If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.webfoots2001 wrote:How would Oregon have a better chance to win be a bad thing? Making the playoffs is nearly impossible with the way they played against Georgia. This season is about winning the conference championship game and hopefully am the Rose Bowl. The defense isn’t good enough to compete against Alabama, OSU, or Georgia.DuckzRule wrote:If he truly stays injured during our game against the Utes I dunno if it will be a good thing.greenyellow wrote:Looks like Cam Rising has a supposed knee injury and isn't going to play tonight except in an emergency capacity.
Week 9 CFB Discussion
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- UofDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 3969
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm
Week 9 CFB Discussion
-
ducks5ever
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:15 pm
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
Hmmm OL isn't young. QB isn't young. LB's aren't young. DL isn't very young either. WR's are young but they aren't staying for 4 years. I'm talking starters only here. There's good depth behind the starters but I don't buy the "we are young" headlines.UofDuck wrote:If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
As far as CFP goes. I think..... 1. SEC champ is in 2. 1 loss SEC team that is not the champ is in 3. Big 10 champ is in 4. ACC champ/Big 12 champ/Pac-12 champ fighting for last spot. Would've been nice to see Clemson lose last week but it didnt happen.
And for those saying... well this just shows that you get penalized for playing a tough non-con schedule. Well yes and no. Georgia will get in as a 1 loss SEC runner up without a question and that week 1 win will be a definite ++++ for their resume.
-
GrandpaDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 3312
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:48 pm
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
I'm not opposed to a tough marquese game, the one last year established a clear path to the playoffs. But it was very unfortunate this year as a 1st time head coach, 1st time play-caller, new QB and running backs all could have benefited from a couple of warm-up games before that Georgia matchup. But games are scheduled years ahead and no one could have known how many new elements would be at play this year.ducks5ever wrote:Hmmm OL isn't young. QB isn't young. LB's aren't young. DL isn't very young either. WR's are young but they aren't staying for 4 years. I'm talking starters only here. There's good depth behind the starters but I don't buy the "we are young" headlines.UofDuck wrote:If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
As far as CFP goes. I think..... 1. SEC champ is in 2. 1 loss SEC team that is not the champ is in 3. Big 10 champ is in 4. ACC champ/Big 12 champ/Pac-12 champ fighting for last spot. Would've been nice to see Clemson lose last week but it didnt happen.
And for those saying... well this just shows that you get penalized for playing a tough non-con schedule. Well yes and no. Georgia will get in as a 1 loss SEC runner up without a question and that week 1 win will be a definite ++++ for their resume.
-
SuperDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Contact:
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
I think the Pac-12 and Big-12 are extreme longshots. TCU might get in if Clemson loses. There's also the possibility of 2 SEC vs 2 Big-10 teams if the Ohio State vs Michigan game is really close.ducks5ever wrote:Hmmm OL isn't young. QB isn't young. LB's aren't young. DL isn't very young either. WR's are young but they aren't staying for 4 years. I'm talking starters only here. There's good depth behind the starters but I don't buy the "we are young" headlines.UofDuck wrote:If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
As far as CFP goes. I think..... 1. SEC champ is in 2. 1 loss SEC team that is not the champ is in 3. Big 10 champ is in 4. ACC champ/Big 12 champ/Pac-12 champ fighting for last spot. Would've been nice to see Clemson lose last week but it didnt happen.
And for those saying... well this just shows that you get penalized for playing a tough non-con schedule. Well yes and no. Georgia will get in as a 1 loss SEC runner up without a question and that week 1 win will be a definite ++++ for their resume.
We'll know a lot more once the CFP rankings come out.
Last edited by SuperDuck on Sat Oct 29, 2022 6:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
John 3:36
-
SuperDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Contact:
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
I'm putting Tennessee on potential upset alert today vs Kentucky. They're ranked #19 and have 2 losses, but at least one of those was without their starting QB. It's also a rivalry game. I still think UT wins, but I expect a close game.
Michigan has lost to Michigan State 11 times when MSU was unranked. They need to be on high alert today.
UCLA vs Stanford is also one to keep an eye on. I think UCLA is overrated a bit and may be coming off a hangover from the Oregon loss. On the other hand, Stanford is showing signs of life after 2 consecutive wins.
Thoughts?
Michigan has lost to Michigan State 11 times when MSU was unranked. They need to be on high alert today.
UCLA vs Stanford is also one to keep an eye on. I think UCLA is overrated a bit and may be coming off a hangover from the Oregon loss. On the other hand, Stanford is showing signs of life after 2 consecutive wins.
Thoughts?
John 3:36
- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
Agreed about Stanford game. I think UCLA got their confidence rattled a bit against us and DTR showed how immature he still is. Stanford could win this game.SuperDuck wrote:I'm putting Tennessee on potential upset alert today vs Kentucky. They're ranked #19 and have 2 losses, but at least one of those was without their starting QB. It's also a rivalry game. I still think UT wins, but I expect a close game.
Michigan has lost to Michigan State 11 times when MSU was unranked. They need to be on high alert today.
UCLA vs Stanford is also one to keep an eye on. I think UCLA is overrated a bit and may be coming off a hangover from the Oregon loss. On the other hand, Stanford is showing signs of life after 2 consecutive wins.
Thoughts?
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
-
gogreen55
- Senior
- Posts: 2369
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:39 pm
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
From an optics perspective, it would be better for the Ducks if UCLA wins. Unless the Bruins are just incredibly mentally weak (I don't think they are, but who knows), there is really no excuse for them not to.
-
buckmarkduck
- All-American
- Posts: 11017
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
ducks5ever wrote:Hmmm OL isn't young. QB isn't young. LB's aren't young. DL isn't very young either. WR's are young but they aren't staying for 4 years. I'm talking starters only here. There's good depth behind the starters but I don't buy the "we are young" headlines.UofDuck wrote:If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
As far as CFP goes. I think..... 1. SEC champ is in 2. 1 loss SEC team that is not the champ is in 3. Big 10 champ is in 4. ACC champ/Big 12 champ/Pac-12 champ fighting for last spot. Would've been nice to see Clemson lose last week but it didnt happen.
And for those saying... well this just shows that you get penalized for playing a tough non-con schedule. Well yes and no. Georgia will get in as a 1 loss SEC runner up without a question and that week 1 win will be a definite ++++ for their resume.
Pretty sure our overall roster is the 4th youngest in the country.
-
SuperDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Contact:
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
Actually, we are very young, but much of it is in our depth. For anyone else who has a subscription, there's a link to the Ducks roster below.buckmarkduck wrote:ducks5ever wrote:Hmmm OL isn't young. QB isn't young. LB's aren't young. DL isn't very young either. WR's are young but they aren't staying for 4 years. I'm talking starters only here. There's good depth behind the starters but I don't buy the "we are young" headlines.UofDuck wrote:If Oregon stays healthy and keeps improving weekly, I’d love a crack at any of them. I read where are are one of the youngest team in D1. We are seeing steady growth and improvements and good coaching brings that to a young team during a season.
As far as CFP goes. I think..... 1. SEC champ is in 2. 1 loss SEC team that is not the champ is in 3. Big 10 champ is in 4. ACC champ/Big 12 champ/Pac-12 champ fighting for last spot. Would've been nice to see Clemson lose last week but it didnt happen.
And for those saying... well this just shows that you get penalized for playing a tough non-con schedule. Well yes and no. Georgia will get in as a 1 loss SEC runner up without a question and that week 1 win will be a definite ++++ for their resume.
Pretty sure our overall roster is the 4th youngest in the country.
https://goducks.com/sports/football/roster?sort=class
John 3:36
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
Classes by Scholarship Breakdown - Chile Duck still has the single best Roster page btw - https://web.nmsu.edu/~ogden/oregon/depthchart.html
FR/rFR: 29
SO: 30
JR: 12
SR: 13
By Starters (D-O)
FR/rFR: -
SO: 4-5
JR: 4-
SR: 3-6
FR/rFR: 29
SO: 30
JR: 12
SR: 13
By Starters (D-O)
FR/rFR: -
SO: 4-5
JR: 4-
SR: 3-6

-
chapelhillduck
- Senior
- Posts: 2407
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:15 am
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
Also, the entire staff were effectively true freshman coaches in that first gameDuck07 wrote:Classes by Scholarship Breakdown - Chile Duck still has the single best Roster page btw - https://web.nmsu.edu/~ogden/oregon/depthchart.html
FR/rFR: 29
SO: 30
JR: 12
SR: 13
By Starters (D-O)
FR/rFR: -
SO: 4-5
JR: 4-
SR: 3-6
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
ducks5ever
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:15 pm
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
yeah i stand corrected. i didnt realize that there were this many underclassmen who were depth playersDuck07 wrote:Classes by Scholarship Breakdown - Chile Duck still has the single best Roster page btw - https://web.nmsu.edu/~ogden/oregon/depthchart.html
FR/rFR: 29
SO: 30
JR: 12
SR: 13
By Starters (D-O)
FR/rFR: -
SO: 4-5
JR: 4-
SR: 3-6
- DuckzRule
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 3:30 pm
- OregonFan4Life
- All-American
- Posts: 15385
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm
Re: Week 9 CFB Discussion
That’s an understatement. What an embarrassing showing for Okie Light.DuckzRule wrote:Kansas State brutally murdered Oklahoma State...

- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39356
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
