WBB P12T: Oregon v Stanford (Mar. 2, Thu 2:30 PM P12N)

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

WBB P12T: Oregon v Stanford (Mar. 2, Thu 2:30 PM P12N)

Post by greenyellow »

PAC-12 TOURNAMENT QUARTERFINALS
STANFORD
MAR. 2 (THU) 2:30 PM
LAS VEGAS, NV
TV: PAC-12 NETWORK
Image
GrandpaDuck
Senior
Posts: 3306
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:48 pm

Re: WBB P12T: Oregon v Stanford (Mar. 2, Thu 2:30 PM P12N)

Post by GrandpaDuck »

So last game at Stanford, Oregon employed a game plan to take advantage of Camaron Brink's history of occasionally getting into foul trouble. They went right at her. In the first quarter they took only 1 three point shot out of 16 attempts. On paper it was a valid strategy for a big underdog to employ. but it failed spectacularly. Oregon shot 12% for the quarter. Brink didn't get in foul trouble and actually ended up playing more minutes than usual while blocking 10 shots, scoring 16 points and getting 11 rebounds.

Pao Pao and Rogers only scored 11 points combined in the game.

It will be interesting to see what the game plan will be this time.
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4516
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: WBB P12T: Oregon v Stanford (Mar. 2, Thu 2:30 PM P12N)

Post by nogerO »

GrandpaDuck wrote:So last game at Stanford, Oregon employed a game plan to take advantage of Camaron Brink's history of occasionally getting into foul trouble. They went right at her. In the first quarter they took only 1 three point shot out of 16 attempts. On paper it was a valid strategy for a big underdog to employ. but it failed spectacularly. Oregon shot 12% for the quarter. Brink didn't get in foul trouble and actually ended up playing more minutes than usual while blocking 10 shots, scoring 16 points and getting 11 rebounds.

Pao Pao and Rogers only scored 11 points combined in the game.

It will be interesting to see what the game plan will be this time.
Score more points than Stanford some how! We need at least 3 of the ladies to have a good game shooting and Philly needs to get pissed off and actually throw her weight around. Who cares if she fouls out? It's ABOUT TIME our opponents knew the key is protected territory instead of a welcome mat.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
duck58
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:56 pm

Re: WBB P12T: Oregon v Stanford (Mar. 2, Thu 2:30 PM P12N)

Post by duck58 »

South Carolina is like us the year they cancelled. No one will beat them. Stanford is likely a final 4 team. If we could get some offense other than PaoPao and Rogers we could be a surprise team in NCAA.
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4516
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: WBB P12T: Oregon v Stanford (Mar. 2, Thu 2:30 PM P12N)

Post by nogerO »

The gang that couldn’t shoot straight will Be this teams’ legacy
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
gogreen55
Senior
Posts: 2369
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:39 pm

Re: WBB P12T: Oregon v Stanford (Mar. 2, Thu 2:30 PM P12N)

Post by gogreen55 »

Hanson was a huge disappointment this tournament. This is the time of the year you expect a highly experienced, hard-nosed senior to rise up and make a difference. Part of the reason this team has not lived up to expectations is the fact she hasn't lived up to expectations. As for Hurst, another highly experienced senior with no excuses, she has been one of the most incompetent players during conference play that I have ever seen. For her own well being, please refer her to a psychologist immediately.
shoparound
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 791
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 1:56 am

Re: WBB P12T: Oregon v Stanford (Mar. 2, Thu 2:30 PM P12N)

Post by shoparound »

Whatever happens from here on out, Graves desperately needs either new assistants or a new practice routine because these players just haven't shot well since our core group left.
Post Reply