Seahawks
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:02 pm
Looks like the Seahawks might have a QB controversy. Russell Wilson lit it up tonight.
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
... what. no one said he's the next john elway, i'm just saying there's no controversy. he will start the 2012 for the seattle seahawks. to go with flynn at this point would undermine everything pete carroll has preached since coming to the pacific northwest.Duck24 wrote:It's the pre-season, don't get too excited. Ryan Leaf looked great in his first pre-season games. Not saying he didn't look impressive, but do it against first stringers all season long.
i'm not sure that's true. i saw berry and routt.USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.
Sent from my iPad
Brandon flowers and Kendrick Lewis were out with injuries.oregontrack wrote:i'm not sure that's true. i saw berry and routt.USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.
Sent from my iPad
lol how did TO do? I watched at bww but really only paid attention to turbin. So glad they have TVs at the urinal or I'd miss his tdoregontrack wrote:ah. i knew i hadn't seen flowers, but the way you wrote that made it seem like kansas city played backups at all four spots back there.
oh well, we played TO. that's probably a wash.
USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.
Sent from my iPad
essentially useless. by the same logic that pete carroll needs to start wilson to justify his competition-is-everything mantra, TO really shouldn't make the 53 man roster. a 1-2-3 of sydney rice, braylon edwards, and doug baldwin will do just fine. especially with tight ends like miller and winslow around.USUaggieDuck wrote:lol how did TO do? I watched at bww but really only paid attention to turbin. So glad they have TVs at the urinal or I'd miss his tdoregontrack wrote:ah. i knew i hadn't seen flowers, but the way you wrote that made it seem like kansas city played backups at all four spots back there.
oh well, we played TO. that's probably a wash.
Sent from my iPad
Did you not read where i say the two who didn't start? Would our defense be as good if we left in one starter?buckmarkduck wrote:USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.
Sent from my iPad
So Eric Berry doesn start for KC now?
USUaggieDuck wrote:Did you not read where i say the two who didn't start? Would our defense be as good if we left in one starter?buckmarkduck wrote:USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.
Sent from my iPad
So Eric Berry doesn start for KC now?
Posted from my Android
sorry, thought you were being sarcastic. Berry played, and this is what happenedbuckmarkduck wrote:USUaggieDuck wrote:Did you not read where i say the two who didn't start? Would our defense be as good if we left in one starter?buckmarkduck wrote:USUaggieDuck wrote:Kc sat their starting DBs. But I'm all Wilson.
Sent from my iPad
So Eric Berry doesn start for KC now?
Posted from my Android
No I didn't, that's why I asked. I know Berry was out all year wasn't sure if he was 100% back as a starter or not yet.