Byers to Clemson
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
-
SteelTown43
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:17 am
- fpsduck
- Senior
- Posts: 2862
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Byers to Clemson
F*cking Clemson.
- dd10snoop28
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5046
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
-
SuperDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Contact:
Re: Byers to Clemson
This sucks, but it doesn't really shock me too much. I had a feeling Clemson would swoop in at the last minute. We'll be alright.
John 3:36
-
chapelhillduck
- Senior
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:15 am
Re: Byers to Clemson
Please people...don't be like the USC boards here with the recommit
-
karlhungis
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7990
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am
Re: Byers to Clemson
Damn, he sounded pretty solid last week. Freakin Dabo, can't stand that guy.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
-
Sooth
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:34 am
Re: Byers to Clemson
not too surprising but still really stings. i think this guy could have had a real impact on the d-line.
- PDXShogun
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:18 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Byers to Clemson
Clemson = The nation's most consistent underachiever. Still, can't blame the kid too much for staying close to home.
- nehalem
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:15 pm
Re: Byers to Clemson
I'm starting to think we should recruit sumo wrestlers for the DT position. Leverage, excellent footwork, agility, strength are all there. I dont know how fast they'd be, but the rest of the skill set seems like it would lend itself to being a good DT or DE. And salt is cheap.
-
bellsduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3857
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
- GM: Utah Jazz
Re: Byers to Clemson
Chip Kelly will probably never attend an announcement again.
- briarduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3183
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
- Location: Milwaukie OR
Re: Byers to Clemson
Isn't that the truth...I thought thius guy was solid with us, CRAP!bellsduck wrote:Chip Kelly will probably never attend an announcement again.
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
- nehalem
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:15 pm
Re: Byers to Clemson
So are we now in the market for a Bluto Blutarsky from Faber type of DT?
- pezsez1
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6451
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
- Location: RIP CITY
Re: Byers to Clemson
I understand this is a big decision for these kids to make, but come on! This isn’t like the Black Mamba, who committed to USC several months ago and has had lots of time to really think things over. Byers held a press conference just a few days ago and committed himself to Oregon… and then he changed his mind? I’m sorry, but I’ll never be OK with that.
I understand Clemson was his dream school. But if he really wanted to go to Clemson, why did he commit to Oregon at all? Why not just wait until signing day and then commit to a school, without making one school falsely plan on having him?
How much longer are we going to keep using the word “committed” when describing recruits before LOI day?
I understand Clemson was his dream school. But if he really wanted to go to Clemson, why did he commit to Oregon at all? Why not just wait until signing day and then commit to a school, without making one school falsely plan on having him?
How much longer are we going to keep using the word “committed” when describing recruits before LOI day?
Willie Taggart is a dick.
- UofO8
- Senior
- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:41 pm
Re: Byers to Clemson
Hahaha i will never understand Clemson. Always mediocre, yet pulls top recruits.

- uo2010
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA (via Portland)
Re: Byers to Clemson
He wanted to reserve a spot in this class in case things filled up and he didnt get an offer from Clemson. I would have done the same thing.pezsez1 wrote:I understand this is a big decision for these kids to make, but come on! This isn’t like the Black Mamba, who committed to USC several months ago and has had lots of time to really think things over. Byers held a press conference just a few days ago and committed himself to Oregon… and then he changed his mind? I’m sorry, but I’ll never be OK with that.
I understand Clemson was his dream school. But if he really wanted to go to Clemson, why did he commit to Oregon at all? Why not just wait until signing day and then commit to a school, without making one school falsely plan on having him?
How much longer are we going to keep using the word “committed” when describing recruits before LOI day?
