Big-10 Conference Realignment

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Big-10 Conference Realignment

Post by SuperDuck »

This is what the east and west divisions look like now. I can't imagine any of the Pac-12 schools being placed in the east.

I wonder which teams will be moved east?

https://sports.yahoo.com/college-footba ... rence=BTEN
John 3:36
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40687
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Big-10 Conference Realignment

Post by UOducksTK1 »

More than likely it’ll be two divisions. But the idea of 3 divisions was interesting to me too.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
Zyme
All Pac-12
Posts: 5582
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
GM: New York Knicks GM

Re: Big-10 Conference Realignment

Post by Zyme »

My understanding was that next season the B10 would not have division and have a Flex something model. Meaning that you played every team at least once every four years.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94

K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11017
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Big-10 Conference Realignment

Post by buckmarkduck »

Also hearing there is a chance of no Div, we would play UW yearly, but play everyone else every other year. So SC one year then ucla, Michigan than MSU the next year type of thing.
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: Big-10 Conference Realignment

Post by SuperDuck »

buckmarkduck wrote:Also hearing there is a chance of no Div, we would play UW yearly, but play everyone else every other year. So SC one year then ucla, Michigan than MSU the next year type of thing.
Interesting. So they'd just take the top two teams and have them play for the championship?

That seems odd because there are enough teams to have 9 per division. You could almost play round robin with that.

I can understand splitting up the LA schools each year as it will allow more teams to get exposure in that market.

It still seems odd.
John 3:36
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Big-10 Conference Realignment

Post by Duck07 »

SuperDuck wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Also hearing there is a chance of no Div, we would play UW yearly, but play everyone else every other year. So SC one year then ucla, Michigan than MSU the next year type of thing.
Interesting. So they'd just take the top two teams and have them play for the championship?

That seems odd because there are enough teams to have 9 per division. You could almost play round robin with that.

I can understand splitting up the LA schools each year as it will allow more teams to get exposure in that market.

It still seems odd.
i think divisions help the western four the most while doing nothing for the old members, which would be why its an option
Image
Post Reply