echo31 wrote:DING! DING! DING! WE HAVE A WINNER!
Why is it so hard for people to realize that the level of education at Cal is far superior the one you get at UO? We can't compete with Cal and Stanford if academics are important to a recruit.
You are correct sir, generally speaking. If his future major involves something that Cal is noted for, I'm all for his choice. However, I have to say that 99.99999999% of football recruits struggle when they get to any college. Cal, Oregon, Boise State - any college degree has value. Just because Cal is thought of as a better "school" than most others in the Pac 10 does not mean that the recruit is going to get a better job (non football) after graduation. In fact, If I was a recruit, I would be looking for an easier degree. A degree is a degree to most people.
Also, all this talk about Cal being a better school is very misleading. I went to Oregon to get a music education degree. Cal and Stanford have horrible music departments. ASU has the best music school in the Pac 10, and they are generally considered one of the weaker academic institutions overall. I think it is safe to say that not 1 recruit in this nation is smart enough to go to any school, no matter how "weak", and not learn a hell of a lot.
I think a lot of mommas need to realize that their little angel is not going to benefit greatly by picking one school over another for general education.