Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Anything that wont fit in any of the other forums

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 38935
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by greenyellow »

big z wrote:
Biggus Duckus wrote:I like the Texas and Oklahoma schools. As for the 6th school, I would be okay with Colorado, Utah or TCU. I doubt any of those except Colorado would happen though.

(I told myself I didn't want any religious schools, but then I thought about Texas CHRISTIAN and how I wanted them in. Plus, have you seen their cheerleaders?)
Yes I have!
Image
Can we just start inviting schools based on how hot their cheerleaders are? ;)
Image
oregontrack
All Pac-12
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by oregontrack »

I was shocked when I heard Baylor floated around instead of CU. CU provides the Denver market, which is quite sizeable. Everything about CU makes more sense than Baylor, but whatever. I agree with the "whatever helps bring Texas to the Pac" post.
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
wheaton4prez
Senior
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by wheaton4prez »

The arguments put forward for Baylor over Colorado have merit, imo. They look to have better over-all athletics and are comparable academically.

What is the reason for objecting to Baylor on religious grounds?
Mukden
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:55 pm

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by Mukden »

Here is my view (take it or leave it):

Religious schools already know the answers to the questions they are asking. If you think the world is 6000 yrs old, I don’t know how you can claim to have an anthropology department.

Their self stated primary goal is often something OTHER than education (propagation and defense of a certain creed, for example).

They rarely perform much research, and often have no desire to.
User avatar
justducky0
Senior
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: The Real World

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by justducky0 »

I am sensing some deep seeded subconscious hate for religious based schools in the forum haha
Image
Mukden
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:55 pm

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by Mukden »

I don’t HATE religious schools; I just don’t really see the point. It hampers the academic mission of the school, and if you can’t represent your faith in an environment where others may question it, do you really have any faith?

Most of my experience is with BYU. I can tell that getting an education is NOT the reason people go there.
User avatar
wheaton4prez
Senior
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by wheaton4prez »

Mukden wrote:Religious schools already know the answers to the questions they are asking. If you think the world is 6000 yrs old, I don’t know how you can claim to have an anthropology department.
I think that the idea that religious people think that they know the answers to all questions is bunk. I suspect that you if you spent a little more time considering it, you would agree.
Mukden wrote:Their self stated primary goal is often something OTHER than education (propagation and defense of a certain creed, for example).
The mission of Baylor University is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and Christian commitment within a caring community.
http://www.baylor.edu/about/index.php?id=48040
Mukden wrote:They rarely perform much research, and often have no desire to.
Although the University was founded as a teaching institution, research has long been an important part of its academic life. The University is also working to strengthen the current research environment as part of Baylor 2012. To that end, in 2004 the University dedicated a new 500,000-square-foot (46,000 m2) science complex which facilitates research on a variety of subjects.
In 2005, the University was invited to join the Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF) collaboration at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois. The project is one of the world's largest experimental physics collaborations.
In 2006, the Carnegie Foundation upgraded the university's classification to "Research University" status with "High Research Activity," opening the door to many new research opportunities.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baylor_Uni ... _endowment
Last edited by wheaton4prez on Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
wheaton4prez
Senior
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by wheaton4prez »

Mukden wrote:It hampers the academic mission of the school, and if you can’t represent your faith in an environment where others may question it, do you really have any faith?
How does being religious hamper education?

How does an institution supporting a religion demonstrate a lack of faith?
Mukden wrote:I can tell that getting an education is NOT the reason people go there.
Do you think that people going to BYU would agree with your assessment of them, if given the opportunity to respond?
User avatar
wheaton4prez
Senior
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by wheaton4prez »

Biggus Duckus wrote:I know this is not directed at me, but no, I don't think people go to BYU to get an education.
Somehow, they seem to be getting one. BYU is ranked higher than both Baylor and Colorado (and Oregon for that matter): http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandrevie ... t/byu-3670
Mukden
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:55 pm

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by Mukden »

I think that the idea that religious people think that they know the answers to all questions is bunk. I suspect that you if you spent a little more time considering it, you would agree.
How is it bunk? If I firmly believe the world is only 6000 years old, how can seriously study, well, anything really?

I know Baylor does research (and is something of an exception in this regard), but being Baptist has never helped them on this front.

-Baylor College of Medicine separated from the University due to is religious affiliation.

-Baylor College of Dentistry cut ties with the school, for the same reason.

-Baylor Law generally likes to keep its distance from the religiously influenced undergraduate portion of the school.

-Their federal and state funding is severely limited; because of this, they do comparatively little research when you take their Billion+ endowment into consideration.

-The Baylor 2012 plan mentioned in one of you’re quotes has been a massive controversy at the school.

Baylor is trapped in an endless identity crisis, which would end the moment they became non-sectarian. How is it productive to spend time and energy arguing over whether students should be allowed to dance or not? How am I supposed to take a school where dancing is a controversy seriously? Keep in mind this is the same place a Basketball coach covered up the murder of one of his players. See the misplaced priorities? Dare I say the hypocrisy?
How does being religious hamper education?
Does Baylor being a hot-bed of “Intelligent Design Theory” A.K.A “science gave me the wrong answer so I’ll dress religion up in the trappings of science and hope no one can tell the difference” help answer that question?

FARMS at BYU is another example.
Do you think that people going to BYU would agree with your assessment of them, if given the opportunity to respond?
Yes, I think they would. They go there to be in an environment supportive of their values, and to find a spouse. The education is secondary. Many LDS people never even consider attending another school.

How does an institution supporting a religion demonstrate a lack of faith?
Why should a university have to babysit you, and make you live your faith? If you don't believe in pre-maritial sex, thats totally fine with me, totally respectable, and even a little noble. But shouldn't you just not have sex, rather than need the Baylor RA's to come peek around your room a 2 in the morning?
User avatar
wheaton4prez
Senior
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by wheaton4prez »

Mukden wrote:How is it bunk? If I firmly believe the world is only 6000 years old, how can seriously study, well, anything really?
Not all religions believe that the world is 6000 years old.

Even if they did, not all areas of study involve the age of the world in any way.

Therefore, your statement is bunk.
Mukden wrote:I know Baylor does research (and is something of an exception in this regard), but being Baptist has never helped them on this front.
It doesn't appear to have hurt them either. As noted in my link their status as a "Research University" was recently upgraded.
Mukden wrote:-Baylor College of Medicine separated from the University due to is religious affiliation.

-Baylor College of Dentistry cut ties with the school, for the same reason.

-Baylor Law generally likes to keep its distance from the religiously influenced undergraduate portion of the school.

-Their federal and state funding is severely limited; because of this, they do comparatively little research when you take their Billion+ endowment into consideration.

-The Baylor 2012 plan mentioned in one of you’re quotes has been a massive controversy at the school.
How does any of this come into play in regard to being part of an athletic conference?
Mukden wrote:Baylor is trapped in an endless identity crisis, which would end the moment they became non-sectarian. How is it productive to spend time and energy arguing over whether students should be allowed to dance or not? How am I supposed to take a school where dancing is a controversy seriously? Keep in mind this is the same place a Basketball coach covered up the murder of one of his players. See the misplaced priorities? Dare I say the hypocrisy?
No. What I see are fantastic leaps in logic. That a coach covered up a murder says nothing about the priorities of the college. That dancing has been debated there or anywhere else says nothing about whether or not the college provides a quality education or should be taken seriously.

Based on widely regarded rankings, they are taken more seriously than most colleges in the nation, including Oregon.
Mukden wrote:Does Baylor being a hot-bed of “Intelligent Design Theory” A.K.A “science gave me the wrong answer so I’ll dress religion up in the trappings of science and hope no one can tell the difference” help answer that question?
No. It doesn't at all. A persons position on intelligent design has little to do with many (if not most) of what they study in college. Also, that some people debate that issue there is not an indication that it's on the agenda of everyone on campus.
Mukden wrote:Yes, I think they would. They go there to be in an environment supportive of their values, and to find a spouse. The education is secondary. Many LDS people never even consider attending another school.
They don't need a school to "be in an environment supportive of their values, and to find a spouse." That doesn't seem to be anything unique to BYU anyway. People often choose schools that support their values, are familiar, they like, or are close to home. A lot of people marry someone they meet in college as well.

Not considering another school doesn't mean that they aren't going to a school for the school part.
Mukden wrote:Why should a university have to babysit you, and make you live your faith? If you don't believe in pre-maritial sex, thats totally fine with me, totally respectable, and even a little noble. But shouldn't you just not have sex, rather than need the Baylor RA's to come peek around your room a 2 in the morning?
To each their own. Students voluntarily go to the school. Perhaps they want to be in an environment where a specific standard of behavior is enforced. It says nothing about their faith or the quality of education they are getting.
big z
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 11:22 am
Location: West Point City, Utah
Contact:

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by big z »

greenyellow wrote:
big z wrote:
Biggus Duckus wrote:I like the Texas and Oklahoma schools. As for the 6th school, I would be okay with Colorado, Utah or TCU. I doubt any of those except Colorado would happen though.

(I told myself I didn't want any religious schools, but then I thought about Texas CHRISTIAN and how I wanted them in. Plus, have you seen their cheerleaders?)
Yes I have!
Image
Can we just start inviting schools based on how hot their cheerleaders are? ;)
We get them and their knee high boots every other year in SLC.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10984
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by buckmarkduck »

Wow, thanks Mukden, for coming on here and totally ruining this thread. I love it when supposed "open minded" people show how intolerant they really are to other beliefs. Now if C4Q can manage to find a few more just like you we can change the name to educk, and have no real sports talk just have every thread ruined by stupid politics and religion. I pretty sure 99% of us come to talk sports, and we would rather leave all religion and politics out of it. I think I speak for the majority here when I say STFU and if you don't have anything to add to the topic at hand don't post.
oregontrack
All Pac-12
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by oregontrack »

Mukden wrote:Here is my view (take it or leave it):

Religious schools already know the answers to the questions they are asking. If you think the world is 6000 yrs old, I don’t know how you can claim to have an anthropology department.

Their self stated primary goal is often something OTHER than education (propagation and defense of a certain creed, for example).

They rarely perform much research, and often have no desire to.
haha

I'm not going to jump into the middle of this, but I've often wondered this very thing. Spot on, spot on.
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 38935
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?

Post by greenyellow »

big z wrote:
greenyellow wrote:
big z wrote:
Biggus Duckus wrote:I like the Texas and Oklahoma schools. As for the 6th school, I would be okay with Colorado, Utah or TCU. I doubt any of those except Colorado would happen though.

(I told myself I didn't want any religious schools, but then I thought about Texas CHRISTIAN and how I wanted them in. Plus, have you seen their cheerleaders?)
Yes I have!
Image
Can we just start inviting schools based on how hot their cheerleaders are? ;)
We get them and their knee high boots every other year in SLC.
They easily outclassed Boise State's cheerleaders in the Fiesta Bowl this year.
Image
Post Reply