Byers to Clemson

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

SteelTown43
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 184
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:17 am

Byers to Clemson

Post by SteelTown43 »

User avatar
fpsduck
Senior
Posts: 2862
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:10 am

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by fpsduck »

F*cking Clemson.
User avatar
dd10snoop28
All Pac-12
Posts: 5046
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by dd10snoop28 »

ugh. Tough loss.

Now we really need Simmons/Heyward.
Image
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4670
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by SuperDuck »

This sucks, but it doesn't really shock me too much. I had a feeling Clemson would swoop in at the last minute. We'll be alright.
John 3:36
chapelhillduck
Senior
Posts: 2408
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:15 am

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by chapelhillduck »

Please people...don't be like the USC boards here with the recommit
karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7990
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by karlhungis »

Damn, he sounded pretty solid last week. Freakin Dabo, can't stand that guy.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
Sooth
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 593
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:34 am

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by Sooth »

not too surprising but still really stings. i think this guy could have had a real impact on the d-line.
User avatar
PDXShogun
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 583
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:18 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by PDXShogun »

Clemson = The nation's most consistent underachiever. Still, can't blame the kid too much for staying close to home.
User avatar
nehalem
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 774
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:15 pm

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by nehalem »

I'm starting to think we should recruit sumo wrestlers for the DT position. Leverage, excellent footwork, agility, strength are all there. I dont know how fast they'd be, but the rest of the skill set seems like it would lend itself to being a good DT or DE. And salt is cheap.
bellsduck
Senior
Posts: 3857
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
GM: Utah Jazz

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by bellsduck »

Chip Kelly will probably never attend an announcement again.
User avatar
briarduck
Senior
Posts: 3183
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
Location: Milwaukie OR

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by briarduck »

bellsduck wrote:Chip Kelly will probably never attend an announcement again.
Isn't that the truth...I thought thius guy was solid with us, CRAP!
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
User avatar
nehalem
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 774
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:15 pm

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by nehalem »

So are we now in the market for a Bluto Blutarsky from Faber type of DT?
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 6450
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by pezsez1 »

I understand this is a big decision for these kids to make, but come on! This isn’t like the Black Mamba, who committed to USC several months ago and has had lots of time to really think things over. Byers held a press conference just a few days ago and committed himself to Oregon… and then he changed his mind? I’m sorry, but I’ll never be OK with that.
I understand Clemson was his dream school. But if he really wanted to go to Clemson, why did he commit to Oregon at all? Why not just wait until signing day and then commit to a school, without making one school falsely plan on having him?
How much longer are we going to keep using the word “committed” when describing recruits before LOI day?
Willie Taggart is a dick.
User avatar
UofO8
Senior
Posts: 2538
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:41 pm

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by UofO8 »

Hahaha i will never understand Clemson. Always mediocre, yet pulls top recruits.
Image
User avatar
uo2010
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 579
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:00 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA (via Portland)

Re: Byers to Clemson

Post by uo2010 »

pezsez1 wrote:I understand this is a big decision for these kids to make, but come on! This isn’t like the Black Mamba, who committed to USC several months ago and has had lots of time to really think things over. Byers held a press conference just a few days ago and committed himself to Oregon… and then he changed his mind? I’m sorry, but I’ll never be OK with that.
I understand Clemson was his dream school. But if he really wanted to go to Clemson, why did he commit to Oregon at all? Why not just wait until signing day and then commit to a school, without making one school falsely plan on having him?
How much longer are we going to keep using the word “committed” when describing recruits before LOI day?
He wanted to reserve a spot in this class in case things filled up and he didnt get an offer from Clemson. I would have done the same thing.
Post Reply