Week 9 CFB Discussion

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

User avatar
UofDuck
Senior
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm

Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by UofDuck »

webfoots2001 wrote:
DuckzRule wrote:
greenyellow wrote:Looks like Cam Rising has a supposed knee injury and isn't going to play tonight except in an emergency capacity.
If he truly stays injured during our game against the Utes I dunno if it will be a good thing.
How would Oregon have a better chance to win be a bad thing? Making the playoffs is nearly impossible with the way they played against Georgia. This season is about winning the conference championship game and hopefully am the Rose Bowl. The defense isn’t good enough to compete against Alabama, OSU, or Georgia.
If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
ducks5ever
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 936
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:15 pm

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by ducks5ever »

UofDuck wrote:If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
Hmmm OL isn't young. QB isn't young. LB's aren't young. DL isn't very young either. WR's are young but they aren't staying for 4 years. I'm talking starters only here. There's good depth behind the starters but I don't buy the "we are young" headlines.

As far as CFP goes. I think..... 1. SEC champ is in 2. 1 loss SEC team that is not the champ is in 3. Big 10 champ is in 4. ACC champ/Big 12 champ/Pac-12 champ fighting for last spot. Would've been nice to see Clemson lose last week but it didnt happen.

And for those saying... well this just shows that you get penalized for playing a tough non-con schedule. Well yes and no. Georgia will get in as a 1 loss SEC runner up without a question and that week 1 win will be a definite ++++ for their resume.
GrandpaDuck
Senior
Posts: 3312
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:48 pm

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by GrandpaDuck »

ducks5ever wrote:
UofDuck wrote:If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
Hmmm OL isn't young. QB isn't young. LB's aren't young. DL isn't very young either. WR's are young but they aren't staying for 4 years. I'm talking starters only here. There's good depth behind the starters but I don't buy the "we are young" headlines.

As far as CFP goes. I think..... 1. SEC champ is in 2. 1 loss SEC team that is not the champ is in 3. Big 10 champ is in 4. ACC champ/Big 12 champ/Pac-12 champ fighting for last spot. Would've been nice to see Clemson lose last week but it didnt happen.

And for those saying... well this just shows that you get penalized for playing a tough non-con schedule. Well yes and no. Georgia will get in as a 1 loss SEC runner up without a question and that week 1 win will be a definite ++++ for their resume.
I'm not opposed to a tough marquese game, the one last year established a clear path to the playoffs. But it was very unfortunate this year as a 1st time head coach, 1st time play-caller, new QB and running backs all could have benefited from a couple of warm-up games before that Georgia matchup. But games are scheduled years ahead and no one could have known how many new elements would be at play this year.
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4670
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by SuperDuck »

ducks5ever wrote:
UofDuck wrote:If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
Hmmm OL isn't young. QB isn't young. LB's aren't young. DL isn't very young either. WR's are young but they aren't staying for 4 years. I'm talking starters only here. There's good depth behind the starters but I don't buy the "we are young" headlines.

As far as CFP goes. I think..... 1. SEC champ is in 2. 1 loss SEC team that is not the champ is in 3. Big 10 champ is in 4. ACC champ/Big 12 champ/Pac-12 champ fighting for last spot. Would've been nice to see Clemson lose last week but it didnt happen.

And for those saying... well this just shows that you get penalized for playing a tough non-con schedule. Well yes and no. Georgia will get in as a 1 loss SEC runner up without a question and that week 1 win will be a definite ++++ for their resume.
I think the Pac-12 and Big-12 are extreme longshots. TCU might get in if Clemson loses. There's also the possibility of 2 SEC vs 2 Big-10 teams if the Ohio State vs Michigan game is really close.

We'll know a lot more once the CFP rankings come out.
Last edited by SuperDuck on Sat Oct 29, 2022 6:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
John 3:36
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4670
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by SuperDuck »

I'm putting Tennessee on potential upset alert today vs Kentucky. They're ranked #19 and have 2 losses, but at least one of those was without their starting QB. It's also a rivalry game. I still think UT wins, but I expect a close game.

Michigan has lost to Michigan State 11 times when MSU was unranked. They need to be on high alert today.

UCLA vs Stanford is also one to keep an eye on. I think UCLA is overrated a bit and may be coming off a hangover from the Oregon loss. On the other hand, Stanford is showing signs of life after 2 consecutive wins.

Thoughts?
John 3:36
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4517
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by nogerO »

SuperDuck wrote:I'm putting Tennessee on potential upset alert today vs Kentucky. They're ranked #19 and have 2 losses, but at least one of those was without their starting QB. It's also a rivalry game. I still think UT wins, but I expect a close game.

Michigan has lost to Michigan State 11 times when MSU was unranked. They need to be on high alert today.

UCLA vs Stanford is also one to keep an eye on. I think UCLA is overrated a bit and may be coming off a hangover from the Oregon loss. On the other hand, Stanford is showing signs of life after 2 consecutive wins.

Thoughts?
Agreed about Stanford game. I think UCLA got their confidence rattled a bit against us and DTR showed how immature he still is. Stanford could win this game.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
gogreen55
Senior
Posts: 2369
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:39 pm

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by gogreen55 »

From an optics perspective, it would be better for the Ducks if UCLA wins. Unless the Bruins are just incredibly mentally weak (I don't think they are, but who knows), there is really no excuse for them not to.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11017
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by buckmarkduck »

ducks5ever wrote:
UofDuck wrote:If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
Hmmm OL isn't young. QB isn't young. LB's aren't young. DL isn't very young either. WR's are young but they aren't staying for 4 years. I'm talking starters only here. There's good depth behind the starters but I don't buy the "we are young" headlines.

As far as CFP goes. I think..... 1. SEC champ is in 2. 1 loss SEC team that is not the champ is in 3. Big 10 champ is in 4. ACC champ/Big 12 champ/Pac-12 champ fighting for last spot. Would've been nice to see Clemson lose last week but it didnt happen.

And for those saying... well this just shows that you get penalized for playing a tough non-con schedule. Well yes and no. Georgia will get in as a 1 loss SEC runner up without a question and that week 1 win will be a definite ++++ for their resume.

Pretty sure our overall roster is the 4th youngest in the country.
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4670
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by SuperDuck »

buckmarkduck wrote:
ducks5ever wrote:
UofDuck wrote:If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
Hmmm OL isn't young. QB isn't young. LB's aren't young. DL isn't very young either. WR's are young but they aren't staying for 4 years. I'm talking starters only here. There's good depth behind the starters but I don't buy the "we are young" headlines.

As far as CFP goes. I think..... 1. SEC champ is in 2. 1 loss SEC team that is not the champ is in 3. Big 10 champ is in 4. ACC champ/Big 12 champ/Pac-12 champ fighting for last spot. Would've been nice to see Clemson lose last week but it didnt happen.

And for those saying... well this just shows that you get penalized for playing a tough non-con schedule. Well yes and no. Georgia will get in as a 1 loss SEC runner up without a question and that week 1 win will be a definite ++++ for their resume.

Pretty sure our overall roster is the 4th youngest in the country.
Actually, we are very young, but much of it is in our depth. For anyone else who has a subscription, there's a link to the Ducks roster below.

https://goducks.com/sports/football/roster?sort=class
John 3:36
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by Duck07 »

Classes by Scholarship Breakdown - Chile Duck still has the single best Roster page btw - https://web.nmsu.edu/~ogden/oregon/depthchart.html

FR/rFR: 29
SO: 30
JR: 12
SR: 13

By Starters (D-O)
FR/rFR: -
SO: 4-5
JR: 4-
SR: 3-6
Image
chapelhillduck
Senior
Posts: 2407
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:15 am

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by chapelhillduck »

Duck07 wrote:Classes by Scholarship Breakdown - Chile Duck still has the single best Roster page btw - https://web.nmsu.edu/~ogden/oregon/depthchart.html

FR/rFR: 29
SO: 30
JR: 12
SR: 13

By Starters (D-O)
FR/rFR: -
SO: 4-5
JR: 4-
SR: 3-6
Also, the entire staff were effectively true freshman coaches in that first game


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ducks5ever
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 936
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:15 pm

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by ducks5ever »

Duck07 wrote:Classes by Scholarship Breakdown - Chile Duck still has the single best Roster page btw - https://web.nmsu.edu/~ogden/oregon/depthchart.html

FR/rFR: 29
SO: 30
JR: 12
SR: 13

By Starters (D-O)
FR/rFR: -
SO: 4-5
JR: 4-
SR: 3-6
yeah i stand corrected. i didnt realize that there were this many underclassmen who were depth players
User avatar
DuckzRule
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 976
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 3:30 pm

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by DuckzRule »

Kansas State brutally murdered Oklahoma State...
User avatar
OregonFan4Life
All-American
Posts: 15385
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by OregonFan4Life »

DuckzRule wrote:Kansas State brutally murdered Oklahoma State...
That’s an understatement. What an embarrassing showing for Okie Light.
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39356
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion

Post by greenyellow »

Wake Forest got beaten badly by Louisville.
Image
Post Reply