Huff is a duck!

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

duckgrad99
All Pac-12
Posts: 6086
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by duckgrad99 »

Yeah, I don't think taking 3 running backs makes much sense, especially since James is here for another 3 plus Barner. Anyway, maybe one of the mods can get confirmation on Huff.
Image
sx1080
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 481
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:56 am

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by sx1080 »

karlhungis wrote:
bellsduck wrote:?
Rather save the scholarship for next year on a DL.
Our DL recruiting woes have nothing to do with a limited number of scholarships. It would suck to pass up on a guy with Grants speed in the hopes that every good DL doesn't flip us the bird next year.

and where is Grant going to pay with Lache, Huff , Dontae in the same class.


Grant already committed twice and reneged doubt the coaches even call him back
fecta23
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 347
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:05 pm

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by fecta23 »

sx1080 wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
bellsduck wrote:?
Rather save the scholarship for next year on a DL.
Our DL recruiting woes have nothing to do with a limited number of scholarships. It would suck to pass up on a guy with Grants speed in the hopes that every good DL doesn't flip us the bird next year.

and where is Grant going to pay with Lache, Huff , Dontae in the same class.


Grant already committed twice and reneged doubt the coaches even call him back
If Lache were to for some reason not choose Oregon, I bet they would. But thats just my opinion.
Destroyer77
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:49 pm

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by Destroyer77 »

Huff and Grant would play our slot/hybrid TZR position, Lache and Dontae would be stricly RB's. That's 2 RB's and 2 TZR recruits.
DarronThomas5
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 889
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by DarronThomas5 »

Destroyer77 wrote:Huff and Grant would play our slot/hybrid TZR position, Lache and Dontae would be stricly RB's. That's 2 RB's and 2 TZR recruits.
so where does James and Barner who both have 3 full years of eligibilty left fit in?? there's one ball to go around with limited reps considering we have the lowest T.O.P. in the nation 3 years running.
Image
fecta23
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 347
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:05 pm

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by fecta23 »

DarronThomas1 wrote:
Destroyer77 wrote:Huff and Grant would play our slot/hybrid TZR position, Lache and Dontae would be stricly RB's. That's 2 RB's and 2 TZR recruits.
so where does James and Barner who both have 3 full years of eligibilty left fit in?? there's one ball to go around with limited reps considering we have the lowest T.O.P. in the nation 3 years running.

Maybe, depending on the performance of the new guys in camp, put Barner back at CB. Apparently he played really well there and with not a lot depth next year( aside from the true freshman) maybe it would be best?
Bigducker
Freshman
Posts: 1391
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by Bigducker »

I say no way Ck would take Grant now after two decommits.
Kelly would possible only take Grant if we had no RB's committed and even then I doubt it. You don't want to mess with him like that. I have a feeling that's what happened to King, Chip just got fed up with the game playing. He's pretty much no nonsense.
Destroyer77
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:49 pm

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by Destroyer77 »

DarronThomas1 wrote:
Destroyer77 wrote:Huff and Grant would play our slot/hybrid TZR position, Lache and Dontae would be stricly RB's. That's 2 RB's and 2 TZR recruits.
so where does James and Barner who both have 3 full years of eligibilty left fit in?? there's one ball to go around with limited reps considering we have the lowest T.O.P. in the nation 3 years running.
You're talking about 1 RB and 1 RB/TZR. Here's how I see this (not in order of depth):

RB: James, Williams, Seastrunk, Alston.
TZR: Barner, Huff, Grant

I would say we need no less than 5 active RB's for depth reasons.

Oh, and Lowe is a WR right? I don't see why we shouldn't overbook at these positions if we have great kids that want to sign this year.
Last edited by Destroyer77 on Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
TriDuck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:12 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by TriDuck »

Crenshaw graduated. But don't forget about Lowe!
Image

Oregon: The "Real" number 1 team
duckfbfan15
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 203
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:52 pm
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by duckfbfan15 »

Only Crenshaw won't be back, He was a sr this year!
Image

GO HARD, GO OREGON, GO DUCKS!
User avatar
OreDucks01284
Senior
Posts: 3635
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: Salem, Oregon

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by OreDucks01284 »

if we get Grant back, i hope alston or who else in RB depth chart decide to transfer.
Image
bellsduck
Senior
Posts: 3857
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
GM: Utah Jazz

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by bellsduck »

Destroyer77 wrote:
DarronThomas1 wrote:
Destroyer77 wrote:Huff and Grant would play our slot/hybrid TZR position, Lache and Dontae would be stricly RB's. That's 2 RB's and 2 TZR recruits.
so where does James and Barner who both have 3 full years of eligibilty left fit in?? there's one ball to go around with limited reps considering we have the lowest T.O.P. in the nation 3 years running.
You're talking about 1 RB and 1 RB/TZR. Here's how I see this (not in order of depth):

RB: James, Williams, Seastrunk, Alston.
TZR: Barner, Huff, Grant

I would say we need no less than 5 active RB's for depth reasons.

Oh, and Lowe is a WR right? I don't see why we shouldn't overbook at these positions if we have great kids that want to sign this year.
Thought I had read Lowe would be considered at a TZR position. Even if Barner moved to CB it seems like a lot of guys all within one year of each other at these positions. CB might have more competition than RB with Harris taking one spot already. Just because we can sign 25 doesn't mean we should. Isn't there a limit of 85 total? It's not like I'm totally against taking Grant. Just seems that we are going to need that schollie next year as much or more and I wouldn't do it.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40703
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by UOducksTK1 »

duckgrad99 wrote:Yeah, I don't think taking 3 running backs makes much sense, especially since James is here for another 3 plus Barner. Anyway, maybe one of the mods can get confirmation on Huff.
If Grant wants to greyshirt, I say sign him up for sure. Otherwise, Dontae, Lache, and Grant wouldn't make much sense..

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
goducks75
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Tigard/Eugene

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by goducks75 »

sx1080 wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
bellsduck wrote:?
Rather save the scholarship for next year on a DL.
Our DL recruiting woes have nothing to do with a limited number of scholarships. It would suck to pass up on a guy with Grants speed in the hopes that every good DL doesn't flip us the bird next year.

and where is Grant going to pay with Lache, Huff , Dontae in the same class.


Grant already committed twice and reneged doubt the coaches even call him back
People were saying the same about Diante last year and everyone sure welcomed him with open arms.
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8800
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Huff is a duck!

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

Finally some good news! I had to just get off the computer for awhile. Every time I looked there was more bad news.
Image
Post Reply