NBA/Blazers 2025-26 Thread

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 4838
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: NBA/Blazers 2025-26 Thread

Post by Phalanx »

Boom wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 12:17 am
Phalanx wrote: Fri Jun 26, 2026 10:49 pm On another note, what does everyone think about the rumors that the Blazers are pursuing Jaylen Brown?
It makes sense that they're pursing him. Adding an All NBA player with 3 years on his contract would be a coup for this team. They've already missed their chance on building this team through the draft and with the lottery reform making the Bucks picks less valuable... Flipping them to pair a win now player with Deni would be ideal. If they can't add a major piece then the Blazers likely regress in Western standings and also risk landing in the regulation zone.
The Bucks picks are less valuable in terms of certainty, but still have a strong chance to be the same value if the balls fall right. I still believe the Blazers' best shot at becoming a contender is via the draft; they just need to wait a few years for those picks to arrive, and hire someone who can actually identify talent in the meantime. Brown is a good player, but not as good as he thinks he is, and he is starting to get long in the tooth. I'd rather try to draft a guy like Brown and get that level of talent for a whole career instead of the end of it. They will have several shots at it if they can wait a couple of seasons.
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 6191
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: NBA/Blazers 2025-26 Thread

Post by pezsez1 »

On another note, what does everyone think about the rumors that the Blazers are pursuing Jaylen Brown?
Love it, hope they land him. Agree that we kind of frittered away a true draft rebuild (for a "win now" window, anyway), so they've got to make trades if they want to improve. The Blazers have a lot of young talent but it's flawed enough that we should be able to trade several pieces and not lose sleep. They've got to do something, though. The status quo won't cut it.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4636
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: NBA/Blazers 2025-26 Thread

Post by SuperDuck »

pezsez1 wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 1:17 pm
On another note, what does everyone think about the rumors that the Blazers are pursuing Jaylen Brown?
Love it, hope they land him. Agree that we kind of frittered away a true draft rebuild (for a "win now" window, anyway), so they've got to make trades if they want to improve. The Blazers have a lot of young talent but it's flawed enough that we should be able to trade several pieces and not lose sleep. They've got to do something, though. The status quo won't cut it.
I'm wondering how effective Dame Lillard is going to be once he returns. That may have an impact on their next move.
John 3:36
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2048
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: NBA/Blazers 2025-26 Thread

Post by squintsdd »

SuperDuck wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 4:49 pm
pezsez1 wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 1:17 pm
On another note, what does everyone think about the rumors that the Blazers are pursuing Jaylen Brown?
Love it, hope they land him. Agree that we kind of frittered away a true draft rebuild (for a "win now" window, anyway), so they've got to make trades if they want to improve. The Blazers have a lot of young talent but it's flawed enough that we should be able to trade several pieces and not lose sleep. They've got to do something, though. The status quo won't cut it.
I'm wondering how effective Dame Lillard is going to be once he returns. That may have an impact on their next move.
History has shown the players coming back from an achilles tear aren't nearly as effective as preinjury.
User avatar
pudgejeff
All Pac-12
Posts: 5012
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: NBA/Blazers 2025-26 Thread

Post by pudgejeff »

squintsdd wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 8:06 pm
SuperDuck wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 4:49 pm
pezsez1 wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 1:17 pm
On another note, what does everyone think about the rumors that the Blazers are pursuing Jaylen Brown?
Love it, hope they land him. Agree that we kind of frittered away a true draft rebuild (for a "win now" window, anyway), so they've got to make trades if they want to improve. The Blazers have a lot of young talent but it's flawed enough that we should be able to trade several pieces and not lose sleep. They've got to do something, though. The status quo won't cut it.
I'm wondering how effective Dame Lillard is going to be once he returns. That may have an impact on their next move.
History has shown the players coming back from an achilles tear aren't nearly as effective as preinjury.
Also, it’s not usually until the 2 years later until they get to their new “best”. So next year shouldn’t expect a lot. It’s way I hated the contract structure.
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2048
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: NBA/Blazers 2025-26 Thread

Post by squintsdd »

pudgejeff wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 8:50 pm
squintsdd wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 8:06 pm
SuperDuck wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 4:49 pm
pezsez1 wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 1:17 pm
On another note, what does everyone think about the rumors that the Blazers are pursuing Jaylen Brown?
Love it, hope they land him. Agree that we kind of frittered away a true draft rebuild (for a "win now" window, anyway), so they've got to make trades if they want to improve. The Blazers have a lot of young talent but it's flawed enough that we should be able to trade several pieces and not lose sleep. They've got to do something, though. The status quo won't cut it.
I'm wondering how effective Dame Lillard is going to be once he returns. That may have an impact on their next move.
History has shown the players coming back from an achilles tear aren't nearly as effective as preinjury.
Also, it’s not usually until the 2 years later until they get to their new “best”. So next year shouldn’t expect a lot. It’s way I hated the contract structure.
I was on the fence, still am honestly. If he can make an adjustment to not being the primary ball handler i think he'll do okay, but if the offense is expected to run through him, it could be problematic. Also, his defense was already atrocious, it's only going to be worse now.
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 6191
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: NBA/Blazers 2025-26 Thread

Post by pezsez1 »

The offense will run through Deni next season just as it did this past year. He's our prime all-star. I imagine we'll see Jru and Toumani getting lots of open 3s as defenses key in on Deni driving and kicking out to Dame. I do think Dame will still bring it up the floor when not in transition, but he doesn't need to be the #1 option anymore.

That's going to be even more the case if we get Jalen Brown.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
User avatar
pudgejeff
All Pac-12
Posts: 5012
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: NBA/Blazers 2025-26 Thread

Post by pudgejeff »

squintsdd wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 12:54 pm
pudgejeff wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 8:50 pm
squintsdd wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 8:06 pm
SuperDuck wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 4:49 pm
pezsez1 wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 1:17 pm
On another note, what does everyone think about the rumors that the Blazers are pursuing Jaylen Brown?
Love it, hope they land him. Agree that we kind of frittered away a true draft rebuild (for a "win now" window, anyway), so they've got to make trades if they want to improve. The Blazers have a lot of young talent but it's flawed enough that we should be able to trade several pieces and not lose sleep. They've got to do something, though. The status quo won't cut it.
I'm wondering how effective Dame Lillard is going to be once he returns. That may have an impact on their next move.
History has shown the players coming back from an achilles tear aren't nearly as effective as preinjury.
Also, it’s not usually until the 2 years later until they get to their new “best”. So next year shouldn’t expect a lot. It’s way I hated the contract structure.
I was on the fence, still am honestly. If he can make an adjustment to not being the primary ball handler i think he'll do okay, but if the offense is expected to run through him, it could be problematic. Also, his defense was already atrocious, it's only going to be worse now.
It's just more about you pay him 1 year to rehab, 1 year to be at 60-70% so in my opinion year 3 should be the reward you get for fronting the bill on the first 2, instead he gets a player option for year 3? Feels like an awful decision to me.
Post Reply