Huff is a duck!
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
-
duckgrad99
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6086
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
- Location: San Diego
Re: Huff is a duck!
Yeah, I don't think taking 3 running backs makes much sense, especially since James is here for another 3 plus Barner. Anyway, maybe one of the mods can get confirmation on Huff.

-
sx1080
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:56 am
Re: Huff is a duck!
karlhungis wrote:Our DL recruiting woes have nothing to do with a limited number of scholarships. It would suck to pass up on a guy with Grants speed in the hopes that every good DL doesn't flip us the bird next year.bellsduck wrote:?
Rather save the scholarship for next year on a DL.
and where is Grant going to pay with Lache, Huff , Dontae in the same class.
Grant already committed twice and reneged doubt the coaches even call him back
-
fecta23
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:05 pm
Re: Huff is a duck!
If Lache were to for some reason not choose Oregon, I bet they would. But thats just my opinion.sx1080 wrote:karlhungis wrote:Our DL recruiting woes have nothing to do with a limited number of scholarships. It would suck to pass up on a guy with Grants speed in the hopes that every good DL doesn't flip us the bird next year.bellsduck wrote:?
Rather save the scholarship for next year on a DL.
and where is Grant going to pay with Lache, Huff , Dontae in the same class.
Grant already committed twice and reneged doubt the coaches even call him back
-
Destroyer77
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:49 pm
Re: Huff is a duck!
Huff and Grant would play our slot/hybrid TZR position, Lache and Dontae would be stricly RB's. That's 2 RB's and 2 TZR recruits.
-
DarronThomas5
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 889
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm
Re: Huff is a duck!
so where does James and Barner who both have 3 full years of eligibilty left fit in?? there's one ball to go around with limited reps considering we have the lowest T.O.P. in the nation 3 years running.Destroyer77 wrote:Huff and Grant would play our slot/hybrid TZR position, Lache and Dontae would be stricly RB's. That's 2 RB's and 2 TZR recruits.

-
fecta23
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:05 pm
Re: Huff is a duck!
DarronThomas1 wrote:so where does James and Barner who both have 3 full years of eligibilty left fit in?? there's one ball to go around with limited reps considering we have the lowest T.O.P. in the nation 3 years running.Destroyer77 wrote:Huff and Grant would play our slot/hybrid TZR position, Lache and Dontae would be stricly RB's. That's 2 RB's and 2 TZR recruits.
Maybe, depending on the performance of the new guys in camp, put Barner back at CB. Apparently he played really well there and with not a lot depth next year( aside from the true freshman) maybe it would be best?
-
Bigducker
- Freshman
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm
Re: Huff is a duck!
I say no way Ck would take Grant now after two decommits.
Kelly would possible only take Grant if we had no RB's committed and even then I doubt it. You don't want to mess with him like that. I have a feeling that's what happened to King, Chip just got fed up with the game playing. He's pretty much no nonsense.
Kelly would possible only take Grant if we had no RB's committed and even then I doubt it. You don't want to mess with him like that. I have a feeling that's what happened to King, Chip just got fed up with the game playing. He's pretty much no nonsense.
-
Destroyer77
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:49 pm
Re: Huff is a duck!
You're talking about 1 RB and 1 RB/TZR. Here's how I see this (not in order of depth):DarronThomas1 wrote:so where does James and Barner who both have 3 full years of eligibilty left fit in?? there's one ball to go around with limited reps considering we have the lowest T.O.P. in the nation 3 years running.Destroyer77 wrote:Huff and Grant would play our slot/hybrid TZR position, Lache and Dontae would be stricly RB's. That's 2 RB's and 2 TZR recruits.
RB: James, Williams, Seastrunk, Alston.
TZR: Barner, Huff, Grant
I would say we need no less than 5 active RB's for depth reasons.
Oh, and Lowe is a WR right? I don't see why we shouldn't overbook at these positions if we have great kids that want to sign this year.
Last edited by Destroyer77 on Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- TriDuck
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:12 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Huff is a duck!
Crenshaw graduated. But don't forget about Lowe!
Oregon: The "Real" number 1 team
-
duckfbfan15
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:52 pm
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Re: Huff is a duck!
Only Crenshaw won't be back, He was a sr this year!

GO HARD, GO OREGON, GO DUCKS!
- OreDucks01284
- Senior
- Posts: 3635
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:29 pm
- Location: Salem, Oregon
Re: Huff is a duck!
if we get Grant back, i hope alston or who else in RB depth chart decide to transfer.

-
bellsduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3857
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
- GM: Utah Jazz
Re: Huff is a duck!
Thought I had read Lowe would be considered at a TZR position. Even if Barner moved to CB it seems like a lot of guys all within one year of each other at these positions. CB might have more competition than RB with Harris taking one spot already. Just because we can sign 25 doesn't mean we should. Isn't there a limit of 85 total? It's not like I'm totally against taking Grant. Just seems that we are going to need that schollie next year as much or more and I wouldn't do it.Destroyer77 wrote:You're talking about 1 RB and 1 RB/TZR. Here's how I see this (not in order of depth):DarronThomas1 wrote:so where does James and Barner who both have 3 full years of eligibilty left fit in?? there's one ball to go around with limited reps considering we have the lowest T.O.P. in the nation 3 years running.Destroyer77 wrote:Huff and Grant would play our slot/hybrid TZR position, Lache and Dontae would be stricly RB's. That's 2 RB's and 2 TZR recruits.
RB: James, Williams, Seastrunk, Alston.
TZR: Barner, Huff, Grant
I would say we need no less than 5 active RB's for depth reasons.
Oh, and Lowe is a WR right? I don't see why we shouldn't overbook at these positions if we have great kids that want to sign this year.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40703
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Huff is a duck!
If Grant wants to greyshirt, I say sign him up for sure. Otherwise, Dontae, Lache, and Grant wouldn't make much sense..duckgrad99 wrote:Yeah, I don't think taking 3 running backs makes much sense, especially since James is here for another 3 plus Barner. Anyway, maybe one of the mods can get confirmation on Huff.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
-
goducks75
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:54 pm
- Location: Tigard/Eugene
Re: Huff is a duck!
People were saying the same about Diante last year and everyone sure welcomed him with open arms.sx1080 wrote:karlhungis wrote:Our DL recruiting woes have nothing to do with a limited number of scholarships. It would suck to pass up on a guy with Grants speed in the hopes that every good DL doesn't flip us the bird next year.bellsduck wrote:?
Rather save the scholarship for next year on a DL.
and where is Grant going to pay with Lache, Huff , Dontae in the same class.
Grant already committed twice and reneged doubt the coaches even call him back
-
dthomas=ddixon
- Moderator

- Posts: 8800
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
- Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Re: Huff is a duck!
Finally some good news! I had to just get off the computer for awhile. Every time I looked there was more bad news.
