Page 1 of 2

Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:57 pm
by gofightingducks
Sucks!

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:00 pm
by buckmarkduck
gofightingducks wrote:Sucks!

They are only down 35-0 in the first vs Fresno. That's not bad is it? :lol:

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:04 pm
by mrpd21
gofightingducks wrote:Sucks!

LOL!! I got on to the computer to type this exact thing, title and quote and all. What a joke they are, yikes!

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:05 pm
by gofightingducks
mrpd21 wrote:
gofightingducks wrote:Sucks!

LOL!! I got on to the computer to type this exact thing, title and quote and all. What a joke they are, yikes!

They are an embarrassment to the conference :?

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:08 pm
by Phalanx
Fresno is actually looking pretty good this year. With our weak schedule, it might end up being a feather in our cap that we beat the best team in the Mountain West, if the Bulldogs can pull it off.

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:31 pm
by cordy02c
We get them weel before Sc thank goodness for that

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:04 pm
by RanDux
55-7 at halftime.

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:11 pm
by Duck07
I don't know if Embree can keep his job at the end of this year. They have shown zero improvement since he took over.

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:17 pm
by maxduck
Colorado has 10 penalties in just the first half.

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:28 pm
by Duck07
69-7 midway through the 4th.

I'm not going to bother even trying to comprehend what the transitive property score would be between us if we left our starters in for 3 quarters.

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:33 pm
by greenyellow
Duck07 wrote:69-7 midway through the 4th.

I'm not going to bother even trying to comprehend what the transitive property score would be between us if we left our starters in for 3 quarters.
With the game being in Autzen this year, it could get very ugly although Chip will probably throttle it down pretty early.

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:04 pm
by uostudent
They don't belong in the Pac 12 :(

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:37 pm
by uodux1212
uostudent wrote:They don't belong in the Pac 12 :(

X 1000

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:53 pm
by duck55
uostudent wrote:They don't belong in the Pac 12 :(
Are they really that much worse than the O-fer Puppies? Now, just a few short years later, those same dawgs are getting into scraps with the likes of LSU and think they are back.
The buffs, like the dawgs can claim a national title.

Re: Colorado

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:59 pm
by buckmarkduck
duck55 wrote:
uostudent wrote:They don't belong in the Pac 12 :(
Are they really that much worse than the O-fer Puppies? Now, just a few short years later, those same dawgs are getting into scraps with the likes of LSU and think they are back.
The buffs, like the dawgs can claim a national title.

They are wayyyy worse then the 0-12 team. That team lost, but they where in a few games, but always found a way to lose. CU may not even be in any games. They could honestly go down as the worst team to ever play in the PAC or PCC or whatever other conference name we have had over time.