So, about the 2012 Class

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
Zyme
All Pac-12
Posts: 5582
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
GM: New York Knicks GM

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by Zyme »

TB drafts him to pair up Blount and LMJ
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94

K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
User avatar
stlDUCKfan
Pac-12 Prediction Winner!
Posts: 966
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:54 pm
Location: STL

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by stlDUCKfan »

Zyme wrote:TB drafts him to pair up Blount and LMJ
Being from STL and a Rams fan I would love to see LMJ in the backfield with S. Jackson to get some lighting to go with the thunder. I don't think Jackson is an every down back. Crazy to see a Beaver and a Duck in the same backfield.
Image
User avatar
Juice
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 685
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:19 am
Location: Seattle

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by Juice »

headshottzzzz wrote:
PDXShogun wrote:LaMichael is a given. We're lucky he even came back this year.

Cliff is a real possibility. Needs to get bigger and be more consistent but he's in line for a great year.

Boyett is doubtful. Nice college player but 5'10 safeties without elite speed are a dime a dozen in the NFL.

Thomas also doubtful. Spread option quarterbacks are always a huge ? in the draft and he doesn't seem to have the elite tools that pro scouts look for.


Of course you can never tell who gets in a guys ear and tells him he's the greatest thing or if they are in a situation where they need to start to provide for their family, but I'd be shocked if Boyett and Thomas weren't around for their senior years.
LMJ isn't a given. He really doesn't have the size to project to be anything more than a rotational back. He'll be the most talented rotational guy in the NFL, but he won't be purely a franchise player. He'll be favored to come out, but don't discount what the NFL naysayers will be telling him.

DT will come back, I think. Unless something crazy happens, he's more of a college player than an NFL prospect.

Boyett could go. He's super talented, plus he has the Oregon DB pedigree to boost his status.

Paulson is a guy who could leave. He's super talented, will be eligible to go pro next year, and could be a 2nd or 3rd round prospect, which is really good for a TE.

Barner is another guy who could go, especially if LMJ wants to stay.

Jackson Rice could go. He's talented enough (and has an ego big enough FWIW) for him to want to go pro.

If Dion Jordan has a breakout (by breakout I mean Fairley-esque dominant) year, then he could go pro as well.

Not all of these guys will go. Most will stay, but there are some definite leave early candidates in this year's underclassmen crop.
Paulson will be a senior.

and I don't think I've ever heard of a punter entering the draft early, lol.
User avatar
Zyme
All Pac-12
Posts: 5582
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
GM: New York Knicks GM

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by Zyme »

swagnatic101 wrote:
headshottzzzz wrote:
PDXShogun wrote:LaMichael is a given. We're lucky he even came back this year.

Cliff is a real possibility. Needs to get bigger and be more consistent but he's in line for a great year.

Boyett is doubtful. Nice college player but 5'10 safeties without elite speed are a dime a dozen in the NFL.

Thomas also doubtful. Spread option quarterbacks are always a huge ? in the draft and he doesn't seem to have the elite tools that pro scouts look for.


Of course you can never tell who gets in a guys ear and tells him he's the greatest thing or if they are in a situation where they need to start to provide for their family, but I'd be shocked if Boyett and Thomas weren't around for their senior years.
LMJ isn't a given. He really doesn't have the size to project to be anything more than a rotational back. He'll be the most talented rotational guy in the NFL, but he won't be purely a franchise player. He'll be favored to come out, but don't discount what the NFL naysayers will be telling him.

DT will come back, I think. Unless something crazy happens, he's more of a college player than an NFL prospect.

Boyett could go. He's super talented, plus he has the Oregon DB pedigree to boost his status.

Paulson is a guy who could leave. He's super talented, will be eligible to go pro next year, and could be a 2nd or 3rd round prospect, which is really good for a TE.

Barner is another guy who could go, especially if LMJ wants to stay.

Jackson Rice could go. He's talented enough (and has an ego big enough FWIW) for him to want to go pro.

If Dion Jordan has a breakout (by breakout I mean Fairley-esque dominant) year, then he could go pro as well.

Not all of these guys will go. Most will stay, but there are some definite leave early candidates in this year's underclassmen crop.
Paulson will be a senior.

and I don't think I've ever heard of a punter entering the draft early, lol.
My gut reaction:
LMJ gone
Barner Stay
Thomas Stay
Rice Stay
Jordan Stay
Cliff gone
Boyett Stay
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94

K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
AugustDuck
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 432
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:57 am

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by AugustDuck »

headshottzzzz wrote:
PDXShogun wrote:LaMichael is a given. We're lucky he even came back this year.

Cliff is a real possibility. Needs to get bigger and be more consistent but he's in line for a great year.

Boyett is doubtful. Nice college player but 5'10 safeties without elite speed are a dime a dozen in the NFL.

Thomas also doubtful. Spread option quarterbacks are always a huge ? in the draft and he doesn't seem to have the elite tools that pro scouts look for.


Of course you can never tell who gets in a guys ear and tells him he's the greatest thing or if they are in a situation where they need to start to provide for their family, but I'd be shocked if Boyett and Thomas weren't around for their senior years.
LMJ isn't a given. He really doesn't have the size to project to be anything more than a rotational back. He'll be the most talented rotational guy in the NFL, but he won't be purely a franchise player. He'll be favored to come out, but don't discount what the NFL naysayers will be telling him.

DT will come back, I think. Unless something crazy happens, he's more of a college player than an NFL prospect.

Boyett could go. He's super talented, plus he has the Oregon DB pedigree to boost his status.

Paulson is a guy who could leave. He's super talented, will be eligible to go pro next year, and could be a 2nd or 3rd round prospect, which is really good for a TE.

Barner is another guy who could go, especially if LMJ wants to stay.

Jackson Rice could go. He's talented enough (and has an ego big enough FWIW) for him to want to go pro.

If Dion Jordan has a breakout (by breakout I mean Fairley-esque dominant) year, then he could go pro as well.

Not all of these guys will go. Most will stay, but there are some definite leave early candidates in this year's underclassmen crop.
Paulson will be a senior next year.
vagusnerve
Freshman
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by vagusnerve »

i think buckmark's estimate of 22 schollies next year is too optimistic.

with 12 guys graduating, + LMJ leaving, + 2 discretionary schollies (beard too) + a couple other guys leaving for whatever reason (it always happens), we'll be at 17ish. i don't see how you get to 22 from there without a bunch of attrition
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5815
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by Boom »

PDXShogun wrote:LaMichael is a given. We're lucky he even came back this year.

Cliff is a real possibility. Needs to get bigger and be more consistent but he's in line for a great year.

Boyett is doubtful. Nice college player but 5'10 safeties without elite speed are a dime a dozen in the NFL.

Thomas also doubtful. Spread option quarterbacks are always a huge ? in the draft and he doesn't seem to have the elite tools that pro scouts look for.


Of course you can never tell who gets in a guys ear and tells him he's the greatest thing or if they are in a situation where they need to start to provide for their family, but I'd be shocked if Boyett and Thomas weren't around for their senior years.
You just described TJ Ward and he was a 2nd round pick :lol:

Boyett basically stole his starting spot from him during his senior.
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9914
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by Phenom »

Not really. TJ is a lot bigger, better and harder tackler, and he tested surprisingly well in coverage drills.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11017
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by buckmarkduck »

Cliff at 160-170 won't be drafted higher than 4th round, why would he leave? He needs to live in the weight room over the next 2 years and get up to at least 185 to be a first round pick. At his size right now NFL WR's would eat him alive. Could you imagine him lined up against Andre Johnson, Megatron or even Wes Welker. It would be ugly.
Last edited by buckmarkduck on Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5815
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by Boom »

Phenom wrote:Not really. TJ is a lot bigger, better and harder tackler, and he tested surprisingly well in coverage drills.
TJ weighed in at 211lbs the combine. Boyett is listed at 198lbs.

So I wouldn't say he's a lot bigger... Boyett could easily put some weight on before next season.

And I don't think TJ was the better player.

Boyett forced the coaches to put him on the field with his play...even after TJ got back from his ankle injury.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5815
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by Boom »

buckmarkduck wrote:Cliff at 160-170 won't be drafted higher than 4th round, why would he leave? He needs to live in the weight room over the next 2 years and get up to at least 185 to be a first round pick.
Cliff's listed at 180 on goducks.... pretty sure they use actual numbers?
User avatar
TheMaehlMan
Junior
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 4:21 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by TheMaehlMan »

buckmarkduck wrote:Cliff at 160-170 won't be drafted higher than 4th round, why would he leave? He needs to live in the weight room over the next 2 years and get up to at least 185 to be a first round pick. At his size right now NFL WR's would eat him alive. Could you imagine him lined up against Andre Johnson, Megatron or even Wes Welker. It would be ugly.
If Darius Butler(I know random, you'd have to be a Pat fan to get it) can be drafted in the second round, then Cliff Harris sure can. It's hard to find corners with Cliff's ball-skills, he's at least going in the second round, proly 1st round.
Image

Going to miss the Maehl Man
User avatar
UofO8
Senior
Posts: 2538
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:41 pm

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by UofO8 »

Phenom wrote:Not really. TJ is a lot bigger, better and harder tackler, and he tested surprisingly well in coverage drills.
Bigger? Yes, maybe a bit. But better? Nah, not really.
Image
GoDucksIn09
Senior
Posts: 3086
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:15 am

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by GoDucksIn09 »

I dont know any names.. but as usual one area we have to do a whole lot of work on landing is on our D line both at end.. and at tackle. It has been one area we have struggled with for awhile and hopefully we can finally get some top notch guys coming to Oregon. Then I would move to the O line as we need to continue building that as will lost one or 2 OL next year. The last area could use a little work on would be Defensive back.. assuming that after next year Cliff Harris leaves. I think he will. While I think we need to go after a qb or two i do not think Thomas will leave after next year.

On a side note.. for the whole class I think we need to keep setting the bar higher.. instead of a top 10 class.. lets go for a top 5 class. That means going after the best talents.
rjfrik
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:26 am

Re: So, about the 2012 Class

Post by rjfrik »

buckmarkduck wrote:Cliff at 160-170 won't be drafted higher than 4th round, why would he leave? He needs to live in the weight room over the next 2 years and get up to at least 185 to be a first round pick. At his size right now NFL WR's would eat him alive. Could you imagine him lined up against Andre Johnson, Megatron or even Wes Welker. It would be ugly.


I hate to say it but Megatron and A.J. would dominate him. Cliff needs two more years to put on 20-25 pounds
Post Reply