Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

quackattack
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:36 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by quackattack »

Image
User avatar
bigsugarduck
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:52 pm

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by bigsugarduck »

I hope this is that one little thing that we need to be good again..........a PG..... :roll:
Stewart Mandel-"From a purely aesthetic standpoint, I much prefer to watch a good spread-rushing offense over a traditional Power-I offense, and Oregon's has been the most fun by far for the past several years. It's fast, its precise, and when Chip Kelly has the right quarterback (Dixon, Masoli) at the helm, the possibility of someone ripping off a 60-yard run exists on nearly every play."
User avatar
echo31
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1009
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:02 am
Location: Portland

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by echo31 »

Thank Goodness, because without him, we were going to have to move a shooting guard over to point.
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39154
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by greenyellow »

echo31 wrote:Thank Goodness, because without him, we were going to have to move a shooting guard over to point.
I though we already had with Porter and Sim playing PG.
Image
duckgrad99
All Pac-12
Posts: 6086
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by duckgrad99 »

He could be a good piece, but whether or not he is starting material remains to be seen. I mean is he really better than Kamyron Brown? I think Wilson will have a much bigger impact.
Image
quackattack
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:36 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by quackattack »

duckgrad99 wrote:He could be a good piece, but whether or not he is starting material remains to be seen. I mean is he really better than Kamyron Brown? I think Wilson will have a much bigger impact.
i think Armstead could = Kamyron + outside shot + fewer turnovers, but that's just my guess. he was the top JC PG after only 1 year.

my ideal lineup & rotation would look like this now:

starters:
Armstead
Porter
Humphrey
Wilson
Dunigan

off the bench:
Sim
Longmire
Wiley
Catron
Crittle

redshirt two of these if possible:
Teondre
Singler
Jacob
Image
User avatar
justducky0
Senior
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: The Real World

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by justducky0 »

dude I like your starters and bench, the only change would be Sim and Armstead starting instead of him and Porter, Porter needs to come off the bench in short bursts. I do not think porter is a full game time player, more of a special shooter type not an all around point guard
Image
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by Boom »

duckgrad99 wrote:He could be a good piece, but whether or not he is starting material remains to be seen. I mean is he really better than Kamyron Brown? I think Wilson will have a much bigger impact.
completely agree with this.

IMO this kid is way over hyped.
northbeachsf
Freshman
Posts: 1494
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:54 pm

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by northbeachsf »

I would go with:
Armstead
Humphrey
Longmire
Catron / Wilson
Dunigan

Porter - 6th man
Other Guards off bench - Sim then Wiley
Bigs off bench - Crittle, Catron or Wilson, then Jacob

Redshirt - Williams and Singler


Justification:
You almost have to start Armstead, as he is the only true PG on the roster. Sim doesn't have the ballhandling skills or the speed to push and Porter lacks size and the ability to find open teammates. Both very decent SGs in Oregon's offense IMHO and I am happy to see them in Oregon uniforms. I just don't like guys being forced to play out of position. Brandon Lincoln was another decent player that was a victim of being forced to play the PG position for a few seasons (much like Porter and Sim last season). Dunigan is the clear starter at Center. Catron probably starts at one of the forward positions because of experience, but is taken over by Wilson mid-way through the season. Humphrey really started to play better the last few games of the season. He looks to me like the best option at SG. I like Longmire's length, athletic ability, and slashing style. I am predicting a huge jump in his game this season. I think Porter is clearly the 6th man and should be used in a James Davis type roll. He could be a huge spark coming off the bench for this team
User avatar
Tray Dub
Senior
Posts: 4994
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by Tray Dub »

quackattack wrote:
duckgrad99 wrote:He could be a good piece, but whether or not he is starting material remains to be seen. I mean is he really better than Kamyron Brown? I think Wilson will have a much bigger impact.
i think Armstead could = Kamyron + outside shot + fewer turnovers, but that's just my guess. he was the top JC PG after only 1 year.

my ideal lineup & rotation would look like this now:

starters:
Armstead
Porter
Humphrey
Wilson
Dunigan

off the bench:
Sim
Longmire
Wiley
Catron
Crittle

redshirt two of these if possible:
Teondre
Singler
Jacob
Switch LL with Humphrey for me and you've got my starters. I think only two of those three will likely redshirt, though I'm not sure which two. Otherwise, good lineup.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40506
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by UOducksTK1 »

greenyellow wrote:
echo31 wrote:Thank Goodness, because without him, we were going to have to move a shooting guard over to point.
I though we already had with Porter and Sim playing PG.
Both are clearly SGs in a PG body. You can't run either at point and be successful.

Sim has potential, maybe down the road, to play PG. But he's not ready right now.

Armstead should be the starter @ PG next season unless he totally flops.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8577
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

Ok correct me if I'm wrong but where is this kid listed as the top JC PG? Isn't he "the most sought after" at this point because most other PGs have already signed with a team? This whole "top PG" thing seems like a big load of BS.
Image
TheJuice
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:39 am

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by TheJuice »

dthomas=ddixon wrote:Ok correct me if I'm wrong but where is this kid listed as the top JC PG? Isn't he "the most sought after" at this point because most other PGs have already signed with a team? This whole "top PG" thing seems like a big load of BS.

You're wrong.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by Boom »

TheJuice wrote:
dthomas=ddixon wrote:Ok correct me if I'm wrong but where is this kid listed as the top JC PG? Isn't he "the most sought after" at this point because most other PGs have already signed with a team? This whole "top PG" thing seems like a big load of BS.

You're wrong.
How about you add something to the discussion and explain why he is wrong?
User avatar
Howry
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:37 pm

Re: Malcolm Armstead Signs LOI

Post by Howry »

Having Porter and Armstead in the backcourt together kind of scares me for defensive purposes. That leaves us a TINY backcourt. Although we did it with Brooks and Porter so hopefully it can work out. We really need someone to step up as a scorer next season on the outside(Humphrey?) and one of the big guys to be a 13/7 guy to take the pressure off Porter. If he is our #1 option again we arent going to do well. He is at best a #2 scorer but his size limits him from being the go to go. Which we saw last year.
Post Reply