Grade the 2010 Class

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

How would you rate the 2010 class?

A+
5
3%
A
54
32%
A-
77
46%
B+
24
14%
B
8
5%
B-
0
No votes
C+ or worse
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 168
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40705
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Grade the 2010 Class

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Vote!

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40705
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by UOducksTK1 »

I gave it an A. This is some of the most talent we've ever had in a single class. And too be honest, for once I am actually very very very happy with out class. My only gripe is I wish we could have snagged another DT or kept Gabe/Owa around, but it's not a big deal. adding Ricky was a big addition to this class late.

I love this class.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
PDXShogun
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 583
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:18 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by PDXShogun »

I voted A- only because we missed on a few targets that we once lead for. Overall though, I couldn't have expected much more. The speed this class has is phenominal.
User avatar
sickaduck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 466
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:10 pm
Location: Medford

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by sickaduck »

I was thinking the exact same thing TK. Major talent, just missed on some more = A for me.
freedjr
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 979
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:23 am

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by freedjr »

A-. Totally awesome offensively, awesome secondary, but one more solid DT/DE would have made it an A/A+ for me.
User avatar
hendrg
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:27 am
Location: Santiago, Chile

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by hendrg »

You guys are tough to please. I gave it an A+ because of adding Heimuli + Huff at the end and confirming Dargan.

Sure one more DT would have been amazing but considering that it's CK's first year and he's already equaled or slightly improved on the Ducks best class ever on paper (2007), it exceeded my expectations.

I guess I grade on a curve :mrgreen:
Last edited by hendrg on Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
goducks75
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Tigard/Eugene

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by goducks75 »

A-. Not as much depth as I would like on the D line but other than that we did damn good. Heimuli did a LOT to help this class out though. Got some project LBs while we have depth there (give them time to learn), lots of depth/talent at DB/RB, a good QB in Bennett, good WRs in Lowe and Huff, etc.
whosyourwally
Freshman
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:52 am
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by whosyourwally »

i think by oregon stadards, this class is an a/a+, as it is one of best ever for uo. however, on a national scale, i'd say it's a b+, as we missed out on some biggies that would have put us over the top.

avg. those out= a-.

however, i think with chip kelly at the helm, an a++++++ coach/oc, and a- talent coming in, the sky is the limit.
chapelhillduck
Senior
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:15 am

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by chapelhillduck »

TK-

if anyone gives this a B- or lower can you ban them immediately?
User avatar
NCDucks09
Senior
Posts: 2265
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:37 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by NCDucks09 »

Hell of a class. Most diverse class we've ever had nationally as well!
2012 Rose Bowl Champions
2013 Fiesta Bowl Champions

Still Dedicated to the Ducks Winning the Natty!
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40705
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by UOducksTK1 »

chapelhillduck wrote:TK-

if anyone gives this a B- or lower can you ban them immediately?
Haha, I want to know who gave it a B?

Troll for sure.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
nehalem
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 774
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:15 pm

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by nehalem »

A-. Totally awesome offensively, awesome secondary, but one more solid DT/DE would have made it an A/A+ for me.
That's what I thought and how I voted.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by greenyellow »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
chapelhillduck wrote:TK-

if anyone gives this a B- or lower can you ban them immediately?
Haha, I want to know who gave it a B?

Troll for sure.
Actually I think I may have been one since I had clicked on B+ and then push on my down arrow key. I thought the page didn't go down because I just wasn't clicked on the window; it may have been I was still in the poll options.
Image
kevinsund1
One Star Recruit
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:31 pm

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by kevinsund1 »

No way this class gets an A without more DT's, unless Heimuli can line up at more than one place at a time. I find it laughable how many people on here both gripe about our lack of ability to land big time d-line recruits, and rate the class as an A+(how does that work). Recruiting is all about fulfilling your needs, did we NEED 3 awesome Running backs? NO!(even though i LOOOOOOVE IT!!!). Dont get me wrong this is a great class for Oregon, but look at Florida before you get mad about people giving this class a B lol.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Grade the 2010 Class

Post by greenyellow »

This class is really a B+ class that had the opportunity to be at least an A- if they had landed a couple more DL. The balance and filling of needs isn't there for this class. Kelly could also sign some DL late and that may bump this class up in my book. Until that happens, this class is a B+.
Image
Post Reply