not a particularly good team.