Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
Merganzer
Senior
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:42 am

Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by Merganzer »

User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by StevensTechU »

Despite the injury to Nyara? If Sedona Prince doesn't get a transfer waiver, I don't know that #1 is warranted.
Greenblood
Senior
Posts: 3465
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:16 pm

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by Greenblood »

While I by no means fancy myself a women's college basketball expert, with four returning starters (three of whom are perhaps AA quality), three returning reserves, three international recruits + Moore on their roster, I can't say I'm surprised the Ducks are #1. I even wonder, as good as she hopefully will prove to be at some point, just how much the presence of Nyara -- still yet to play college ball -- would even figure into such preseason predictions.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by StevensTechU »

Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
Thurston
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:49 pm

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by Thurston »

Who else would it be? Baylor is #2, and we lost a super close F4 game to them and they lost Kalani Brown to graduation. We're as good a bet as #1 as anyone else.
duck58
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:56 pm

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by duck58 »

Thurston wrote:Who else would it be? Baylor is #2, and we lost a super close F4 game to them and they lost Kalani Brown to graduation. We're as good a bet as #1 as anyone else.
Exactly.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by StevensTechU »

Totally get that. Such is the difference between rankings and predicting who will actually win it all.

I hope it's as simple as Prince is deemed eligible.
User avatar
bigsugarduck
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:52 pm

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by bigsugarduck »

StevensTechU wrote:Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
Wrong.

Depth was the downfall. Yes, of course a few more bigs would have been great, but Oregon absolutely beats Baylor if Taylor Chavez helps spell the guards in that game. Sabrina ran out of gas playing the whole game, and couldn't make shots late...lacking guard depth cut the season short, not lacking bigs...

If Oregon has better depth this year, they should absolutely be #1. Oregon may have 3 of the top 10-15 players in the country with Hebard, Sabally and Ionescue. No one else can make that argument...
Stewart Mandel-"From a purely aesthetic standpoint, I much prefer to watch a good spread-rushing offense over a traditional Power-I offense, and Oregon's has been the most fun by far for the past several years. It's fast, its precise, and when Chip Kelly has the right quarterback (Dixon, Masoli) at the helm, the possibility of someone ripping off a 60-yard run exists on nearly every play."
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by StevensTechU »

bigsugarduck wrote:
StevensTechU wrote:Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
Wrong.

Depth was the downfall. Yes, of course a few more bigs would have been great, but Oregon absolutely beats Baylor if Taylor Chavez helps spell the guards in that game. Sabrina ran out of gas playing the whole game, and couldn't make shots late...lacking guard depth cut the season short, not lacking bigs...

If Oregon has better depth this year, they should absolutely be #1. Oregon may have 3 of the top 10-15 players in the country with Hebard, Sabally and Ionescue. No one else can make that argument...
Oh, I'm sorry. Thanks for setting me straight.

....
User avatar
bigsugarduck
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:52 pm

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by bigsugarduck »

StevensTechU wrote:
bigsugarduck wrote:
StevensTechU wrote:Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
Wrong.

Depth was the downfall. Yes, of course a few more bigs would have been great, but Oregon absolutely beats Baylor if Taylor Chavez helps spell the guards in that game. Sabrina ran out of gas playing the whole game, and couldn't make shots late...lacking guard depth cut the season short, not lacking bigs...

If Oregon has better depth this year, they should absolutely be #1. Oregon may have 3 of the top 10-15 players in the country with Hebard, Sabally and Ionescue. No one else can make that argument...
Oh, I'm sorry. Thanks for setting me straight.

....
:oops: Solid response to a jerk like me... :roll:

I totally get your point about the lack of bigs but really think that was simply part of the overall lack of depth.
Stewart Mandel-"From a purely aesthetic standpoint, I much prefer to watch a good spread-rushing offense over a traditional Power-I offense, and Oregon's has been the most fun by far for the past several years. It's fast, its precise, and when Chip Kelly has the right quarterback (Dixon, Masoli) at the helm, the possibility of someone ripping off a 60-yard run exists on nearly every play."
Merganzer
Senior
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:42 am

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by Merganzer »

User avatar
bigsugarduck
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:52 pm

Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25

Post by bigsugarduck »

Merganzer wrote:
Ooops....Guess I should have said 3 of the top 7 (draft eligible players) in the country...Apparently I undersold them...

Being cautious is understandable, but no other team should be #1 with the starter talent Oregon has.
Stewart Mandel-"From a purely aesthetic standpoint, I much prefer to watch a good spread-rushing offense over a traditional Power-I offense, and Oregon's has been the most fun by far for the past several years. It's fast, its precise, and when Chip Kelly has the right quarterback (Dixon, Masoli) at the helm, the possibility of someone ripping off a 60-yard run exists on nearly every play."
Post Reply