More proof the NCAA is corrupt

OregonFan4Life · Post by **OregonFan4Life** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:35 pm

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2011 ... _majo.html

So pathetic if true. And the SEC and NCAA love affair continues.

Post by **Bud Lee** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:39 pm

OregonFan4Life wrote:http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2011 ... _majo.html

So pathetic if true. And the SEC and NCAA love affair continues.

sigh...why do we even bother having The Other Guys Board.

Quack_12 · Post by **Quack_12** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:40 pm

I Seen that coming Bud.

OregonFan4Life · Post by **OregonFan4Life** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:41 pm

Bud Lee wrote:
OregonFan4Life wrote:http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2011 ... _majo.html

So pathetic if true. And the SEC and NCAA love affair continues.

sigh...why do we even bother having The Other Guys Board.

Why do you even bother coming to an Oregon Ducks board?

Post by **Bud Lee** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:46 pm

OregonFan4Life wrote:
Bud Lee wrote:
OregonFan4Life wrote:http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2011 ... _majo.html

So pathetic if true. And the SEC and NCAA love affair continues.

sigh...why do we even bother having The Other Guys Board.

Why do you even bother coming to an Oregon Ducks board?

Someone has to keep the “Regular Season Hot Chick” thread going….oh…and I want to win the pick’em contest.

At the rate it took to announce last year winner of that thing…you will be stuck with me until this time next year…and then by then I would of started playing 2012’s…and so on.

MerDuck · Post by **MerDuck** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:31 pm

OregonFan4Life wrote: Why do you even bother coming to an Oregon Ducks board?

Bud Lee wrote:Someone has to keep the “Regular Season Hot Chick” thread going….oh…and I want to win the pick’em contest.

Very True!

Bud Lee wrote:At the rate it took to announce last year winner of that thing…you will be stuck with me until this time next year…and then by then I would of started playing 2012’s…and so on.

Also Very True! LOL

duck55 · Post by **duck55** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:31 pm

Bud Lee wrote:
OregonFan4Life wrote:
Bud Lee wrote:
OregonFan4Life wrote:http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2011 ... _majo.html

So pathetic if true. And the SEC and NCAA love affair continues.

sigh...why do we even bother having The Other Guys Board.

Why do you even bother coming to an Oregon Ducks board?
Someone has to keep the “Regular Season Hot Chick” thread going….oh…and I want to win the pick’em contest.

At the rate it took to announce last year winner of that thing…you will be stuck with me until this time next year…and then by then I would of started playing 2012’s…and so on.

Now Bud, the Regular Season Hot Chick thread belongs in the other board doesn't it???
You have proven to not be a band wagon fan around here.

Post by **Bud Lee** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:40 am

Now Bud, the Regular Season Hot Chick thread belongs in the other board doesn't it???

I actually gave that a lot of thought…I look at board placement in the same manner as I look at venues for a case, sometimes you have multiple venues that are appropriate and you simply have to chose the best one. My logic on placing it here is that it is the “regular season hot chick thread” the Duck’s participates in the “regular season” and the girls in the thread are not limited to girls that reside in the borders of the SEC jurisdiction, therefore opening it up to girls that reside within Duck territory, thus venue can be appropriate in “Kelly’s Heroes.” It is also an important to note that the “Off-Season hot chick thread was here.” Since it was it sets a precedent that all such threads should be placed here.

But yes....generally speaking, Boobie threads should be posted in the "Other Board"

You have proven to not be a band wagon fan around here

.

Thanks

Penky26 · Post by **Penky26** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:40 am

You win on the hot chick thread, although the pushback is certainly not going to be there either way. Carry on Bud.

QuackininBama · Post by **QuackininBama** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:11 am

Even Bud knows Auburn and Cam "got over" on EVERYONE. Anyone who doesn't think Auburn paid for his services is just deluding themselves. He was bought and paid for.

Post by **Bud Lee** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:44 am

QuackininBama wrote:Even Bud knows Auburn and Cam "got over" on EVERYONE. Anyone who doesn't think Auburn paid for his services is just deluding themselves. He was bought and paid for.

I’m a lawyer dude…I don’t “know” anything unless there is evidence to prove it. All we have is speculation, until a “bagman” is named or unexplained money surfaces….he is clean-ish in my book, and trust me it is not any SEC brotherly love that keeps makes me say that. I have a deep hatred for that program (no offence AU fans) and I would love to be able to point at them and say “ha ha!”…but after 13 months of looking with no results, either they are not guilty of wrong doing when it comes to Cam, or they need to hold a seminar to teach schools like Ohio and Miami how to do it right.

AU4UO · Post by **AU4UO** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:06 pm

Even after 13 months of investigation and over 80 interviews with no major(or secondary) violations found, Auburn is still guilty in the court of public opinion. I'd say I was surprised, but I'd be lying.

Post by **Bud Lee** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:39 pm

Auburn is still guilty in the court of public opinion

Most biased, unreasonable, logic free court there is.

AU4UO · Post by **AU4UO** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:02 pm

Bud Lee wrote:
Auburn is still guilty in the court of public opinion
Most biased, unreasonable, logic free court there is.

wheaton4prez · Post by **wheaton4prez** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:08 pm

It's plausible to me that Auburn, the program, is not guilty of any wrong-doing.

But, it's not plausible to me that Cam's dad shopped him without Cam's knowledge. Even if he didn't know, that it happened without repercussions is a blight on football. The honorable course of action there is to take responsibility for it, apologize, step down, etc. Not wipe the brow and laugh about a close call.

"Good thing that we didn't lose millions of NFL money due to our attempt to cheat!"

More proof the NCAA is corrupt

More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt

Re: More proof the NCAA is corrupt