This is what the east and west divisions look like now. I can't imagine any of the Pac-12 schools being placed in the east.
I wonder which teams will be moved east?
https://sports.yahoo.com/college-footba ... rence=BTEN
Big-10 Conference Realignment
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
-
SuperDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Contact:
Big-10 Conference Realignment
John 3:36
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40687
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Big-10 Conference Realignment
More than likely it’ll be two divisions. But the idea of 3 divisions was interesting to me too.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: Big-10 Conference Realignment
My understanding was that next season the B10 would not have division and have a Flex something model. Meaning that you played every team at least once every four years.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
-
buckmarkduck
- All-American
- Posts: 11017
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: Big-10 Conference Realignment
Also hearing there is a chance of no Div, we would play UW yearly, but play everyone else every other year. So SC one year then ucla, Michigan than MSU the next year type of thing.
-
SuperDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Contact:
Re: Big-10 Conference Realignment
Interesting. So they'd just take the top two teams and have them play for the championship?buckmarkduck wrote:Also hearing there is a chance of no Div, we would play UW yearly, but play everyone else every other year. So SC one year then ucla, Michigan than MSU the next year type of thing.
That seems odd because there are enough teams to have 9 per division. You could almost play round robin with that.
I can understand splitting up the LA schools each year as it will allow more teams to get exposure in that market.
It still seems odd.
John 3:36
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Big-10 Conference Realignment
i think divisions help the western four the most while doing nothing for the old members, which would be why its an optionSuperDuck wrote:Interesting. So they'd just take the top two teams and have them play for the championship?buckmarkduck wrote:Also hearing there is a chance of no Div, we would play UW yearly, but play everyone else every other year. So SC one year then ucla, Michigan than MSU the next year type of thing.
That seems odd because there are enough teams to have 9 per division. You could almost play round robin with that.
I can understand splitting up the LA schools each year as it will allow more teams to get exposure in that market.
It still seems odd.
