Grade the 2010 Class

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

How would you rate the 2010 class?

A+
5
3%
A
54
32%
A-
77
46%
B+
24
14%
B
8
5%
B-
0
No votes
C+ or worse
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 168
Sooth
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 593
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:34 am

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by Sooth »

I went with an A. And I'm usually not very easy to please.

Sure we missed on some, but Heimuli made my day.
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4670
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by SuperDuck »

Ask me how good this class is in 2-3 years. It looks very good on paper, but there's no way to know, actually there's really no way to even guess based on what they did in high school.

From the looks of it I'd give us a B+/A-, but I'm just a fan with no personal knowledge of the kids and their abilities like the coaches have.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this class turns out to be an A+++ :D
John 3:36
sepdxsnwbrdr
One Star Recruit
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:38 am

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by sepdxsnwbrdr »

nehalem wrote:
A-. Totally awesome offensively, awesome secondary, but one more solid DT/DE would have made it an A/A+ for me.
That's what I thought and how I voted.
cosigned
Try to ban me...I steal wifi so I get a new IP each time I log on.
User avatar
ksmack
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:40 am

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by ksmack »

A- DT/DE/DL were the holes I would of loved to fill more! however Ducks will be fine ~ GO DUCKS :mrgreen:
Its Otime everytime, Quack loud and Proud!
RanDux
Senior
Posts: 2840
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
Location: Happy Valley, OR

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by RanDux »

A from me. Yes, we would have liked anothe DT or two, but I love the speed and quality of the class. The speed of this class is just insane.
User avatar
Duckster
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:18 pm
Location: Too close to Corn-valley

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by Duckster »

I gave this class an A...I would have given it an A+ if we would have gotten a few more D-Line players. But I am totally stoked! Go, Ducks!
User avatar
featherbutt
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:59 am

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by featherbutt »

I gave it a B based on my perception of the other offers.

It is hard to give it a much lower ranking with White, Lache, Heimuli, Dior and Rowland coming. Wow.

However, we just won the conference by 2 full games. We were just in the Rose Bowl. We have the best facilities on planet earth. All this and the only prep D-line help we get is a potential one-and-done Hamani-type guy? Really? Right now we should be swinging our member around and knocking over huge, mean, and smart DT's. Guys that are not going to take a 2-year break right after they are just learning how to play at this level.

Also, look at the other recruits. Sure, there will be a couple that will contribute. Maybe one may become the best player ever at Oregon (cough, cough, Washington). The offer lists from these 3* players is not what I expected. USC gets an A-level class. UCLA, Florida got them too. This is a great class but I really expected more need filling and balance.

Remember all of you rah-rah's, this is just an opinion from one guy. No need to flame
duckgrad99
All Pac-12
Posts: 6086
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by duckgrad99 »

featherbutt wrote:I gave it a B based on my perception of the other offers.

It is hard to give it a much lower ranking with White, Lache, Heimuli, Dior and Rowland coming. Wow.

However, we just won the conference by 2 full games. We were just in the Rose Bowl. We have the best facilities on planet earth. All this and the only prep D-line help we get is a potential one-and-done Hamani-type guy? Really? Right now we should be swinging our member around and knocking over huge, mean, and smart DT's. Guys that are not going to take a 2-year break right after they are just learning how to play at this level.

Also, look at the other recruits. Sure, there will be a couple that will contribute. Maybe one may become the best player ever at Oregon (cough, cough, Washington). The offer lists from these 3* players is not what I expected. USC gets an A-level class. UCLA, Florida got them too. This is a great class but I really expected more need filling and balance.

Remember all of you rah-rah's, this is just an opinion from one guy. No need to flame

Well we aren't USC or Florida. As far as needs filled, we could have used another DT or two but I think the balance of this class is great.
Image
User avatar
featherbutt
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:59 am

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by featherbutt »

too many bugs, not enough beef. Review Rose Bowl tape.
uostudent
Senior
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:03 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by uostudent »

A- tremendous class, but need more help at DT. Proud of Chip and the coaching staff.

As academics improve and the team continues with its winning ways, Oregon will have even better recruiting classes.

USC had an excellent class, but they have to be disappointed that they missed out on a bunch of top guys who appeared to be SC locks. The loss of Pete Carroll definitely hurt.

I hate to say it, but the Weasel did an unbelievable job of recruiting this year. UCLA is definitely a program on the rise.
“If everybody in this room just want to be real with themselves, this game could have went either way,” he said. “We turned the ball over a lot. We beat ourself. Just be real with yourself right now. We beat ourself.”
-Jameis Winston after Oregon's decisive 59-20 victory over Florida State in the Rose Bowl
GoDucksIn09
Senior
Posts: 3086
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:15 am

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by GoDucksIn09 »

I guess I am a troll if vote. I would give it a B simply because while on the skill players we did very well but the lack of DL or DE signees is a pause for concern. We have all heard defense wins championships... We lost the Rose Bowl in large part to our defense not being able to tackle. It is an extreme area of need and yet we really whiffed on most of the DL recruits we targeted and to top that off we lost Owa.. an instate recruit.. lost McCain in the end and lost King. Championship teams when have areas of needs they do everything to get those needs filled. Our offense will instead have to score 50 per game again in order to win. I am sorry if being the realist when it comes to our needs on the DL makes me a troll.
uodux1212
Senior
Posts: 3965
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:44 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by uodux1212 »

You cant lose a recruit if he was never really yours to begin with... Owa wants to study engineering... His final three schools OSU, UCLA and UN all have Engineering Programs/Schools... Oregon does not.
Last edited by uodux1212 on Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

"How do we go from nine to one?" - Chip Kelly

“Our expectations are to win every game we play." - CK
User avatar
briarduck
Senior
Posts: 3183
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
Location: Milwaukie OR

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by briarduck »

I voted an A- because the one position of greatest need we fell a little short but beyond that I couldn't be happier!

As far a missing on a few guys, that happens every year it just means they focused a little to much and didn't have enough fall backs or the fall backs went somewhere else...

All in all great class!

GO DUCKS!!
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
User avatar
briarduck
Senior
Posts: 3183
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
Location: Milwaukie OR

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by briarduck »

uodux1212 wrote:You cant lose a recruit if he was never really yours to begin with... Owa wants to study engineering... His final three schools OSU, UCLA and UN all have Engineering Programs/Schools... Oregon does not.
I agree...we tend to focus on who we didn't get and not on who is actually a Duck!
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
vagusnerve
Freshman
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by vagusnerve »

I gave A-


We did very well at every single area of need, with the exception of DE & DT

Without Heimuli, I would have given a B or even B- ...


I think in order to get an A or A+ class, we needed to book two more standouts at DL, for example, Easley or Owa or King or Werner


I am still really interested to hear more about the King story, btw, but its sounding more and more like Kelly would rather be weak on the Dline than have someone that "didn't fit" in the program. Makes me think that McCain may have had his offer pulled as well???
Post Reply