JC WR visiting Oregon

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:13 am

http://oregon.scout.com/a.z?s=128&p=8&c=1&nid=4918261

Phenom · Post by **Phenom** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:34 am

JC receivers haven't worked out well here. The last one that was OK was Scott. And he was only good for one year...like James Finley.

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:35 am

Phenom wrote:JC receivers haven't worked out well here. The last one that was OK was Scott. And he was only good for one year...like James Finley.

But if there was ever a class that needed a JC WR, this would definitely be the year.

brich75 · Post by **brich75** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:36 am

Phenom wrote:JC receivers haven't worked out well here. The last one that was OK was Scott. And he was only good for one year...like James Finley.

LT seems to be doing ok.

Boom · Post by **Boom** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:54 am

ya, I expect that we will go for at least 1-2 JC receivers this year to shore up our D/C.

Phenom · Post by **Phenom** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:56 am

brich75 wrote:
Phenom wrote:JC receivers haven't worked out well here. The last one that was OK was Scott. And he was only good for one year...like James Finley.
LT seems to be doing ok.

Totally forgot about him, but yeah he's been solid.

duckz · Post by **duckz** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:24 am

His profile also says 3 to play 2. That has to help. Not to mention our recent 4 to play 0 signees.

Post by **greenyellow** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:03 pm

duckz wrote:His profile also says 3 to play 2. That has to help. Not to mention our recent 4 to play 0 signees.

I wouldn't be all too surprised if he's a candidate to RS once he gets here, but only because JC transfers tend to need a year to fully acclimate to the system so that they can be productive.

vagusnerve · Post by **vagusnerve** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:21 pm

well it seems as if Kelly really wants Huff to get some good game experience this year so that he will be a "veteran" next year.

although so far Huff hasn't done much, but what can you expect? he's a true freshman...

what we'll really miss next year is Davis' blocking and Maehl's go-to guy status... a jc might give us the blocking but def not the #1 receiver thing.

TriDuck · Post by **TriDuck** » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:04 pm

This guy appears to have Jamere Holland type measurables...hopefully doesn't come with Jamere Holland type problems as well.

Post by **greenyellow** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:52 am

vagusnerve wrote:well it seems as if Kelly really wants Huff to get some good game experience this year so that he will be a "veteran" next year.

although so far Huff hasn't done much, but what can you expect? he's a true freshman...

what we'll really miss next year is Davis' blocking and Maehl's go-to guy status... a jc might give us the blocking but def not the #1 receiver thing.

Davis brings that extra downfield blocking that we always seem to have with our WRs. He's a good downfield blocker like J-Will and James Finley were.

karlhungis · Post by **karlhungis** » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:03 am

vagusnerve wrote:well it seems as if Kelly really wants Huff to get some good game experience this year so that he will be a "veteran" next year.

although so far Huff hasn't done much, but what can you expect? he's a true freshman...

what we'll really miss next year is Davis' blocking and Maehl's go-to guy status... a jc might give us the blocking but def not the #1 receiver thing.

Huff has looked pretty good if you ask me. I am excited to see him develop.

JC WR visiting Oregon

JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon

Re: JC WR visiting Oregon