Grade the 2010 Class
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
-
Sooth
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:34 am
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
I went with an A. And I'm usually not very easy to please.
Sure we missed on some, but Heimuli made my day.
Sure we missed on some, but Heimuli made my day.
-
SuperDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Contact:
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
Ask me how good this class is in 2-3 years. It looks very good on paper, but there's no way to know, actually there's really no way to even guess based on what they did in high school.
From the looks of it I'd give us a B+/A-, but I'm just a fan with no personal knowledge of the kids and their abilities like the coaches have.
I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this class turns out to be an A+++
From the looks of it I'd give us a B+/A-, but I'm just a fan with no personal knowledge of the kids and their abilities like the coaches have.
I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this class turns out to be an A+++
John 3:36
-
sepdxsnwbrdr
- One Star Recruit
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:38 am
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
cosignednehalem wrote:That's what I thought and how I voted.A-. Totally awesome offensively, awesome secondary, but one more solid DT/DE would have made it an A/A+ for me.
Try to ban me...I steal wifi so I get a new IP each time I log on.
- ksmack
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:40 am
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
A- DT/DE/DL were the holes I would of loved to fill more! however Ducks will be fine ~ GO DUCKS 
Its Otime everytime, Quack loud and Proud!
-
RanDux
- Senior
- Posts: 2840
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
- Location: Happy Valley, OR
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
A from me. Yes, we would have liked anothe DT or two, but I love the speed and quality of the class. The speed of this class is just insane.
- Duckster
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Too close to Corn-valley
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
I gave this class an A...I would have given it an A+ if we would have gotten a few more D-Line players. But I am totally stoked! Go, Ducks!
- featherbutt
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:59 am
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
I gave it a B based on my perception of the other offers.
It is hard to give it a much lower ranking with White, Lache, Heimuli, Dior and Rowland coming. Wow.
However, we just won the conference by 2 full games. We were just in the Rose Bowl. We have the best facilities on planet earth. All this and the only prep D-line help we get is a potential one-and-done Hamani-type guy? Really? Right now we should be swinging our member around and knocking over huge, mean, and smart DT's. Guys that are not going to take a 2-year break right after they are just learning how to play at this level.
Also, look at the other recruits. Sure, there will be a couple that will contribute. Maybe one may become the best player ever at Oregon (cough, cough, Washington). The offer lists from these 3* players is not what I expected. USC gets an A-level class. UCLA, Florida got them too. This is a great class but I really expected more need filling and balance.
Remember all of you rah-rah's, this is just an opinion from one guy. No need to flame
It is hard to give it a much lower ranking with White, Lache, Heimuli, Dior and Rowland coming. Wow.
However, we just won the conference by 2 full games. We were just in the Rose Bowl. We have the best facilities on planet earth. All this and the only prep D-line help we get is a potential one-and-done Hamani-type guy? Really? Right now we should be swinging our member around and knocking over huge, mean, and smart DT's. Guys that are not going to take a 2-year break right after they are just learning how to play at this level.
Also, look at the other recruits. Sure, there will be a couple that will contribute. Maybe one may become the best player ever at Oregon (cough, cough, Washington). The offer lists from these 3* players is not what I expected. USC gets an A-level class. UCLA, Florida got them too. This is a great class but I really expected more need filling and balance.
Remember all of you rah-rah's, this is just an opinion from one guy. No need to flame
-
duckgrad99
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6086
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
- Location: San Diego
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
featherbutt wrote:I gave it a B based on my perception of the other offers.
It is hard to give it a much lower ranking with White, Lache, Heimuli, Dior and Rowland coming. Wow.
However, we just won the conference by 2 full games. We were just in the Rose Bowl. We have the best facilities on planet earth. All this and the only prep D-line help we get is a potential one-and-done Hamani-type guy? Really? Right now we should be swinging our member around and knocking over huge, mean, and smart DT's. Guys that are not going to take a 2-year break right after they are just learning how to play at this level.
Also, look at the other recruits. Sure, there will be a couple that will contribute. Maybe one may become the best player ever at Oregon (cough, cough, Washington). The offer lists from these 3* players is not what I expected. USC gets an A-level class. UCLA, Florida got them too. This is a great class but I really expected more need filling and balance.
Remember all of you rah-rah's, this is just an opinion from one guy. No need to flame
Well we aren't USC or Florida. As far as needs filled, we could have used another DT or two but I think the balance of this class is great.

- featherbutt
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:59 am
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
too many bugs, not enough beef. Review Rose Bowl tape.
-
uostudent
- Senior
- Posts: 3561
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:03 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
A- tremendous class, but need more help at DT. Proud of Chip and the coaching staff.
As academics improve and the team continues with its winning ways, Oregon will have even better recruiting classes.
USC had an excellent class, but they have to be disappointed that they missed out on a bunch of top guys who appeared to be SC locks. The loss of Pete Carroll definitely hurt.
I hate to say it, but the Weasel did an unbelievable job of recruiting this year. UCLA is definitely a program on the rise.
As academics improve and the team continues with its winning ways, Oregon will have even better recruiting classes.
USC had an excellent class, but they have to be disappointed that they missed out on a bunch of top guys who appeared to be SC locks. The loss of Pete Carroll definitely hurt.
I hate to say it, but the Weasel did an unbelievable job of recruiting this year. UCLA is definitely a program on the rise.
“If everybody in this room just want to be real with themselves, this game could have went either way,” he said. “We turned the ball over a lot. We beat ourself. Just be real with yourself right now. We beat ourself.”
-Jameis Winston after Oregon's decisive 59-20 victory over Florida State in the Rose Bowl
-Jameis Winston after Oregon's decisive 59-20 victory over Florida State in the Rose Bowl
-
GoDucksIn09
- Senior
- Posts: 3086
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:15 am
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
I guess I am a troll if vote. I would give it a B simply because while on the skill players we did very well but the lack of DL or DE signees is a pause for concern. We have all heard defense wins championships... We lost the Rose Bowl in large part to our defense not being able to tackle. It is an extreme area of need and yet we really whiffed on most of the DL recruits we targeted and to top that off we lost Owa.. an instate recruit.. lost McCain in the end and lost King. Championship teams when have areas of needs they do everything to get those needs filled. Our offense will instead have to score 50 per game again in order to win. I am sorry if being the realist when it comes to our needs on the DL makes me a troll.
-
uodux1212
- Senior
- Posts: 3965
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:44 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
You cant lose a recruit if he was never really yours to begin with... Owa wants to study engineering... His final three schools OSU, UCLA and UN all have Engineering Programs/Schools... Oregon does not.
Last edited by uodux1212 on Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

"How do we go from nine to one?" - Chip Kelly
“Our expectations are to win every game we play." - CK
- briarduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3183
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
- Location: Milwaukie OR
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
I voted an A- because the one position of greatest need we fell a little short but beyond that I couldn't be happier!
As far a missing on a few guys, that happens every year it just means they focused a little to much and didn't have enough fall backs or the fall backs went somewhere else...
All in all great class!
GO DUCKS!!
As far a missing on a few guys, that happens every year it just means they focused a little to much and didn't have enough fall backs or the fall backs went somewhere else...
All in all great class!
GO DUCKS!!
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
- briarduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3183
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
- Location: Milwaukie OR
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
I agree...we tend to focus on who we didn't get and not on who is actually a Duck!uodux1212 wrote:You cant lose a recruit if he was never really yours to begin with... Owa wants to study engineering... His final three schools OSU, UCLA and UN all have Engineering Programs/Schools... Oregon does not.
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
-
vagusnerve
- Freshman
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:56 pm
Re: Grade the 2010 Class
I gave A-
We did very well at every single area of need, with the exception of DE & DT
Without Heimuli, I would have given a B or even B- ...
I think in order to get an A or A+ class, we needed to book two more standouts at DL, for example, Easley or Owa or King or Werner
I am still really interested to hear more about the King story, btw, but its sounding more and more like Kelly would rather be weak on the Dline than have someone that "didn't fit" in the program. Makes me think that McCain may have had his offer pulled as well???
We did very well at every single area of need, with the exception of DE & DT
Without Heimuli, I would have given a B or even B- ...
I think in order to get an A or A+ class, we needed to book two more standouts at DL, for example, Easley or Owa or King or Werner
I am still really interested to hear more about the King story, btw, but its sounding more and more like Kelly would rather be weak on the Dline than have someone that "didn't fit" in the program. Makes me think that McCain may have had his offer pulled as well???