They could also say the same about us. We've beat teams with 1-5, 2-4, 3-4, 4-3, 4-3 records. The 3 teams we beat in the Pac-12 are respectfully last, second last, and third last in the Pac-12.dthomas=ddixon wrote:Yeah I just think it’s a lot of hype. They have 1 good win. They played great against Utah but also needed a FG as time expired to beat Georgia Southern at home. The UW win looked great at the time but beating them by 8 isn’t an impressive win at all now. UCLA is clearly a good team but nothing to be afraid of, especially at home.UOducksTK1 wrote:Not even factoring in the Georgia game, I still think is a toss up game. CK is deadly when he's on a roll. And he hasn't been on a roll in a long time, so for now I have to assume he'll be operating as the CK of old, which is insanely effective offensively. Our defense will have to have an A- game or better for me to think we will win. Anything less than that, then it makes me nervous this will be a 40+ point shootout where a couple turnovers or 4th down conversions will make or break the game. Making it more of a toss up then I'd hope for a top 10 Oregon team hosting anyone.dthomas=ddixon wrote:I’m curious why 1 game, the first of Lanning’s HC career and the staff’s as a whole, outweighs the 5 where we’ve shown to be exceptionally coached and prepared? Georgia knew exactly what we were running on D, no other team will have that advantage.
I get the respect for Chip but he’s been a mediocre head coach post-Oregon. He can still scheme up and call a game as good as anyone but they have to stop us first. Something no remaining defense has the ability to do without us beating ourselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And I still think we had no business winning the Washington State game.
Maybe we are more hype too?






