Colorado

gofightingducks · Post by **gofightingducks** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:57 pm

Sucks!

buckmarkduck · Post by **buckmarkduck** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:00 pm

gofightingducks wrote:Sucks!

They are only down 35-0 in the first vs Fresno. That's not bad is it?

mrpd21 · Post by **mrpd21** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:04 pm

gofightingducks wrote:Sucks!

LOL!! I got on to the computer to type this exact thing, title and quote and all. What a joke they are, yikes!

gofightingducks · Post by **gofightingducks** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:05 pm

mrpd21 wrote:
gofightingducks wrote:Sucks!

LOL!! I got on to the computer to type this exact thing, title and quote and all. What a joke they are, yikes!

They are an embarrassment to the conference

Phalanx · Post by **Phalanx** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:08 pm

Fresno is actually looking pretty good this year. With our weak schedule, it might end up being a feather in our cap that we beat the best team in the Mountain West, if the Bulldogs can pull it off.

cordy02c · Post by **cordy02c** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:31 pm

We get them weel before Sc thank goodness for that

RanDux · Post by **RanDux** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:04 pm

55-7 at halftime.

Duck07 · Post by **Duck07** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:11 pm

I don't know if Embree can keep his job at the end of this year. They have shown zero improvement since he took over.

maxduck · Post by **maxduck** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:17 pm

Colorado has 10 penalties in just the first half.

Duck07 · Post by **Duck07** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:28 pm

69-7 midway through the 4th.

I'm not going to bother even trying to comprehend what the transitive property score would be between us if we left our starters in for 3 quarters.

Post by **greenyellow** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:33 pm

Duck07 wrote:69-7 midway through the 4th.

I'm not going to bother even trying to comprehend what the transitive property score would be between us if we left our starters in for 3 quarters.

With the game being in Autzen this year, it could get very ugly although Chip will probably throttle it down pretty early.

uostudent · Post by **uostudent** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:04 pm

They don't belong in the Pac 12

uodux1212 · Post by **uodux1212** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:37 pm

uostudent wrote:They don't belong in the Pac 12

X 1000

duck55 · Post by **duck55** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:53 pm

uostudent wrote:They don't belong in the Pac 12

Are they really that much worse than the O-fer Puppies? Now, just a few short years later, those same dawgs are getting into scraps with the likes of LSU and think they are back.
The buffs, like the dawgs can claim a national title.

buckmarkduck · Post by **buckmarkduck** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:59 pm

duck55 wrote:
uostudent wrote:They don't belong in the Pac 12
Are they really that much worse than the O-fer Puppies? Now, just a few short years later, those same dawgs are getting into scraps with the likes of LSU and think they are back.
The buffs, like the dawgs can claim a national title.

They are wayyyy worse then the 0-12 team. That team lost, but they where in a few games, but always found a way to lose. CU may not even be in any games. They could honestly go down as the worst team to ever play in the PAC or PCC or whatever other conference name we have had over time.

Colorado

Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado

Re: Colorado